How to recognize the laws of thinking? What are the basic laws of thinking

The law of thinking is the law that the thinking follows to correctly reflect the objective reality. The laws of thought are not subjectively self-generated in isolation in the human brain. It is determined by the laws of the external world and is the reflection of the laws of the external world in the thinking process of people.

Although the law of thinking is based on the law of the external world, it is relatively independent and special, and has become the object of logical science research.

The so-called laws of thinking refer to the four basic laws of formal logic (the law of identity, the law of exclusion, the law of contradiction, and the law of sufficient reason) and the relationship between them.

Thinking is a kind of spiritual activity unique to human beings, which arises from social practice.

So, what are the laws of thinking? The answer must be sought philosophically, because this is the task and duty of philosophy, not the scope of psychological research.

Thinking is not only closely related to cognition, but also inseparable from thought (that is, the result of objective existence reflected in human consciousness through thinking activities), and its regularity can be abstracted as:

The activity of abstract thinking in the cycle of man's understanding of objective existence is reflected in the whole process from simple to complex, from low to high, from finite to infinite.

The law of thinking is the reflection of the law of the objective world in people's consciousness, and it is the reproduction of the essential connection and the inevitable trend of development in the process of the development of things. The basic law of materialist dialectics, that is, the thinking law of dialectical logic. The consistency between the laws of objective things and the laws of thinking is realized in understanding.

Reflecting the same law is the basic law of thinking. Reflecting the law of the same is to extend the relationship between thought and thought in the formula of the law of formal logic to the relationship between thought and existence.

Summary. Thinking methods and thinking laws are both concepts related to human thinking activities, but their difference is that thinking methods refer to the specific methods and strategies that people use when thinking and solving problems, and it is a specific way of acting.

For example, induction, deduction, analogy, analysis, etc., are all common thinking methods. The law of thinking refers to the principle of objectively existing, universally applicable, and inviolable regularity, which is a universal law. For example, the law of the unity of opposites, the law of mutual change of quality, and the law of negation of negation are all basic laws in materialist dialectics, and they are applicable to the development and change of natural and social phenomena.

Thinking methods and thinking laws are both concepts related to human thinking activities, but the difference between them is that thinking methods refer to the specific methods and strategies that people adopt when thinking and solving problems, and it is a specific way of action. For example, induction, deduction, analogy, analysis, etc., are all common thinking methods.

The law of thinking refers to the principle of objectively existing, universally applicable, and inviolable regularity, which is a universal law. For example, the law of the unity of opposites, the law of sensitivity in the rule of mutual change of quality, and the law of negation of negation are all basic laws in materialist dialectics, which are suitable for the development and change of natural and social phenomena.

Can you add, I don't quite understand it.

Well, it can be understood in this way: thinking methods are the way of action that people take according to specific situations on the basis of applying the laws of thinking; The laws of thinking are the principles of laws that exist objectively and cannot be violated, and they are the basis on which people use thinking methods. Hopefully, this will help you better understand the difference between thinking methods and thinking laws.

If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask!

Summary. Rules of thinking and laws of thinking are two different concepts, and they differ in the following three points. 1 Definition is different:

Rules of thinking refer to some guidelines and principles that people follow in the process of thinking and decision-making, which can be set artificially or formed by social and cultural traditions; The laws of thinking refer to the objectively existing and universally applicable laws, which exist objectively and are not subject to human intervention and change. 2. Different functions: the rules of thinking are mainly to guide people to think and make decisions, and to help people deal with problems more rationally; The law of thinking describes the regularity of objectively existing things and phenomena to help people better understand and understand the world.

3. Different variability: the rules of thinking can be adjusted and changed according to different situations and needs, while the rules of thinking exist objectively and are not subject to human intervention and change. Hope mine can help you!

Rules of thinking and laws of thinking are two different concepts, and they differ in the following three points. 1. Different definitions: rules of thinking refer to some guidelines and principles that people follow in the process of thinking and decision-making, which can be artificially set or formed by social and cultural traditions; The laws of thinking refer to the objectively existing and universally applicable laws, which exist objectively and are not subject to human intervention and change.

2. Different functions: the rules of thinking are mainly to guide people to think and make decisions, and to help people deal with problems more rationally; The law of thinking describes the regularity of objectively existing things and phenomena to help people better understand and understand the world. 3 variability is different:

The rules of thinking can be adjusted and changed according to different situations and needs, while the rules of thinking exist objectively and are not subject to human intervention and change. Hope mine can help you!

Can you add, I don't quite understand it.

In general, although there are some similarities between the rules of thinking and the laws of thinking, their definitions, roles, and variability are different. Understanding their differences helps us better understand the nature of human thinking and cognition, as well as the essential laws of the objective world. Li Rangsong.

1. The law is objective, not based on the will of people, we should act according to the law, emancipate the mind, be pragmatic and seek truth from facts. The construction of ecological civilization requires the coordinated development of resources, environment and population, and the correct handling of the relationship between man and nature, and the basic premise of dealing with the relationship between man and nature is to respect the objectivity of the natural world. Therefore, in order to vigorously promote the construction of ecological civilization, we should first respect the objective law and act according to the law.

2. The law is objective, it does not mean that people are powerless in the face of the law, people can understand the law, so as to use the law, so that the law for the benefit of mankind. The construction of ecological civilization requires us to work hard to deal with a series of relationships, adjust the industrial structure, vigorously develop a low-carbon economy, and give full play to the subjective initiative.

3. Combine respect for objective laws with subjective initiative. It is necessary not only to understand the relationship between ecological construction and nature and resources, but also to give full play to subjective initiative, make use of nature and resources, and achieve the unity of subjective, objective, and concrete history.