The third year of high school ancient history questions the master to help pull

I'll tell you, the upstairs didn't make it clear.

The two tax laws do not abolish the poll tax, the poll tax still exists, it only reforms the household tax and the local tax, and the tax does not focus on the number of people, but it does not take the number of people into consideration. If the poll tax had been abolished altogether, the book would have explicitly said "abolished the poll tax".

After a period of success, the two taxation laws quickly went bankrupt, because the calculation of assets and acres of land was a matter of great work, and the landlords could deceive them.

Therefore, you can see that in the Song Dynasty, there was still a poll tax, and the method of taxation was not based on the idea of the two tax laws, and it was still mainly based on people. The evidence is that Wang Anshi used the Fangtian Average Tax Law when he changed the law, which undoubtedly changed the tax system based on people at that time and turned to a land-based system, but after Wang Anshi**, the Fangtian average tax was abolished. That is to say, it is back to being the main man.

Therefore, a whipping law should still be shared according to the number of people.

As for the personal dependency, let's put it this way, if you are dominated by people, one more person in your family will have to pay more taxes, and you can't move at will, because you have to pay a poll tax, and people will be tied to the land, so it is the personal control of the feudal ** over the peasants.

It has changed the enslavement system based on people since the Warring States period"

It is not the abolition of the poll tax, attention"Main"Two words.

A whip law liberated the peasants from the land, indicating that the personal control of the peasants by the feudal ** was somewhat relaxed.

Relax. The degree of the problem, the increase of the two tax laws (should be) tax according to the acreage, it is not that there is no tax according to the population, you read the book carefully. In the past, taxes were paid according to the population, but now there are more taxes according to the acres of land, and there are more ways of taxation by the state, so it is not only dependent on people, so it is said that "there is some relaxation".

A clear whip law stipulates"The silver taels are divided according to the number of people and acres", but also in the way of diversification, but also show that the state taxation is no longer simply dependent on the people, the use of silver is more flexible, the tax system is gradually simplifying, like a whip law is to concentrate many tax items together, in fact, this problem should also extend to the Qing Dynasty's "apportionment into acres", not to people as the object of taxation, so at this time, the Chinese population has increased rapidly.

I'll tell you what I understand

First of all, is the question of whether the laws of the previous dynasty apply in this dynasty.

Secondly, is there really a conflict between the two tax laws and the whip law? This is the second question.

Again, the silver taels are shared according to the number of people and acres of land This article is more intriguing, what is the situation to share with the number of people, and what is the situation is based on the number of acres of land.

If you put aside the two tax laws, just look at the whip law of the Ming Dynasty.

It can also be said that it has changed the enslavement system based on people since the Warring States Period, indicating that the personal control of the peasants by the feudal ** has been relaxed.

It can be said that the law also changes with the times.

The emergence of the two tax laws only changed the situation of a single servitude system based on people since the Warring States Period, and did not mean that the poll tax was abolished.

As can be seen from the name of the whip law, it simplified all the tax systems into a single line, and this change indicates that the personal dependence of the peasants on the feudal state has been relaxed.

01 Xia Dynasty - Ancient Chinese History - Fan Fan Show.

Is the third year of high school so difficult? I suggest you flip through the books carefully.

Whether it is history or politics, it is said that "economy determines politics", and economy is the most fundamental reason. Then the collapse of the equalization system is due to the development of agricultural productivity, and the failure of the equalization system to meet the requirements of the development of productive forces leads to its collapse. In short, by the Tang Dynasty, the economy had developed significantly compared with that of the Northern Wei Dynasty (Northern Wei Emperor Xiaowen Emperor's reform, see Elective), which led to the collapse of the Juntian system.

The reason pointed out in the materials is that "the peace has been maintained for a long time, and the Dingkou nourishes the people", which means that the world in the Tang Dynasty was peaceful and the population increased, so that "the officials had no idle land" and the uniform field system could not be maintained. It can be seen that it is wrong.

It can also be used as an analogy to the root cause of the collapse of the Ida system.

We are both juniors in high school, help each other! ......o(∩_o……）

Although I am a science major, I don't understand it, and I can't do it, but I have a suggestion to buy materials and buy them with analysis in the future, and recommend the five-year college entrance examination three-year simulation or the three-year college entrance examination two-year simulation.

If you accuse people, it is promising, not natural. Isn't being promising the opposite of having no government in the country? The general meaning of these two sentences is that there is a reason for the disaster of the sun and the moon, and the reason is that the country has no government and takes the blame for the disaster of the sun and the moon, so it is important to be cautious about politics.

In general, the disaster of the sun and the moon has a cause, because the country has no government, and it does not come naturally. (It's just my own personal opinion, I don't know if it's right).

Election C means that people are obeyed and the country is mixed.

d.All of them show that if there is no way to govern the country, there will be a disaster of heaven damning the sun and the moon.

The answer is d, which is obviously the idea of heaven and man.

This passage is actually a materialist ideology, which negates China's traditional idea of the induction of heaven and man, and the central idea is that disasters are not predetermined by heaven, but are the result of personnel changes.

One day in the summer of the seventh year of Lu Zhaogong, there was a solar eclipse. At that time, people thought that there must be a disaster from heaven. The king of the Jin Kingdom asked Shi Wenbo which country the disaster would befall him.

Shi Wenbo said: "If the country has no government, and if it does not need to be good, it will take the disaster of the sun and the moon." That is to say, in Svenber's view, the "disaster of the sun and the moon" is only the appearance, and "no goodness" is the ultimate reason.

Only Wang Chong in C is materialistic.

He opposed the so-called "warning" that if you violate the will of heaven, you will suffer from it, and discussed that disasters in the natural world are only a natural phenomenon, not the wrath of heaven at all, and that heaven is just an inaction phenomenon in which "yin and yang do not know" and "qi does what it does". If there is, it is just made up by some people.

Note and d distinguish Dong Zhongshu is in favor of celestial induction.

c is about doing nothing and going with the flow.

1.At that time, China had begun to take shape on the scale of its current territory, so it was not specifically referred to as the Central Plains, and China specifically referred to the Central Plains, which had ended in the Yuan Dynasty.

3.Qing ** until its demise was used in the Qing Dynasty to exclude d

Generally, it is best to use the elimination method to do group selection history questions.

China, in ancient times, usually referred to the Central Plains, and has the same meaning as "China", "Zhongxia", "Zhongtu" and "Zhongzhou". In ancient times, the Chinese and Han ethnic groups were founded in the Yellow River Basin, thinking that they lived in the middle of the world, so they were called China. Later, it became the abbreviation for the exclusive use of our country.

Referring to the Central Plains is a common misunderstanding.

There is no problem with the second and fourth options, and the use of the word "China" in the third option does not mean that "Daqing" is not used

1. At that time, the Qing Dynasty still ruled the Northeast and other regions, not just the Central Plains.

2 The Qing Dynasty used the original name "China" for the first time since the founding of the People's Republic of China.

3. Qing ** After the Opium War, the name of "Great Qing" was sometimes used to the outside world.

4. What the Qing Dynasty exercises and upholds is China's sovereignty.

c For the first time, the Qing Dynasty used the original name "China".

Qing history foreign people into the Central Plains, the country name is "Great Qing", in the Sino-Russian "Nebuchu Treaty" with the expression of "China", can be reflected.

It shows that the Qing Dynasty exercises and safeguards China's sovereignty.

The material can be directly reflected that the "Treaty of Nebuchu" was the first border treaty signed between China (Qing Dynasty) and Russia, and it was also the first treaty signed between the Qing Dynasty and Western countries.

The first question, the Siku Quanshu is not historical data, choose D;

The second question, the Classic of Mountains and Seas, is a book dedicated to introducing various myths and legends in ancient China.

The third question, the core issue of the ancient Chinese ruling class was to consolidate the political power and ensure the throne for thousands of years.

Fourth, yes;

The fifth question is not only the difference in physical type, but also the difference in social structure, organization, culture, etc., no.