In fact, human nature is evil! Whose view is that human nature is inherently evil?

I tend to say that human nature is inherently evil, and the survival of the fittest is the law of survival. Goodness is learned in an environment under institutional control. When a person is born, he eats it before he opens his eyes!

Therefore, human beings, like other animals, survival is human instinct, and the law of survival of all animals is the law of survival of the weak. There are also people who think that human nature is inherently good, but it is also necessary to emphasize good education, what is education? Education is to teach people to understand the rules and abide by the system.

Overcoming greed and turning evil from good!

Only when a teenager experiences the pain of being hurt can he understand the preciousness of love. Or maybe they understand the importance of hurting others.

Life is a constant choice, good and evil will guide you to make these choices, because this is their mission, is the meaning of their existence, and when you get the answer at the end of life, you will find that it doesn't matter whether it is good or evil.

Human nature is inherently evil, and the so-called evil is necessary for survival, and so are you.

At the beginning of human beings, the nature is good, and the newborn child knows evil? It's all an acquired influence.

This is the view of Xunzi, a Confucian thinker in the middle and late Warring States period; On the issue of human nature, he put forward the "theory of sexual evil", which denied the moral concept of natural talent and emphasized the influence of acquired environment and education on people;

Xunzi put forward the view of "sexual evil", which is diametrically opposed to Mencius's theory of "sexual goodness". He believes that human nature is an innate and simple natural attribute, "mortal nature is also natural, cannot be learned, cannot be ,......."And in the human person, it is called "sex" (Xunzi Sexual Evil"), which is manifested as "armor and desire to be full, cold and warm, hard work and several grandchildren want to rest" (Xunzi Sexual Evil), so human nature is "born with good interests", "born with diseases and evil", "born with ears and eyes, with good voices and lust" (Xunzi Sexual Evil). The "goodness" of human nature is artificially acquired (i.e., "pseudo"), "human nature is evil, and its good is hypocritical" (Xunzi Nature Evil).

"Goodness" is the result of the acquired environment and educational learning, "those who are righteous and righteous are born of saints, people can learn and be able to do things, and those who have done things are also ......."It can be learned and can be done in talents, which is called hypocrisy" (Xunzi Sexual Evil). The "sexuality" given by nature and the "pseudo" of acquired learning are a pair of contradictions, and to solve the contradiction through "turning sex into fakeness", that is, to change the "sexual" chain through learning and things. "Sexuality" and "pseudo" are opposites and unified, "if there is no sex, there is nothing to add to the false, and if there is no hypocrisy, sex cannot be self-beautiful", only to achieve "sexual pseudo-union, and then the name of the saint is one" (Xunzi Rite Theory).

Xunzi's theory of "sexual evil" is very different from Mencius's theory of "sexual goodness", but they are the same in terms of the purpose of educating and reforming the people through the so-called "teaching of the holy king". His idea of sexual evil is also considered by later generations to be the germ of his Legalist ideological tendency.

"Human nature is inherently evil"It was Xunzi who said.

Xunzi developed Confucianism, and on the issue of human nature, he advocated the theory of sexual evil, advocated that human nature is evil, denied the moral concept of natural talent, and emphasized the influence of acquired environment and education on people. His doctrine is often compared to Mencius's 'Theory of Sexual Goodness', and Xunzi also made a significant contribution to the reorganization of Confucian classics.

Xunzi is best known for his theory of sexual evil, which is in direct opposition to Mencius's theory of sexual goodness. His general thesis is that everything that is good and valuable is the product of human effort. Value comes from culture, and culture is the creation of people.

It is in this regard that man has the same importance in the universe as the heavens and the earth.

"Human nature is inherently evil"It was Xunzi who said.

Sexual Evil Theory One of the important theories of ancient Chinese human nature, it is believed that human nature has the moral value of evil, and Xunzi advocated this theory at the end of the Warring States period. The theory of sexual evil, which emphasizes the necessity of moral education, emphasizes the necessity of moral education, and the theory of sexual goodness, which focuses on the goodness of human nature and pays attention to the consciousness of moral cultivation, are both opposite and complementary to each other, and have had a significant impact on the theory of human nature in later generations.

The first person in Chinese history to advocate the inherent evil of human nature was Xunzi. Xunzi's name, Ziqing, a native of Zhao during the Warring States Period, is more than 70 years younger than Mencius. When Mencius died, Xunzi was only over 10 years old and still a child.

Xunzi believes that people's natural desire for material life is in conflict with moral etiquette. He believes that human nature is "born with good interests", "born with diseases and evils", "born with ears and eyes, and lustful nature", and if "from human nature and conformity with people's feelings, it will be out of contention, and it will be violent due to chaos." Therefore, human nature is "evil", not "good".

Xunzi's concept of temperament here is related to the ideas of the early Confucian school of "sexual pretensions". However, the concept of sexual pretension and "love" as the sky has led to a naturalistic and emotionalist existential argument. Xunzi did not follow this direction, because he believed that the temperament of natural endowments was evil.

Therefore, conforming to his development will lead to competition between people, thieves and killings, and social chaos, which is the theory of sexual evil.

Xunzi proposed"Sexual evil"It is human nature that has evil, good and evil, and its student Legalist Han Fei proposed that human nature is inherently evil; Mencius proposed"Theory of Sexual Goodness"It is human nature that is good, and these can be seen in the Hundred Pulpit Yi Zhongtian's "Hundred Schools of Thought of the Pre-Qin Princes".

Neither good nor evil, but also good and evil.

Look at it from a dialectical point of view.

"One of the most revolutionary ideas we have drawn from clinical experience is the increasingly convinced that the innermost core of human nature, the deepest level of personality, the level of its 'animal nature', is inherently positive—fundamentally social, forward-moving, rational, and realistic. ”

Rogers' view of human nature is often understood as the "Theory of Sexual Goodness". This is not accurate. As Rogers said, the core of human nature is animal nature.

Because the existence of man as an animal or creature is a prerequisite for other attributes. There is no such thing as good or evil in animals. In other words, human beings are neither good nor evil by nature.

On the other hand, good and evil are a pair of uncertain standards – different eras, different countries, and different individuals have different views of good and evil. It's like measuring height with a ruler made of rubber bands. Therefore, the criterion of good and evil is also not applicable to defining human nature.

Rogers has a positive and affirmative view of human nature.

At the beginning of man, nature is good. I have heard this sentence since I was a child, although I also have friends around me who say that at the beginning of people, nature is evil. But I always feel that when I was young, I couldn't distinguish between good and evil, and I was kind to everyone, and it was only when I grew up that I saw the evil of human nature in the environment, on the Internet, and in various events, and then I became bad.

People are born to determine their own destiny, good and evil have existed in people's genes, and they will encounter corresponding conditions to catalyze the onset of this gene in the future, so people should follow their own thinking and actions to seek good and avoid evil, promote good and drive evil, this is the essence of human nature.

Human nature is not evil, it should be selfish. I see the source of evil as selfishness. In fact, selfishness and evil are only the "limits" of scope and degree. There is no absolute good and evil in the world!

It is true that human nature is evil, because no matter how human beings develop, they still cannot be separated from the attribute that human beings are animals, and if they are animals, they will show an evil side, and everything is for survival. It's just that social development has created rules, laws, and etiquette in order to restrain the evil side of human nature.

Good and evil are all relative, and there are different views from different standpoints. It's just that evil deeds are more remembered than good deeds, so people feel that there are more evil people than good ones.

Human nature should be good, in different environments, contact with different people, and receive different education

Yes, if you want to integrate into this society, you must learn to follow the rules of this society, and if your heart is completely exposed, you will deviate from this world.

At the beginning of man, nature is good. This is the first sentence in the Three Character Sutra.

However, when people come into this world, their first need is food. In order to survive, it is necessary to fight, which is already a behavior in the development of twins. This is especially true in living organisms, (sharks are said to kill their siblings inside their mother's body).

How do you determine "goodness"? Perhaps the criteria for this should be determined first. For the sake of not harming others, or is it limited harm?

When I was born, I didn't understand anything. Whether it is good or evil depends on the surrounding environment and the people who brought him up.

We ourselves are complex within multiplicity, with both good and bad sides. Doing bad things is not your essence problem, but the problem of the circumstances and circumstances you face that forces you to choose a good or bad direction. But there are two sides to the consequences

Good results and bad results, no matter what, you have to bear Human nature is abundant, don't be succumbed to the environment in which you live, enjoy life without too much ambition, work hard without having to add too much mission to yourself.

I wrote an article before, I hope it will be helpful to you.

Is human nature good or evil? Since ancient times, there have been different arguments, Confucianism has been inherited, and the theory of human nature has developed differently, Confucius said that sex is similar, Mencius said that human nature is good, which is the pursuit and yearning for the beauty of human nature, and Xunzi is still Confucianism but the theory of human nature has become evil. Is human nature good or evil?

In fact, Confucianism said that the society was changing at that time, and through the development of Confucianism, we can see that the society is changing, but is it fundamentally good or evil?

There are four theories of human nature:

1. Human nature is good Mencius.

2. Human nature is evil.

3. Human nature is neither good nor evil.

Fourth, human nature has good and evil Buddhism Tiantai sect.

1. If human nature is good, why do they still do evil? This saying is that people have a good heart, not that they are good by nature, but that they want to be good by nature. So human nature is not good.

2. If human nature is evil, why do they still do good? This statement is that human beings themselves have evil, and they are transformed and become good. Human nature is not evil, and if it is evil, how can he correct it?

3. Human nature is neither good nor evil, this statement is that human beings have no nature. Since there is no good or evil in the innate nature, how can there be good and evil in the day after tomorrow.

Fourth, human nature has good and evil, this statement is very scientific and very reasonable. Because human nature has good and evil, colleagues have. Let's see how it is cultivated.