Why is it that the more grumpy people in the workplace, the easier it is for leaders to be promoted?

Grumpy, in a way, is not a virtue, but in the workplace, you may often find that the more grumpy people are, the easier it is to get promoted, why is that?

If you look closely at these grumpy people, you will find that the source of emotions comes from the work itself, not simply emotional catharsis or the use of emotions to convey signals to blame others.

For example, many leaders like to lose their temper, and their subordinates will be angry once they do something wrong, on the one hand, there are personality reasons, but on the other hand, you should see that the reason why the boss is angry is because he cares about the results of his work, and you have made mistakes in his work, which has a negative impact on the results, so he will be angry and angry. But in fact, this kind of anger is just a manifestation of worrying about the results of the work, and there is no accusation or criticism in it.

For another example, some people are always in a hurry at work, and they are easy to get emotional when they disagree, and even quarrel because of some trivial things. In fact, if you look closely at the beginning of the quarrel, most of them are also related to the work itself. For example, the previous process is not in place, which affects the progress of the next process; Lack of communication during collaboration led to delays.

So,Grumpy is treated by one person in a wayWork attitudeSerious performance, only when you treat a thing more seriously, anxious and other seemingly bad performance, it reflects your importance to the work more from the side.

Of course, it should be noted that being short-tempered is not a good habit in itself, if you don't have such a habit, then don't let yourself deliberately develop such a habit, because in the work, the more harmonious the team atmosphere, the smoother the team's collaboration.

In short, not all grumpy people are able to get a good promotion at work, because the reasons behind grumpy are different. If you're just venting your negative emotions.

Or if you send a signal to blame others through your emotions, then the more irritable you are, the more you will be disgusted by others. On the contrary, if your original intention is to do your job better, then even if you are grumpy, the final result will be convincing to those around you.

Why is it that the more grumpy people in the workplace, the easier it is for leaders to be promoted?

People with a violent temper in the workplace are easy to be promoted, because the leader bullies the weak and is afraid of the hard, and likes to bully honest people. And this kind of dishonesty, they have to offer, and they dare not provoke. At the same time, these short-tempered people have their own opinions, are not easy to suffer, and are easy to win the initiative for the company.

1.People with a short temper are more reliable, confident and confident.

Generally, people with a big temper have their own abilities, so they have the confidence to speak. And he is not afraid of things, he does not twist and pinch things, he has his own methods, and he knows more. Everyone has their own temper, but if he is strong, then the leadership will naturally reuse him.

2.Grumpy people generally have opinions and ideas of their own, which are suitable for leadership and management.

Grumpy people are not easily controlled by others, they do not follow the arrangement very well at work, they will lose their temper according to their own needs, make demands, and it is reasonable. This type of person is suitable for management, more prestigious, and they dare to express their opinions and ideas. Some people are very powerful, but he obeys the company's arrangements in everything, is also very obedient, and has no temper, and it is difficult to get the company's reuse.

Because the leader thinks that you don't know anything, and he also thinks that you are a bully, he will no longer draw cakes for you.

3.People with a short temper are more reassuring to the leader.

Grumpy people rarely suffer when they do things, and they can solve things very well. And good-tempered people, they may not be very reliable, they may not be able to do good things for the leader, and they may be led by the nose. And the leader also likes people to have different opinions, so that he can make better decisions.

And those who are absolutely obedient to the leadership will find it difficult to put forward favorable and constructive suggestions. And the grumpy people, they can not only give better opinions, but also let their employees do things well together.

In summary, the more violent they are in the workplace, the easier it is to be promoted by the leader, that is because most of these short-tempered people have the strength, have their own opinions, dare to make decisions different from the boss, and they are more suitable for management and can bring a lot of benefits to the company. And those honest people are often absolutely obedient to the leader, and it is easy for the leader to feel that they are not assertive and easy to bully, so they will naturally not be promoted.

Grumpy people tend to be right about things and not people, are very attentive at work, and are able to do their due diligence. In general, they are more productive.

Because short-tempered people can manage others better, such people can better manage some subordinates.

Because a hot-tempered person has a strong deterrent power, he is a suitable manager and can manage his employees well.

If you have a personality and a temper, you will not be easy to be bullied, and you will be more assertive and energetic.

Maybe the leader has special selection criteria. It may also be because the more grumpy people are, they are very much in line with the personality of the leader.

The leader thinks that the hot-tempered person is straight and easy to manage!

Maybe temper tantrum is a responsible and caring attitude.,If you don't have a temper, Mumu must also be the kind of egoism.。

Shepherds need a vicious dog to manage the flock, but most sheepdogs will become wolves after a long time and start eating sheep on their own.

Venting your temper properly can avoid a clown smile on your face. In addition, many of the existing statues of the Yellow Emperor are wrong, the Yellow Emperor does not wear a crown, and the crown is to cover the emperor's clown smile.

Not to mention the constant trouble, the usual benefits are also him.

Temper tantrums are tortured. After a soft persimmon is trampled on in various ways, if it does not rot, then she will definitely become hard!

Leaders are also bullying the weak and fearing the hard!!

A short-tempered person, the louder the voice, the worse the cultivation, the Shura among the people, bullying the soft and fearing the hard!

Everything happens for a reason. People in the world value value, and they don't even value dignity anymore, because people only rely on value and interests to survive.

Shang Junshu made it clear, our ancestors told us thousands of years ago. Human nature is like this, and in the end, the enterprise is easy to collapse when managed by kind people.

Your cause and effect are reversed, and it is precisely because of the backrest that you are arrogant.

Leaders need people with red faces.

The current leaders sit on the mountain and watch the tiger fight; find problems in the struggle;

Compassion is not in charge of soldiers, and righteousness is not about money.

I've never seen a good-natured official, really, I haven't seen one so far.

A grumpy leader? It's him who fights!!

Actually, this statement is notNot really. Because leaders will only promote employees who have the ability to do the job.

Many people think that people who have a short temper in the workplace usually make the leader feel more scared. So leaders generally choose to promote this kind of employee, but from the perspective of real life, this kind of thinking is wrong. Because people who are more short-tempered will not be promoted by the leader.

This is not true.

First of all, people who are more short-tempered in the workplace will not have better interpersonal relationships. Because for anyone who works, they don't want to get along with people who are more grumpy. I also think that this kind of person can't control his emotions reasonably in the process of work.

This kind of thinking also exists for leaders, so people who are not short-tempered in the workplace are more likely to be promoted by leaders. <>

Leaders tend to hate employees who have lost their temper.

And from a practical point of view, most leaders will not accept employees who are more grumpy. Because this kind of employee will have conflicts with the leader in the process of work, and even have some language quarrels with the leader in the process of arranging the leader. Therefore, in the process of work, leaders generally hate employees who are more short-tempered.

Even the more important work will not be assigned to such employees. <>

Leaders prefer employees who have the ability to do the job.

Finally, in the process of work, if the leader encounters an employee who has the ability to work, he will usually maintain a good attitude towards such employees. And we will choose to promote such employees at the right time. Employees with good work ability will become the leader's right-hand man, and because of the existence of this kind of employee, the leader will have a better state to carry out his work.

Therefore, we will find that employees with better work ability will generally have a better working condition in the workplace. And it will also have a particularly smooth promotion treatment.

This is not true, the more tempered people are, the simpler their minds are, they do things without their own plans, and if they can't solve urgent problems in time, leaders will not promote such people.

I don't think so, I think it's easy to promote people who are friendly to employees and have outstanding personal abilities, but it also varies from person to person, and it can't be generalized.

I don't think so, usually such people are not stable enough to be appreciated by the leadership.

The general manager of our company is such a person, who is always amiable and approachable when he sees ordinary employees, and even makes a few jokes. As a mid-level manager, I was often scolded by the general manager, and it was hard to hear. Every year, our general manager is highly praised by the middle level and employees.

The staff found the general manager amiable and satisfied. The middle level felt that although the general manager beat and scolded us, the general manager paid several times the salary of the middle level than the employees. The middle level feels that it is worth being scolded by the general manager, so it is normal to be scolded in a few words, and it is also a satisfaction vote to the general manager.

What is this phenomenon? It's like a grandson, a son, and a grandfather. The son beats the grandson, the grandfather loves the grandson, and the grandfather beats the son.

Therefore, the bigger the leader, the more unscrupulous, and the smaller the leader, the more awesome. The second half of the sentence is fine, the first half of the sentence is your misunderstanding, because you are not qualified to be scolded by the big leader.

First, there is a difference in the level of responsibilities and rights of workplace management.

The power structure in the workplace is pyramid-shaped, with the first level being responsible for the first level, and generally not overstepping the command, nor reporting to the higher level, let alone the punishment of the higher level. The technical term is, step-by-step responsibility, management authority.

For example, the senior management of the company, the department manager who is in charge, and the department manager is responsible for the subordinate employees within the department. Executives train department managers, department managers train employees, and executives only grasp a few middle-level levels, and they can't be seen with ordinary employees. Because, according to the hierarchy, the senior management can only manage the middle level.

Second, the things that are right at the top and at the middle level are not the same.

The reason why the top management is high is that the position is high and the things are big, such as strategy, planning, arrangement, inspection and other things. The middle level is mainly to carry out tasks, directly face employees, pay close attention to the implementation of employees, face specific contradictions, and face dozens of employees, the forest is big and there are all birds, not bullish, can't be suppressed.

Third, the factor of cultivation and feelings.

The big leader is amiable to the front-line employees, firstly, because he can't turn his face with the employees, as long as he turns his face to the middle level. The second is that big leaders need to create a good image, and employees will eat this set, and everyone likes approachable leaders. Third, big leaders need the hearts of the people, amiable is the most advantageous, ordinary employees like cordial leaders.

Why do small leaders seem so powerful? First, the self-cultivation itself is not as high as that of the big leader, and the realm is not as high as the big leader. The second is that the small leader can't be too close to the staff, you are amiable, the staff is not afraid of you, how do you still grasp the implementation?

Third, the small leader deliberately pretends to be "blackfaced" and must be stern, otherwise, how can he establish his prestige? When a small leader becomes a big leader, his "temper" will also become amiable. Different heights, different realms, different needs.

In order to present a very good affinity for everyone, the big leader never loses his temper with the employees. However, if this is done often, it may make some employees particularly inattentive at work. Therefore, at this time, the small leader should become particularly fierce.

In this way, the personalities of the two people can become complementary.

Because there is actually no conflict of interest between big leaders and employees, and big leaders don't need to take care of employees, because there are small leaders, so small leaders are usually very fierce. There is a conflict of interest between employees and small leaders.

Because there are many small leaders who like to put on a leadership shelf, the small leaders are very fierce.

To be a leader, you must have a temper, and when you meet a female leader with a bad temper in the workplace, we all want to meet a leader who has the ability to measure and is amiable. With such leadership, you can not only work happily and feel happy, but also learn a lot. However, when the forest is large, there are a variety of birds.

You may meet a bureaucrat, a leader who likes to go up the ladder and has a fiery temper. What should I do when I encounter such a leader?

Regardless of whether the leader is fiery or moderate, all leaders can be broadly divided into two categories. One is really capable. In addition, he has a strong personality, pursues perfection in everything, and is almost nitpicky about his work.

In this case, if you make a mistake at work, the leader will lose his temper with you and will naturally understand you. After all, people are not right about things. In this process, you can even use the leader's criticism as a driving force to spur your own progress, so as to achieve a more perfect self; There is also a category of abilities in general.

At the same time, he is not broad-minded. In the face of the work of his subordinates, he often picks the bones in the eggs. In the face of such a leader, if you can't change the environment, then change yourself first and adapt yourself to him.

Of course, some friends may say that when they meet a leader with mediocre ability, bureaucracy, who likes to go to the next level, and has a hot temper, although they want to adapt to him, they are still very unhappy when they live with trepidation every day, what should they do? In this case, it is necessary to see the following instead. Let's take a look at how to deal with the characteristics of a bad temper.

The so-called control of the fire source is not to "provoke" him to lose his temper. You know, even a bad-tempered leader can't lose his temper with people all the time for no reason. What you have to do is to make as few mistakes or no mistakes as possible in your work, make all the preparations before the report, and don't give the leader a chance to lose his temper.

In this way, the bad temper of the leader will not have so many opportunities to attack. The so-called fire control means that when the leader is angry with you, he must not go against the grain, let alone add fuel to the fire. You need to learn to be soft-hearted and keep silent immediately to prevent the anger of the leader from spreading.

An appropriate attack means an appropriate "admonition". Some leaders have a habit of losing their temper and lashing out every time their subordinates don't do a good job. As a subordinate, he was even more nervous about such a leader.

So learn to give advice at the right time and tell the leader that it is not good for your health. Only when leaders truly recognize the mistake of tantrums can they make changes, so that they can better promote their work.