Radical and impetuous people and steady and conservative people who are suitable to be leaders

Everyone is more or less impetuous, first the imbalance in mentality is transformed into quick success in action. Without comparison or lack of competition, it is often difficult for us to motivate ourselves to improve, but if we only compare without facing up to the current step-by-step actions, this comparison can easily become a kind of lofty ambition. The thunder is loud, the rain is small, and the people complain every day, and they are cynical every day, entering a vicious circle.

Without meticulous craftsmanship, it is often difficult to produce high-quality products, and when you think that it is almost the same, it is often much worse. For software development, coding is a good example, if a functional module is only the main function can run, often this function is only 20% completed, a real function is completed and there are too many extension flows, exception flows, business rules, ease of use, security and performance issues to consider. Only when all of these are completed can a function be truly delivered to users.

We often fantasize that we can work efficiently in parallel, but this is often difficult to achieve, and only one thing can be truly effective if we only do one thing at a time. In practice, the productivity of serial is often higher than that of parallel.

Being radical, whether or not it can be implemented into daily action, is not a good thing. Being able to implement it may only manifest itself in impatience, while failure to implement it is a complete impetuousness. The road is long, its repair is far away, I will go up and down and seek.

So, it's hard to say who is better suited.

Many people change their personality immediately when they become leaders, is this the law of the industry? It turns out that the colleagues who are together, laughing and playing, bragging and chatting, and when he is promoted to a leadership position, you suddenly feel that your relationship is a little strange, not as free as before, you will say, people will change their faces as soon as they are broad, and their personalities will change as soon as they become leaders, is this really the case?

First, the responsibilities are different.

Second, the stance of considering the issue is different.

Employees think from the perspective of employees, leaders consider problems from the perspective of leaders, different classes, different positions, and even sometimes, he will become your opposite.

When I was just promoted as a leader, I encountered such a thing, during the Spring Festival of that year, the unit was in a hurry to complete an order and needed to work overtime, and the employees didn't want to add it, thinking that this colleague was also promoted by the employee, and he would definitely speak for the employee. Unexpectedly, he stood with the leaders and asked everyone to work overtime. Because of this incident, everyone was very hostile to him and felt that he had changed.

He is also very aggrieved, on the one hand, this is the order of the unit, as a management, he is unconditionally obedient; On the other hand, although overtime is very tiring, this order can bring relatively rich profits, and the leaders have to consider the operating efficiency of the enterprise to survive.

Third, the role positioning is different.

When he was still an employee, he might scold the leader with you, but when he became a leader, he would definitely not do it. A leader who is too approachable will either be a particularly large leader or will not be respected by his subordinates. Leaders must have the majesty and image of leadership, so that they can better exert their leadership ability.

Fourth, maybe he hasn't changed, it's because your eyes have changed.

It's also possible that it's your own psychology that's at work. He's still him, it's just that you think he's promoted, and it's different from you, so you think he's changed.

Personally, I think that power will change a lot of things, which is why many people will change their personality after becoming leaders, which belongs to a kind of human nature, and is not considered a law of the industry.

This is the law of the industry, because with the right, you don't need to put up with others anymore, and you will magnify your desires and start bullying newcomers.

No. It's just that because of the change in leadership status, some things can no longer be easily said. And you must be strict with your subordinates in order to convince the public.