What is the substantial formalistic controversy between the logic of peasant action?

Hello, the substance theory and formal theory of the logic of peasant action are mainly the difference between action and theory. Specifically, I hope it can help you.

What is the direct difference between eating like a theory and a formal virus.

The controversy between the ontological theory of action and the theory of action is actually a materialized thing.

The logical entity of the peasantry's action is there, and efficiency has been produced in the cave of the gods, and theology is just a kind of imagination.

What is Farmer Action? Mine is the entity, and the shoe type is the moist pillow. It's just what it is, why can't you write it. Be sure to write the right actions. Top of the top.

The controversy between the substance theory and the formal theory of the logic of peasant behavior includes many aspects and contents.

The controversy over the substantive formalism of the logic of peasant action is very practical.

We are the entities of the logic of the peasants' actions, and what is this in the dispute over formalism? I don't understand either.

Understanding the phenomenon of migrant workers.

In high school geography knowledge, we will learn about the phenomenon of migrant workers, migrant workers are a special group in our country, they integrate into the city, and have made great contributions to the development of the city, but due to their own low quality, they face many substantive problems. Today, the teacher of Cool Lesson Network will explain to you his views on the phenomenon of migrant workers for your reference and learning.

As of 2003, the number of rural laborers who had gone out to work had reached 99 million, accounting for about 13 percent of the rural labor force, and there was a trend of continuous expansion. Why do so many peasants leave the land and go to the cities? I think the main reason is the uneven development of China's regions.

The peasants' economic development is too slow, and their lives are poor. Their income is no longer enough to feed their family. Moreover, going to the city to work is a more effective way, so now there are more and more migrant workers.

The huge contingent of migrant workers can supplement the insufficient labor force in the importing areas, and the wages of migrant workers are generally not too high, which is of great help to the economic development of the importing areas. In order to earn more money, migrant workers are willing to work more than the legal hours a day. In this way, migrant workers do not enjoy the rights granted by the Labour Law.

It is good for importing countries to have enough labor, but not necessarily in the long run. The quality of peasants is generally on the low side, and they do not know how to use new and high technologies, and this will never play a role in promoting economic development. When the business owner has enough labor, the farmers work hard to get up early and return late, and they go to the fields to cultivate whether it is rain or the scorching sun.

But vegetables are too cheap, not so much because vegetables are cheap, but directly because their labor is too cheap. When I went to the United States, I found that the things they made by hand were several times more expensive than those made by machines. But why is China the opposite?

Food for thought. So here are a few suggestions: 1

** Departments reduce taxes on farmers. 2.The market for crops has been appropriately raised.

3.Control the number of migrant workers. 4.

We should improve the quality of peasants and develop science and technology to rejuvenate agriculture. 5.Increase the welfare of farmers.

The above is the phenomenon of migrant workers explained by the teacher of Cool Class.com, different people will have different views on the problem of migrant workers, I hope you can fully mobilize your imagination and understand more relevant knowledge about migrant workers, these problems about migrant workers are the key content of the college entrance examination.

The overall level of scientific literacy of rural residents is low. In recent years, Wanzhou has increased its investment in cultural education and popular science publicity for the rural masses. However, due to the relatively short years of education and the low level of education of the peasants at the grassroots level, their cognition of modern high-tech knowledge has been restricted, and the peasants are generally not highly motivated to use science to get rich, and their scientific, technological, and cultural quality is generally low.

With the development of urbanization in recent years, educated, capable, and business-minded young peasants have gone out to do business, work, and settle down, and most of them in the rural areas are women, children, the elderly, and other left-behind personnel, that is, the grassroots cadres jokingly call the "386199 troops." Most of them only have a junior high school education or less, and some are even semi-literate.

2) The peasants' scientific awareness is weak. Scientific consciousness is the ideological concepts and behaviors of understanding, analyzing, and solving problems from a scientific perspective. Most of the peasants at the grassroots level do not have the habit of reading books and newspapers, are not good at using various media to improve their scientific quality, and do not know much about popular science knowledge in agricultural science, natural science, and humanities.

Taking agricultural production as an example, for a long time, farmers have mainly obtained farming technology through the words and deeds of their elders, and are accustomed to the traditional farming mode, and have a wait-and-see mentality or even rejection of emerging technologies - when the author participated in the three-in-three-same survey in a mountainous township in Wanzhou, I have encountered similar cases, and local farmers are generally skeptical about the new rice transplanting methods promoted by the scientific and technological personnel of the District Agricultural Committee, and refuse to accept them, believing that the rice transplanting technology they have passed down from generation to generation is correct. Moreover, a considerable number of peasants have given up the study of cultural knowledge and new technologies for the sake of immediate interests, and this short-sighted behavior has limited the peasants from obtaining more knowledge in a deeper and broader field and scope.

3) Scientific and technological training is not reasonable. The education of peasants' scientific quality is a long-term public welfare undertaking, and the local financial departments lack long-term planning for the investment of peasants' scientific quality education, resulting in the lack of special funding in many places, the lack of guarantee of training funds, the lack of strength of training institutions and district-level societies, and the enthusiasm for training is not high. At the same time, in the training, too much emphasis is placed on the training of breeding and planting, and there is a lack of innovation in the training of farmers' entrepreneurship and employment skills, and it is difficult for farmers with a low overall cultural level to learn practical skills that are quick and suitable for themselves.

In addition, in terms of training methods, most of the scientific and technological training for farmers in Wanzhou is mostly concentrated in the township conference room or village community activity center in the form of "big classes", and a small number of them carry out technical guidance in the field.