Is it appropriate to convict people because of wild animals?

Updated on society 2024-08-14
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-16

    It's not a question of how many kills.

    It's about what was killed.

    Of course, poultry and the like are fine, and they are raised for the purpose of eating, so there is no fault for killing them like this.

    However, in the case of wild animals, the fecundity may not be as strong as that of poultry, the number is scarce, and the loss caused by the disappearance of one species is not only the one who killed it, and all the people, once they disappear, it is difficult to recover. That's why there is such a law.

    Wild animals can't be more important than human life, but when they are killed, when they are eaten, does anyone think that? It's not all human fault. Without humans, they are also good.

    But once humans have harmed them, and they are on the verge of extinction, we have to protect them, and some people still kill them, do you think this is a crime?

    Hope is still on the verge of extinction to protect.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    Personally, I think it's a matter of nature. Since the law stipulates that it is illegal to hunt and kill wild animals, then it is a violation of the law, and it is a crime to be hoped for. It's like a thief stealing a few hundred dollars, you say that your white dollars are important or people are important, obviously people, but you still have to be convicted, because you broke the law.

    But I think that for example, if you kill a wild animal in order to save people, you can consider a lighter punishment.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    The resale of wild animals will constitute the crime of illegal acquisition, transportation, or ** of rare and endangered wild animals, and is generally sentenced to imprisonment of not more than five years or short-term detention, and a fine; If the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given.

    [Legal basis].Paragraph 1 of Article 341 of the Criminal Law.

    Anyone who illegally hunts or kills rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection, or illegally purchases, transports, or illegally purchases rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection and the products thereof, is sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention and a concurrent fine; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the circumstances are especially serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    The sentencing for the crime of carrying wild animals is up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention and a fine; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the circumstances are especially serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given.

    [Legal basis].

    Article 341 of the Criminal Law Whoever illegally hunts, kills, grinds, or sells rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection, or illegally purchases, transports, or transports rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection and the products thereof, is sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention and a concurrent fine; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the circumstances are especially serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given. Whoever violates hunting laws and regulations by hunting in prohibited areas, during prohibited hunting periods, or by using prohibited tools or methods, destroying wildlife resources, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or a fine. Where regulations on the protection and management of wildlife are violated by illegally hunting, purchasing, transporting, or naturally growing and breeding terrestrial wildlife in the wild other than those provided for in the first paragraph of ** for the purpose of consumption, and the circumstances are serious, punishment is to be given in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Legal Analysis: The illegal purchase of rare and endangered wild animals for food or other purposes is an illegal purchase under the Criminal Law. Those who illegally purchase wildlife are to be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention and a concurrent fine; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the circumstances are especially serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given.

    Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

    Article 341:Whoever illegally hunts or kills rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection, or illegally purchases, transports, or kills rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection and the products thereof, is sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention and a concurrent fine; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the circumstances are especially serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given. Whoever violates hunting laws and regulations by hunting in prohibited areas, during prohibited hunting periods, or by using prohibited tools, empty wheels, or methods to fight good letters, destroying wildlife resources, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or a fine. Where regulations on the protection and management of wildlife are violated by illegally hunting, purchasing, transporting, or naturally growing and breeding terrestrial wildlife in the wild environment other than those provided for in the first paragraph of ** for the purpose of consumption, where the circumstances are serious, a fine is to be imposed in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

Related questions
4 answers2024-08-14

In the wilderness, the dialogue between animals and people. >>>More

21 answers2024-08-14

Just like humans, animals need salt in their diets. The salt intake of animals is the normal functioning of the bodyNecessaryAnd wildlife. >>>More

10 answers2024-08-14

It can only be said that many can be saved, artificial breeding can give them a suitable living environment, and can protect them from natural enemies and humans, so that wild animals have a safe home.

12 answers2024-08-14

There are several main reasons why man-eating sharks are considered endangered wildlife globally: >>>More

29 answers2024-08-14

Maintain biodiversity and ecological balance, and promote the construction of ecological civilization. All organizations and individuals have an obligation to protect wildlife and their habitats. Illegal hunting of wild animals and destruction of their habitats is prohibited. >>>More