When talking to an interviewer, how do you express your strengths and weaknesses?

Don't really say your fatal flaw, even if you do, it is to say that there is a certain flaw in the matter, but you have found it and can improve it, in fact, it is to tell the interviewer from the side that I don't have too obvious shortcomings now.

For example, I can write that my previous shortcomings are that I am not good at communication, and then the work has been improved to be very good at communicating and collaborating with cross-department, which or I will not do reporting before, but now I have mastered the method of making returns, how to do it or I am not familiar with the business before, so I have done some strategies that do not land, and now I will first learn to learn and formulate strategies for a period of time to be more down-to-earth.

When it comes to your own shortcomings and shortcomings, you must start with your own qualifications, for example, because you have just entered the society, you may not be so strong in which aspects, you can improve the corresponding pattern, as a commissioner, you must not reach some of the abilities of some supervisors in some aspects, of course, do not point out this level, in this way, they will feel that you are reasonable, and you take the initiative to think about some problems. Then, once you are given the corresponding stage, you will definitely make up for the lesson.

Seek truth from facts, just point to the end, and at the same time grasp the skills, which makes people feel that they are talking about shortcomings, but on the other hand, they are also advantages, such as: sometimes they will be a little impatient when the work task is heavy, and they are not calm enough; Or they have a relatively straight personality, and they need more methods and skills to communicate with colleagues at work.

Here's another tip: start with the positive when talking about any negative issue, such as what you disliked most about your previous workplace. No matter how much you hate the previous company, praise it first, there is nothing particularly uncomfortable, if you have to say something to improve, then probably ......

These points must be real, innocuous little dots. In short, it is necessary to be sincere, combined with the job responsibilities of the interview, not in principle, there is no problem with mistakes and shortcomings!

First of all, it is necessary to be fair and just, and in the process of conversation, there must be no false situations, we must communicate with the other party calmly, and then you can also say more advantages, less disadvantages, but don't be too exaggerated.

How do you say your shortcomings? This is very skillful, because in the following conversation, we have to turn our shortcomings into our own strengths, for example, I am a slow person, but I am very serious, because there is an old saying that sharpening a knife is not wrong for a woodcutter.

Find out your three to five advantages in advance, preferably covering three aspects of study, work and life, and think of several related typical cases at the same time. It is best to pick one or two of these three to five strengths that best match the position you are applying for. On the other hand, when expressing shortcomings during the interview, it is necessary to choose those that do not hinder the interview based on the actual situation of the person, and strive to turn the shortcomings into advantages.

You should be straightforward about your strengths and weaknesses, and then explain with a few things how those strengths and weaknesses affect you.

Admit it and earn recognition. If it's your own shortcomings, the best thing to do is to admit them. It's no use arguing about your own shortcomings.

What matters is how you get others to emotionally agree with your attitude of talking about your shortcomings. Eliminating misunderstandings and narrowing gapsSome of the shortcomings are not shortcomings, but are the result of misunderstandings in general. You need to clarify in time and close the psychological gap with the interviewer.

Sometimes an interviewer will ask the candidate some pointed questions about what are your shortcomings or shortcomings in doing a certain job.

Or some fatal flaw in a certain job that makes people laugh and cry. Some of them surprise the interviewer. They don't hide their evasion, and they don't get straight to the point.

They combine the common weaknesses of newcomers to the workplace, such as lack of practical experience and shallow social experience. It also linked the development trend of their respective professions, such as unreasonable knowledge structure and insufficient professional knowledge to cope with new challenges. and the shortcomings in their own personality, such as excessive pursuit of perfection, lack of pioneering spirit, or excessive pursuit of work efficiency, lack of prudence, etc.

Talk about some of the weaknesses that you are overcoming and that you are able to correct, talk about the gap between the ideal and the reality. Talking about those personalities that are superficially shortcomings but are actually beneficial to a certain job not only embodies the virtue of humility and studiousness, but also positively solves difficult problems. Case Study: Gao Qian: A job seeker from a family went to an ordinary unit for an interview.

Born in Gao Qian, he may be mistaken for not being able to endure hardship. However, the candidate started from his father's strict requirements for himself, talked about his views on family background and attitude towards life, and let the interviewer know his excellent quality of hard-working and hard-working.

He shortened the distance with his employer and made the company feel that it was a material that could be manufactured. Psychological research has shown that interpersonal communication is authoritative, one is rational and impulsive. In interviews, we need to communicate more rationally, and rationality comes from adequate preparation and careful consideration, rather than childish impulses.

It's not terrible for a person to have shortcomings. The terrible thing is that he doesn't dare to admit it, he doesn't dare to correct it. On the contrary, he was reluctant to admit it.

From a dialectical point of view, disadvantages and advantages can be converted into each other.

When expressing your strengths, you must be low-key, but don't be too modest, be sure to show your strengths and shining points to the interviewer, be tactful when expressing your shortcomings, and never say some taboo words in the workplace.

You can talk to him directly, if your strength is particularly good, you can clearly express which aspect of you is particularly good at this time, you can give him examples, if you feel that you are weak, you can directly talk to him.

The best thing to do is to talk directly about your previous work experience and let him find your strengths and weaknesses on his own.

The interviewer asks you about your strengths and weaknesses, not your grades at work, nor your attitude towards your work. Analyze yourself, find out the characteristics of your own life and work, and express them in combination with your position. For example, in the face of managerial positions, some people can say that their greatest strength is their strong learning ability, being able to ask others for advice at any time at work, and constantly reflecting and summarizing their own work gains and losses.

This is an advantage that many interviewers are happy to hear.

In order to succeed in the interview, I personally think it is understandable that the interviewee should exaggerate his or her achievements or strengths. But it should not be exaggerated. When I interviewed a candidate, he said that his biggest advantage is his strong learning ability, how strong is it?

Reading three books a day and reading 21 books a week is intensive reading. I don't think it's very realistic, because he takes up all the time of the day just by working. Remember, after you've finished your strengths and weaknesses, the interviewer is likely to ask questions.

It is very important to have your own logic and be able to justify yourself.

It is neither concealed nor straightforward, but talks about the common weaknesses of newcomers (such as lack of practical experience, lack of experience), and the development trend of the position and the industry situation (such as lack of professional knowledge, need to strengthen learning, etc.) and the shortcomings in their own personality (such as excessive pursuit of perfection, or too much pursuit of work efficiency, too much caution, etc.). Some shortcomings are actually not shortcomings, and when expressing some personal weaknesses, it shows that they are overcoming and improving.

The most important thing in the interview is to test our on-the-spot adaptability, no matter what question the interviewer asks, we should think about it for three seconds before they ask the question, if you don't understand what answer they want to hear, you can say it again, sorry I didn't hear your question very clearly, can you say your question again? In this way, buy time and think about what the interviewer wants to hear, and you must avoid grabbing the topic immediately, but don't be afraid either.

When talking to the interviewer, don't directly say that you are not good at these things, but you can learn and correct them so that the interviewer will not leave a bad impression. When expressing his strengths, he can say what he is good at.

Truthfully express your strengths and weaknesses, don't let the group lose too much to exaggerate your advantages, don't blacken yourself, be sure to show your serious attitude, and talk about your own ability, so that the interviewer can fundamentally see your value.

You can take the initiative to express your strengths and weaknesses, and you should show your most cheerful side to the other party, so that the other party will have a clear understanding of their own limbs, and it will also leave a good impression on the other party.

As for the advantages and disadvantages of employees, a large part of them is actually a question of whether they match the corporate culture and values, and the gap is too large, and some companies would rather give up than easily shake their own culture and other fundamentals. The evaluation of oneself is too superficial, for example, some people say that the advantage is that they are very familiar with the office software, but when they really get started, they find that they can't even do the red-headed documents well - this kind of self-understanding is not objective, and the HR of many enterprises will characterize it as an attitude problem. The purpose of the interview is to select an excellent employee for the company, but it is difficult to really see whether a person is excellent in such a short period of time, and it can only be tested by asking questions and other methods.

When asked about a person's strengths and weaknesses, this is a good test, smart people will be skillful, and the average person is also truthful, and some are exaggerated, only saying the good and not the bad. It is directly possible to judge whether the interviewer has a proper grasp of the expression and proportion, which is an important embodiment of communication skills; The second aspect can listen to whether the candidate's self-perception is reasonable, whether it is inferiority or conceit; Third, it can be cross-checked with the overall performance in the interview to see if it is logically reasonable; Fourth, it can be corroborated with the interviewer's own judgment; In the end, it may be a casual question, but the aim is to exclude other exceptions.

There are those who have low self-esteem. This kind of candidate is not modest, he is really lacking in self-confidence and feels that he still has a lot of room for improvement. Such candidates generally do not receive the highest salary, and are not ambitious or enterprising, which may limit their personal development.

For example, when a major task or opportunity arises, others are fighting for it, and he hides back, even if he is strong, it is difficult to be promoted. A good recruiter must decide what kind of people to use according to the specific situation of the recruitment position and the development of the company. For example, if you are a start-up company, you should pay more attention to its merits.

For enterprises in stable periods, they should pay more attention to the shortcomings of each other, because enterprises can mainly prevent risks.

When faced with your own shortcomings, the best way to express yourself is to be subtle, and you should also maintain a humble attitude and not be too conceited.

It can be said that you can learn these professional things in a short period of time, and your own learning ability is also very strong, so you can solve them independently.

Here's how to express your strengths and weaknesses in an interview:

1. Preparations:

Find out 3-5 strengths of yourself before the interview; Find a few examples of each strength, preferably from study, work, and life; Among these 3 to 5 advantages, select one or two that are most consistent with the position you are applying for. Second, the method of expression:

When expressing shortcomings, you should not only combine your actual situation, but also choose those that do not hinder the interview, and strive to turn the shortcomings into advantages. When talking about personal shortcomings during the interview, you can follow the following principles: admit it calmly, and the blog manuscript will be agreed; Eliminate misunderstandings and narrow barriers; Talk about the shortcomings and discuss the advantages; Don't brag during the interview process, bragging is not about showing strengths, but about attaching disadvantages; We must have enough confidence and a strong desire to express ourselves, and do not ask a single question, answer a word, or even ask a few words and cannot answer a word, at this time silence, frustration, cringe, reserve, shyness, embarrassment, and other psychological states and external manifestations may lose employment opportunities.