Was Freud an idealist or a materialist?

Freud was not seen as either an idealist or materialist philosopher. His psychological perspectives revolutionized the idea of the human mind, proposing many new concepts and terms, such as id, ego, superego, mother-love emotion, and death impulse.

Although the role of unconscious thought processes before Freud is greatly underestimated, he did advance the development of modern psychology and is considered the most influential and important figure in the development of modern psychology.

Thus, Freud can be considered a great psychologist but does not belong to the school of idealistic or materialist philosophy.

Judging from his research process, he is an objective materialist, who did not imagine out of thin air, but carefully studied the human psyche.

Freud's psychological research is the study of the spiritual realm, not the material realm of man! Do you say he is idealistic or materialistic?

Nietzsche was an idealist.

Nietzsche was the first person to clearly reveal the unconscious realm of the human psyche and dissect it in detail, and his works have provided many enlightening ideas for the study of modern deep psychology.

Freud laid the foundation for psychoanalysis with his book The Interpretation of Dreams, and Nietzsche made a similar analysis of the role and mechanism of dreams twenty to thirty years before him. Nietzsche has many brilliant insights into the unconscious, but these insights are still sporadic.

Nietzsche also further analyzes the deep mental activity behind consciousness. He believed that consciousness was nothing more than a state of our mental and psychological world, and Nietzsche's emphasis on the exploration of the deep psychology behind consciousness made him a pioneer of Freud's psychoanalytic school recognized in academic circles.

There are currently two types of claims.

One group thinks that he is not interested in ontology, and in the language of political textbooks, he is not interested in the question of "what is primacy", and his main contribution is in the study of ethics and values.

The other group thinks that he belongs to the "will" that is neither materialistic nor idealistic in the strict sense of the word. This question is too complicated, if you don't study the history of philosophy, Nietzsche and Heidegger, I don't pay much attention to Nietzsche, so it's hard to explain, if you are interested in knowing, you can read Heidegger's "Nietzsche", of course, this book is difficult to understand.

However, many vulgar divisions in China simply classify Nietzsche as idealists, of course, this is a very unfounded statement.

Nietzsche was influenced by the German philosopher Schopenhauer (Chinese name), and his ideas should theoretically belong to idealists, dominated by spiritual will, and then material, materialism, dominated by matter, followed by spiritual will.

Except that idealism and materialism are only the most cursive divisions, if you read Heidegger's book, you will find that it does not involve idealism and materialism at all. Idealism and materialism are only the cursiest divisions.

Early existentialism

If you look at him from an idealistic, materialistic point of view, you will find that he is no different from those people in mental hospitals! ~!

Idealists compare themselves to the sun, which brings light and heat to people.

A famous, typical idealist.

Idealists, of course.

Otherwise, can you be considered a philosopher?

Is Nietzsche the sun, he himself said.

Nietzsche believed in "voluntarism", and the "will" in this is actually consciousness, so he is an idealist.

It's simply synonymous with idealism, what else to ask.

Famous saying: I am the sun. I can't remember the rest of it.

Heraclitus (c. 530 BC - 470 BC) was a famous materialist philosopher in ancient Greece and the founder of the Epheus school. He was born into a royal family in the city-state of Epès in the Ionian region. He was supposed to inherit the throne, but he gave it up to his brother and went into seclusion near the temple of the goddess Aldimes.

It is said that the Persian king Darius once wrote to invite him to teach Greek culture at the Persian court. Heraclitus arrogantly refused. He said:

Because I have a fear of eminence, I cannot go to Persia, and I am content with the small things that my heart has. There is also an anecdote about playing dice with children all day long. He said to the onlookers:

Why? So that you can nag! These anecdotes, while not entirely credible, suggest that Greek philosophers had begun to detach themselves from public affairs.

In fact, Heraclitus was not completely out of politics either. When the city-state of Efes banished his friend Helmodorus, he exclaimed, "Every adult in Efes had better hang himself, leaving the city-state to his innocent youth."

He called on the people to defend the law and eradicate tyranny. It is said that when he lived in seclusion, he lived on grass roots and plants, and he contracted edema. He went to the city to find a doctor, and asked him in a dumb way if he could make a rainy day dry.

The doctor didn't understand what he meant. He ran to the cattle pen and tried to use the heat of cow dung to suck the water out of his body, but to no avail, and died at the age of about 60.

Imagination is idealism, and it is materialism when it becomes reality.

The scientist Newton Edison first imagined what that thing looked like, and then studied it. Before he studied it, he taught it to others, and others laughed at him, saying that he was mentally ill, and then he would rise to politics, saying that he was idealistic, and initiating the masses to criticize him.

In fact, Marx was also idealistic, and communism was his imagination. The communist society he imagined was not realized, it was not a fact, and it could only be said to be a fact on the day it was realized.

Why do so many philosophers lean toward idealism?

Hegel was a materialist.

Hegel is du German classical philosopher.

Representative of Zhixue, political DAO philosopher. He made the most systematic, richest and most complete exposition of German autocratic philosophy, established the largest system of objective idealism in the history of world philosophy, and greatly enriched the dialectic.

Contemptible view, Hegel bai

Whether it is idealistic or materialistic, it is not who has the final say, everyone has a different understanding, although many of them are adhered to the views of other people, after all, they are just biased comments.

People who grew up under the influence of Marx's so-called doctrines often think that Hegel is idealistic, and those who have been instilled by that set of doctrines since childhood rarely have the views of true understanding and real understanding. It seems to me that all "social sciences", including Marx's "scientific socialism", have an element of idealism, and Hegel is certainly no exception. Subjective feelings are much stronger in Marx than in Hegel, and it is actually more inconclusive who is more "idealistic" than whom.

In the "dialectics of history" that he founded, Hegel had a more objective and rational analysis than any other philosopher, and in this respect he was more materialistic than anyone else. It is unwise not to sum up a person in one sentence and one word, and to label him as history.

Today we are going to talk about the ideas of two great philosophers in history, one is Kant and the other is Hegel. Both philosophers were German, Kant was the founder of German classical rationalism, and Hegel was the philosophical master of idealism. What is Idealism?

What is Classical Rationalism?

Hegel-naïve objective idealist.

Hegel Bai is exquisite.

Idealistic philosophers, zhi is an objective idealist if he refines himself. dao

The so-called refinement refers to the large and systematic system of the ideological body of specialization. In philosophy, naïve has its special use, that is, to illustrate the simplicity and intuitiveness of a philosophy, such as naïve materialism, which generally attributes the origin of the world to one or several substances, such as Thales's water is the origin of all things. It is absolutely inappropriate to use it in Hegel.

"Idealism" is just a hat that has been put on them since a particular historical period. Those who have carefully read a little history of philosophy and the original works of philosophy will find that it is actually very far-fetched.

Like Descartes, he could only be a "dualist" at best;

Kant was fundamentally agnostic, and if he wanted to say that he was idealistic, he would have to say that he was "transcendental idealism", which was very different from the so-called idealism in general.

Freud was not a philosopher at all, he was a psychologist. In the past, analyzing his psychological views, it was simply impossible to rigidly set materialism and idealism. It cannot be said that he is materialistic or idealistic at all.

There are also many great figures, who are materialists, such as Hobbes, Feuerbach, Marx.

Many of the great philosophers of the 20th century were, by and large, neither materialistic nor idealistic – uninterested in ontology.

Arthur Schopenhauer was idealistic, Feuerbach was materialistic, but he fell into idealism when it came to solving some problems.

Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) was a famous German philosopher. One of the founders and main exponents of voluntarism. In terms of outlook on life, influenced by Hinduism and Buddhism, he holds a pessimistic view and advocates selflessness.

Schopenhauer was born in Danzig, Germany (present-day Poland, renamed Gdansk) to a family of bankers. His father, Heinrich Floris Schopenhauer, was a very successful businessman who died of drowning. Her mother, Johanna Schopenhauer, was a well-known writer of her time, and she was associated with Goethe and other great writers.

His relationship with his mother has always been bad, the estrangement is very deep, and finally the relationship broke down. Schopenhauer inherited his father's fortune and gave him a life of affluence. After Schopenhauer's death due to worsening pneumonia, he donated all his fortune to charity.

He can be seen in many books.

Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (28 July 1804 13 September 1872) was a German philosopher. Born in Landshut in the capital of the Lower Byrne district of Byrne (Bavaria) and died in Nuremberg in the same state, he was the fourth son of the German jurist Paul Johann Anselmlitt von Feuerbach.

Feuerbach.

It is a materialist copy.

But in the settlement of one.

When I hit some problems, I still get into bai

into the idealistic du

Schopenhauer didn't need to say.

Absolute idealism.

Hegel is the dialectic of DAO idealism.

So it's still idealism.

Nietzsche, not to mention idealism.

Combine these.

I think Feuerbach is a little more materialistic than them.

Hehe, landlord, you are very stingy.

Schopenhauer was idealistic.

Feuerbach was mechanical materialism.

Generally so.

Press the horse's point of view.

Uncle idealism. Fei materialism.

The discussion of ontology is out of date.

A: I'm a student in my second year of high school, and I've just studied philosophy, but I don't know whether idealism is right or materialism is right.

B: There is no right or wrong, as far as I am concerned, but the way of looking at the world is at a different level, do you see any philosophy book that says "right or wrong"?

C: The philosophical answer is not a certainty, it just depends on how you understand it. In my personal opinion, neither idealism nor materialism can fully explain the origin of all things, nothing more.

Ding: Yes, the textbook is not infallible, but it is authoritative.

B: Don't care what the teacher says. Textbooks classify metaphysics as materialism, but everyone knows that Hegel is the master of metaphysics, and his philosophy is idealistic. Distinguishing whether a philosophy is "materialistic" or "idealistic" is not fundamental.