What are the unreasonable, but legal regulations in real life?

Cases such as "After buying 150 bowls of cooked meat, it was reported that it was a three-no product, and the court awarded 50,000 yuan" and "A man in Beijing passed away, and his uncle helped repay the mortgage but could not inherit the property" and other cases are some legal but unreasonable real cases.

Here are some typical unreasonable but legal provisions:

1. Not registering a marriage and dating dozens of people at the same time does not constitute a crime!

2. In the case of divorce by litigation, whether the relationship between the husband and wife has broken down is judged by the court based on the evidence and statements provided by both parties!

One party feels that there is no emotion, but the other party thinks that there is still affection, and the court said that there is still the possibility of reconciliation, and it has not been broken!

3. In the case of the death of the debtor and the waiver of inheritance by the heirs, it is difficult for the creditor to find a qualified entity to pay off the debt.

According to legal logic, if the heir renounces inheriting the debtor's property, and does not inherit the property, of course, he will not deal with the debt, and the court is likely to reject the lender's claim on the grounds that the subject is not qualified. Even if the deceased debtor has property, it is difficult for the creditor to realize the claim.

Although the existing laws do have some unreasonable provisions, the main reason for the hot search phenomenon is that everyone knows too little legal knowledge, and I hope everyone will learn more about legal knowledge!

When you enter the elevator, you don't turn around, but face the crowd.

The barber shop washes hair without closing the eyes.

Clothes are only hung without twisting.

Boys go to the toilet to pee sweet double row.

1. Reasonable and illegal cases.

There is further information on the case of "three 123-year-old students robbing and killing a female teacher" in Shaodong County, Hunan Province. After being arrested, the three teenagers confessed that they found that there was only one female teacher guarding the school, so they discussed grabbing money and beat the teacher to death. **According to the report, Zhao led the female teacher out of the room and attacked the female teacher on the head with a wooden stick, and the three knocked the female teacher to the ground, and the female teacher got up and retreated to the toilet of her house to call for help.

The three continued to beat the female teacher in the toilet, covered the female teacher's mouth and nose with a towel, and forced them to ask where the money was stored. After that, Liu asked Zhao and Sun to cover the teacher to death and search for his belongings. Eventually, the trio hid the body under the bed in their bedroom, cleaned up the bloodstains from the scene, and fled the scene ......

The extreme, intentional homicide of the three teenagers is chilling. Normally, the crime of seeking money does not necessarily harm human life. Murder can be punishable by death, and the robber cannot commit murder unless he encounters strong resistance.

But in this case, the three teenagers beat the female teacher at the beginning, and then both sought money and killed people, without the slightest compassion and fear of crime, this kind of cold-blooded and cruel is extremely incommensurate with their age, and people with normal thinking cannot understand this kind of ** and violence.

The current news is that the three teenagers, all under the age of 14, are not criminally responsible according to the law, and will only be sent to the Shaoyang City Work-Study School, and their parents will bear civil liability.

2. Legal and unreasonable cases.

The annual Chinese Spring Festival transport, known as "the largest periodic migration in human history", has caused huge transportation pressure across the country in the short term, and even if more roads, railways and airports are built, it may not be completely alleviated.

As a matter of fact, if we do not follow the normal needs of social and economic development, it is also a great waste for the national economic development to build a large scale of construction and one-sided development of transportation infrastructure just to keep the Spring Festival transportation from being crowded.

It is expected that in the next few years, even if the dilemma of "hard to find a ticket" for the Spring Festival can be alleviated, it will not be completely solved. However, in recent years, a large number of private cars have entered the homes of ordinary people, and many people choose to drive home during the Spring Festival, which has alleviated the pressure on public transportation to a certain extent.

In this context, a call for "carpooling" of the hitchhiking action began to come into being, from the perspective of social benefits, the Spring Festival carpooling positive effect is quite a lot, not only in line with the current concept of low-carbon environmental protection, but also reduce traffic pressure, save travel costs, and even cultivate a sense of trust and intimacy between people, can be described as a multi-win.

However, such a spontaneous good action from the private sector has encountered a "reasonable, reasonable and illegal" institutional dilemma, if a certain amount of costs are shared when carpooling - although the probability is small, but there have been many similar cases - carpooling drivers may still encounter the stick of illegal operation and need to pay high fines.

The housework in the house is all covered by one person, which is legal but unreasonable; I didn't cook a meal well, but it wasn't delicious, so I threw it all outSometimes you have to think about it, lawful but unreasonable; Treat yourself to dinner, order more and eat less, and waste the leftoversWhy don't you eat so much?, lawful but unreasonable; The law is a threshold that enforces the protection of people's moral bottom line, and does not precisely stipulate the issues of fairness and unfairness, waste and non-waste. Too much social chaos has not reached the scope of legal sanctions, and it is unreasonable.

I was sick, I didn't go to the hospital to hire a barefoot doctor, he didn't have a medical certificate, and the illness was good, which was reasonable but not legal; But if something goes wrong, you will be held legally responsible, which is more severe than the medical malpractice in the hospital, based on:UnlawfulPractice. For example, a person can drive, but does not have a driver's license, and sees a driver on the road who is sick and wants to go to the hospital immediately, this person drives the driver to the hospital and the driver is saved, and this person is driving without a license is illegal, reasonable and illegal.

There are too many accidents in life, and in order to regulate real behavior, the law will put forward some requirements, but in reality, it is difficult to meet these requirements, or the actual situation is urgent, and these requirements are not allowed to be considered.

One is that the legal provisions are the most general behaviors that bind them, and do not include specific behaviors under extraordinary circumstances, and the other is that the degree of civilization is not high enough to formulate a perfect law.

Unless the legal system is guided by the theory of connection, the social practice of humanism, the phenomenon of legality and irrationality, reasonable and illegality will be minimized, becauseLinking theories and unifying spirits

In the relative spiritual world of the individual, even ifThe civilization of connection completely frames all ideas, covers the entire spiritual realm, and accurately measures all outcomesTherefore, we agree with the fundamental idea in connection, that things are given new meanings because of new life, that life itself is a process, and that what people really have is a process; The repetition of the life process of finding the spirit that truly belongs to oneself and pursuing ideals is not a stereotype, and it varies according to people's awakening.

The belief in different isms determines the acceptance or rejection of different ideas, and the ideologies [supported by ideas] are transferred with them, but it is unlikely to change the impulse to survive that nature gives to living beings, the innate sense of truth and goodness, and the consciousness and conscience evoked by the mutual feeling between the heart and the conscience of heaven and earth. withLinking civilization to objectively reveal the equivalence relationship of the target transaction and unify the conceptAwareness, the whole society believes in the doctrine of inevitabilityHumanism returnsAt the same time, the central form of the social overall effect of the legal system is maintained, which reflects the social conscience and the conscience of the people, so that the social ideology can remain upright, healthy, and perfect, and conform to the original intention of civilization, simplicity, integrity, righteousness, and justice.

1.environmental destruction, strengthen environmental protection, do a good job in legislation, and take practical actions.

2.Unreasonable demolition and relocation, standardize demolition and relocation, formulate relevant rules, and earnestly do a good job in urban planning.

3.Some people lack a sense of morality and carry out education on the socialist concept of honor and disgrace.

4.The backward concept of marriage pays attention to arrangement. Violates the law and does not meet the basis of marriage. Strengthen legal publicity.

5. Superstitious phenomena, pseudoscience, poisoning the masses, and strengthening scientific propaganda.

The biggest difference between reason and law is that the public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable. Reasoning varies from person to person, but in fact, the criterion is only whether it is in my interest and whether I can afford it. However, the law is uniformly stipulated by the state.

Therefore, in fact, there is no such thing as reasonable and illegal, because the so-called "illegal" but "reasonable" is only the reason of some people, and if asked by others, it is likely that it is both "illegal" and "unreasonable". Don't talk about it far away, just say that the lawsuit is unreasonable, and everyone who loses thinks it's unreasonable, but if you ask which side wins, you see that he thinks it's reasonable or not.

Therefore, judges should judge cases according to law, not on the basis of feelings. Some parties, the judge is actually very tired of him, but if he can stand up in law, then he has to win. On the contrary, even if you are sympathetic, you have to lose.

Because judges can't say that their feelings or preferences necessarily represent everyone, but the law is something that everyone must obey.

Having a rich advantage is reasonable and legitimate, and having no power and power is unreasonable and illegal.

This situation should not be a fact, everything is reasonable dialectically, as for legality, it is artificially set, and it is normal to contradict reasonableness, which does not need to be entangled too much.

1.Neighbors thin the walls – unreasonable and illegal;

The property cannot be managed - reasonable and illegal;

The property called me to call me also - legal and unreasonable;

He hit me first - it was reasonable and legal.

2.There is an old rich man, his wife is old and ugly, so he maintains a second wife, (reasonable or illegal), the old rich man paid his wife a lot of money to divorce in order to marry the second wife, (legal and unreasonable), and the second wife he reported used his money to cover the old handsome Xiaohuo, (neither reasonable nor legal).

3.Manslaughter, reasonable and unlawful.

In many unjust cases, because the righteous side has no evidence, the culprit goes unpunished. Legal and unreasonable.