-
It is felt that the punishment is light, and the punishment for such acts should be increased and coercive measures should be taken. In fact, this situation is somewhat common, and the current law enforcement is weak, so you should be told that you have done the wrong thing for the first time, warned you to return to your seat immediately for the second time, and taken coercive measures for the third time!
-
A fine of 200 plus a 180-day ban on the train is already reasonable at the moment! In this kind of laipi world, hegemony is a very small thing, the law can't do anything to them, and the cost of breaking the law is low, so they dare to cheat. I think that the state will definitely legislate for this kind of fraud in the shortest possible time, similar to the non-payment of debts, which will not be returned after the court has decided, and will have a certain deterrent effect on the recovery and auction of personal property.
-
Reasonable, but note that malicious netizens should be prohibited from over-punishing, and these netizens who are used to over-punishing are much worse than the women who occupy the seats. To put it bluntly, this is a matter that should be handled in the right way, and everything should be over. And for such a trivial matter, the public security punishment will do.
Today you can deprive this because of this moral issue, and tomorrow you can deprive that because you don't like it, what qualifications do these Internet viewers have to be above the law.
-
I think it's good to have a punishment, and if you announce it on the Internet, everyone will pay attention to it, so if there is a punishment. It will let more people know what civility and politeness are! But there are still many things in this society that have not been taken seriously.
-
In fact, it is a lack of experience in dealing with this lack of morality, there was no such thing before, or it rarely happened, ** underdeveloped, even if there is a spread range, it is not large, now it is different, the speed of the fryer is too fast. In addition, there is also a lack of legal basis and social atmosphere for heavier punishments, if there are really people manipulating, then it is good to have a little more such things, let the law, let the society pay more attention to it, and enter the regular as soon as possible.
-
Although it is not much to punish her with 200, the network is so developed, the moral punishment must be more than 200
-
Only the fine is insufficient, and there may be such an incident next time, but it is just a fine. People who can behave like hegemony care about moral vision at all, let alone a mere 200 fine. This kind of actor should take another ideological and moral lesson.
-
fined her 200 yuan according to the current law, and she had nothing to say; According to the moral bottom line, how will the people punish her? Is the public outrage of Chinese society to use a fine of 200 yuan to get in place, don't ferment? I think this way of dealing with it is a "tofu scum style stability maintenance failure", which will provoke a new wave of incomprehension and depression.
-
Fines are not an option, a relevant document must be issued to rectify these people who disturb the public order, what if there are such people every day? Such a law must be issued in order to restrain their behavior!
-
There is no need to care. It doesn't matter how much the fine is. The main thing is that we know a person who has no morals.
-
I think it's too light, this kind of 200 yuan is not enough to play a substantive role, or to formulate corresponding solutions, only when the system is clear, there will not be so many people who know that they are losing money and take advantage of it.
-
Legal analysis: After investigation and evidence collection in accordance with the law, it is determined that his behavior constitutes a violation of public security administration by "disrupting the order on public transportation", and he is fined 200 yuan in accordance with the provisions of Article 23, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 3 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Public Security Administration Punishments.
Legal basis: "Law of the People's Republic of China on Public Security Administration Punishments" Article 2 Demolition 13 Anyone who commits any of the following acts shall be given a warning or a fine of not more than 200 yuan; The plot is heavier. They are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 500 RMB
1) Disrupting the order of organs, groups, enterprises, or public institutions, causing work, production, business, medical treatment, teaching, or scientific research to be unable to proceed normally, and not causing serious losses;
2) Disrupting the order of stations, ports, docks, airports, shopping malls, parks, exhibition halls, or other public places;
3) Disrupting order on buses, trams, trains, ships, aircraft, or other means of public transportation;
4) Illegally intercepting, forcibly boarding, or pickpocketing motor vehicles, ships, aircraft, or other means of transport, impacting the normal operation of the means of transport;
5) Disrupting the order of elections conducted in accordance with law.
Where a crowd is assembled to carry out the conduct described in the preceding paragraph, the ringleaders are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 1,000 RMB.
-
Legal analysis: The result of the report of the high-speed rail overlord woman was that her behavior constituted a violation of public security administration that disrupted the order on public transportation, and she was fined 200 yuan for administrative punishment.
Legal basis: Article 23 of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law" has any of the following acts, a warning or a fine of less than 200 yuan shall be imposed; where the circumstances are more serious, they are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 500 RMB
1.Disrupting the order of organs, groups, enterprises, or public institutions, causing work, production, business, medical treatment, teaching, or scientific research to be unable to proceed normally, and not causing serious losses;
2.disrupting the order of Zaohe stations, ports, docks, airports, shopping malls, parks, exhibition halls or other public places;
3.Disturbing the order of public vehicles, trams, trains, ships, aircraft, or other means of public transportation.
-
Legal analysis: High-speed rail hegemony is an act that disrupts the order on buses, trams, trains, ships, aircraft or other public transportation, which violates the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, and is generally punished with a warning or a fine of less than 200 yuan according to the regulations; where the circumstances are more serious, they are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 500 RMB.
Legal basis: Article 23 of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China" Anyone who commits any of the following acts shall be given a warning or a fine of up to 200 yuan; where the circumstances are more serious, they are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 100 RMB: (1) Disrupting the order of organs, groups, enterprises, or public institutions, causing work, production, business, medical treatment, teaching, or scientific research to be unable to proceed normally, and serious losses have not yet been caused; (2) Disrupting the order of stations, ports, docks, bureaus, shopping malls, parks, exhibition halls, or other public places; 3) Disrupting order on buses, trams, trains, ships, aircraft, or other means of public transportation; 4) Illegally intercepting, forcibly boarding, or pickpocketing motor vehicles, ships, aircraft, or other means of transport, impacting the normal operation of the means of transport; 5) Disrupting the order of elections conducted in accordance with law.
Where a crowd is assembled to carry out the conduct described in the preceding paragraph, the ringleaders are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 1,000 RMB.
-
When the conductor is reluctant to get up after many times of communication, his behavior constitutes a violation of public security management of "disrupting the order on public transportation", and he is punished with an administrative penalty of a fine of 200 yuan and a ban on purchasing train tickets for 180 days.
In accordance with the Law on Public Security Administration Penalties
Article 23: Those who commit any of the following acts shall be given a warning or a fine of up to 200 yuan; where the circumstances are more serious, they are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 500 RMB
1) Disrupting the order of organs, groups, enterprises, or public institutions, causing work, production, business, medical treatment, teaching, or scientific research to be unable to proceed normally, and not causing serious losses;
2) Disrupting the order of stations, ports, docks, airports, shopping malls, parks, exhibition halls, or other public places;
3) Disrupting order on buses, trams, trains, ships, aircraft, or other means of public transportation;
4) Illegally intercepting or forcibly boarding or pickpocketing motor vehicles, ships, aircraft, or other means of transport, affecting the normal operation of the means of transport;
5) Disrupting the order of elections conducted in accordance with law.
Where a crowd is assembled to carry out the noisy and rude conduct in the preceding paragraph, the ringleaders are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 1,000 RMB.
The "Guangdong Provincial Railway Safety Management Regulations" has been passed through the legislative process, and the regulations clearly stipulate that passengers shall take the train according to the seats shown on the tickets and shall not forcibly occupy the seats of others.
It stipulates that if there is a prohibited act including occupying a seat, the public security organ will order it to make corrections, and impose a fine of not less than 10,000 yuan but not more than 50,000 yuan on the unit, and a fine of not less than 500 yuan but not more than 2,000 yuan on the individual.
The Regulations make it clear that railway transport enterprises shall, in accordance with provisions, establish and complete a railway passenger credit information management system, record untrustworthy conduct that disrupts the order of railway station and train transportation, endangers railway safety, causes serious negative social impact, and seriously violates the safety management rules and regulations of railway transport enterprises, and sends it to the national and local credit information sharing platforms in accordance with provisions. Relevant departments and railway transport enterprises shall carry out joint disciplinary action against untrustworthy conduct in accordance with law.
-
We know that when watching the news in recent years, it is really common for high-speed rail to occupy seats like this. Many times, we will feel very angry when we see such a **, because many times people like this kind of hegemon people can't make sense no matter how they attack him with words, like this high-speed rail hegemon woman was fined 200 yuan, which is really happy.
First, we must severely punish those who dominate. If you want to avoid this kind of high-speed rail thing from happening, you must severely punish those who dominate the throne. We can't just let go of these hegemonic people, otherwise if everyone follows suit after seeing it, then it's really a mess.
Fines like this are very good, and I think the fines should be more severe, you can fine 500 or even 1,000 yuan, so that there is a warning effect.
Second, many times the hegemonic people are very unreasonable. In the past, many times when encountering such a phenomenon of hegemony, the conductor was helpless. Many times you can only let the person who is occupied go to another seat to sit, and the person who faces this kind of hegemony is really at a loss, because it doesn't make sense no matter how you say it, how you persuade it, you can't persuade the good words, and the bad things are all said, such people are invulnerable, so whenever you see such a **, it will make people feel very angry.
After this kind of punishment comes out, I believe that these hegemonic people will also converge a lot.
Third, we must increase the punishment measures. Some punishment measures can also be added, for example, a person who has this hegemonic phenomenon can be put on the list of dishonest in the future, so that he cannot take transportation such as high-speed rail and airplanes for half a year. Otherwise, if he dominates the seat every time, it will be very influential for everyone on the plane or high-speed rail.
If you want to prevent such a thing from happening, you must increase the punishment.
To sum up, we can find that if we want to put an end to such a thing as high-speed rail hegemony, we must severely punish those who dominate. What else do you think about this? You can talk about it in the comment area, and let's discuss it together.
-
At this time, we can formulate some more severe punishment measures to curb the occurrence of this kind of behavior, and at the same time, in ordinary life, we need to carry out some propaganda to let people understand the harm of hegemony.
-
The punishment can be increased, and only when it comes to the issue of interests, will individual behavior be regulated and hegemony incidents avoided.
-
This kind of hegemonic incident should be severely punished, and once it is discovered, it should be dealt with seriously, and education should be strengthened, so that the occurrence of this phenomenon can be reduced.
-
I think there should be a corresponding regulation and this kind of behavior should be included in the punishment, so that this kind of thing can be effectively prevented.
-
We often encounter some people occupying other people's seats on high-speed trains or airplanes, and most of the means of transportation such as high-speed trains and airplanes are one seat per person. So just sit in your own seat, if it's mandatory to occupy someone else's seatThen it must be punished by law, and things like this have happened a lot.
On the train from Anhui to Shanghai, there was a woman who occupied someone else's seat, and the attendant also reminded her in a good voice, but the woman didn't listen to others. In desperation, the high-speed rail attendant had no choice but to call the police. ** also punished this woman and fined 200 yuan, and many netizens said that the punishment was a little light.
Because if you occupy other people's seats on the high-speed rail, it really affects other people's riding experience. And some people said that they would be very angry if they encountered such a thing, because each of us used money to buy tickets, why should others sit when they want to sit on the seats they bought? And now our country has a clear legal law on such things as occupying seats.
If you have a seat, you can sit in your own seat, and there is no need to be someone else's seat.
When we encounter such a thing, we must go to the crew of the high-speed rail, and if we solve it ourselves, it is very likely that we will quarrel with others. In order to cause unnecessary quarrels, such a thing was encountered. We can first choose to seek the help of the high-speed rail crew, and if the problem is not solved, then directly call the police.
This practice is worthy of our rejection at any time, and such a thing as high-speed rail occupying seats is completely unqualified behavior. At the same time, I also hope that these people can improve their own quality, do not make unnecessary resistance, and everyone has a seat for everyone.
The second-class seats of the high-speed rail are A and F by the window, C and D by the aisle, and B in the middle of the three seats. Under the second-class seat of the high-speed rail, there are two sockets in each row to facilitate the charging of mobile phones. The second-class seats can be reclined by about 45 degrees, and there is a small dining table behind each seat. >>>More