The school is going to hold a style competition, and there is a project that is a knowledge quiz for

Cruel words are secondary, give the other party a look, and make the other party speechless.

It's economics in the narrow sense. Or is it generalized?

In a broad sense, it includes economics, finance, currency, statistics, accounting, and economic law.

Integrity Debate Contest Reference Debate Topics.

No. Counter-party knowledge is more important than integrity.

1 Integrity is primarily determined by personal factors.

2 Doing business well doesn't have to be honest.

3. Being honest will not suffer.

4. In the market economy, interests are more important than integrity.

5 Knowledge over integrity.

6 In today's society, honesty suffers.

7. Knowledge of talent training in colleges and universities comes first.

8 In this day and age, love should be advocated to do what we do.

9 Honesty can do more harm than good.

10 Student loans, system first.

11. Honesty is not the foundation of business.

12 It is foolish to respond to lying among classmates.

13 Honesty is not a condition.

14 When society is honest, so is the individual.

15 Integrity is a social issue.

16 Interest default is included in the credit reporting system, and the penalty is excessive.

17 Integrity depends primarily on self-discipline.

18 White lies are worth advocating).

19 Student loan defaults are unforgivable.

20 Life doesn't need beautiful lies.

21 College students do not necessarily establish integrity files (it is recommended to change the statement)22 Integrity can be discounted.

Questions can be divided into large groups and numbered separately. Contestants randomly select a group of questions to answer, and the final judgment is based on the number of questions they answer correctly. In addition, it is recommended to keep the rush to answer this link, if you feel too old-fashioned, you can let the audience ask questions, and the contestants will rush to answer.

Hope it helps.

According to our years of experience in holding knowledge contests, we have seen some innovative practices for some customers in planning competitions, such as changing the rush to answer by the grabber can answer by himself, if he is not sure to answer, the grabber can designate another team to answer the question, if the other team answers correctly, the other team will add points, and deduct points by themselves; If the other team answers incorrectly, the other team will deduct points and add points for themselves. It is also possible for the grabber to ask the computer to randomly draw another team to answer the question.

This is not the Olympiad ==You see.

Wisdom is back, and the brave are invincible! What do you think?

Let's make a multi-functional desk lamp, and I want the kind that can not have a big impact on eyesight, and it is smart. I think this is a good production for students. Protect your eyesight.

Make a small electronic device that reminds students to remember to bring a key when they go out.

First line: Title.

Then write your plan (e.g. who participates, where to participate, competition classification).

Finally, there is the planner, the time.

We're also going to have a Rubik's Cube competition, how was your event?