The principal held a meeting and said, The quality of teaching is almost no problem, and no acciden

I strongly disagree with this statement, schools are about teaching and educating people, and the quality of teaching determines the quality of students' learning, but should improve the quality of teachers and improve the quality of teaching, which is the foundation of a school.

It is unreasonable, but it is very realistic, and it is indeed necessary to put student safety in the first place, but it is not advisable to sacrifice the quality of teaching.

This is not right, the principal should be responsible for the students, and must not fail to pay attention to the quality of education, and resolutely not have accidents.

Nowadays, campus safety accidents occur frequently, which will have a greater negative impact on the school, so the principal should ensure the safety problem.

A principal said at a meeting that the quality of teaching almost doesn't matter, and no accident is the best result, and many netizens do not agree with such a view, not that teaching is not good? In fact, in the present, education is a very important key point, which is worthy of everyone's attention and attention, for the quality of teaching, we have to work hard to improve the quality of teaching, not to say that the choice to go to the quality of teaching, almost does not matter, so it is completely inconsistent with our current concept of education.

In the teaching process, the quality of teaching is a point that we must pay attention to, so the first half of the literal principal has been wrong, the second part, no teaching accidents, is the best, of course, we hope that the school and teachers in this regard, are able to protect everyone's rights and interests as much as possible, at the same time, but also to ensure the safety of students, no teaching accidents are of course the best, because things no one wants to happen, after such an accident happens, In fact, it is the students, parents and the school who grieve more, so the second half of the words can actually be understood by everyone.

So how can you become a good principal and pass on the school spirit and discipline to everyone accurately? In fact, the principal it plays a central role, he will be the education department issued by the task and teaching philosophy to the teacher, the teacher, and then pass to the students layer by layer squatting, if the principal at this level, there is a mistake, then the teaching philosophy and teaching method also has a deviation, so many times, the principal he plays a role in leading the whole school, but also hopes that he can be cautious in words and deeds, try to consider students and teachers, in the quality of teaching is to strive to improve.

What the principal said meant was that it was best if there was no accident, and he didn't pay attention to the students' grades, thinking that the students should just not fight, so he had such a statement.

Because in the process of education, there is no way to guarantee the quality of education afterward, there is no way to guarantee the learning ability of each child, and there is no way to guarantee their test scores, as long as they are not bad.

The principal hopes that the children will grow up healthily, and does not want the children to have all kinds of problems, and hopes that the school will be very stable.

That is, in the process of education, we must teach children how to live, we must let children have a good character, we must cultivate children's correct three views, and there is no big problem with others.

If the quality of teaching in a school declines, assuming that there is no difference in the number of students compared to before, then it must be the responsibility of the principal, after all, the principal is also responsible for the school's educational policy. But we can't blame the principal entirely, because sometimes there may be a problem with the education system of the whole school, which also needs our attention.

In the teaching indicators of many schools, the promotion rate of students is definitely an important indicator, and it is a key indicator, as long as the promotion rate of students declines, then it must be that the school is not teaching well. But if the rate of students goes down, who can be held responsible? The first to bear the brunt is, of course, the principal of the school, followed by the teachers of the school.

This also tells us that the teaching quality of a school is declining, and it is the responsibility of the principal not to be able to do all the things, and the principal is only the main responsibility. <>

This is the principal's primary responsibility, but not the full responsibility

The principal is the head of a school, and the main focus is also on the school's educational work, if the quality of teaching in a school declines, then the principal must be mainly responsible. Under the premise that the quality of students has not declined significantly, the principal usually grasps the education work, although the principal does not directly connect with the teaching tasks of the students, but the principal must implement the problems of which class and which classes in the school, if the overall quality of the school declines, this is not the responsibility of the principal. <>

It is also possible that there is a problem with the school's education system

In addition to the principal's incompetence, it may also be that there is a problem with the school's education system, the principal does not directly connect with the students' teaching, the principal only manages how the teachers teach the students. If the principal is strict with the indicators for teachers to teach students, but the teachers do not follow the requirements of the principal, and in the end, it will lead to a decline in the promotion rate of students, and other indicators will also decline, which means that the school's education system is broken, which cannot be blamed for the principal's ineffectiveness. <>

There is responsibility, because the principal did not plan the direction of education, so the principal has a certain responsibility.

I think the principal is partly responsible, because the principal did not make a plan for the overall development of the school, and failed to bring in excellent teachers.

I think the principal is responsible, but not all of them are the principal's responsibility, and the teaching of teachers is also problematic.