Management Case Study The Failure of Famous Doctors Persuasion!

You can't save people because they heal them.

1) Fundamentally, it was due to Cai Huangong's failure to listen to Bian Que's advice. Bian Que reminded him again and again, but Cai Huan Gong did not listen to the opinions of his subordinates. From a management point of view, the leader does not listen to the reasonable opinions of his subordinates.

A "leader" like Cai Huangong can be said to be not a qualified leader in modern society. No rewarding power was used in the treatment of Bian Que.

2) This applies the knowledge of individual communication in management, which is the process of transferring relevant information between individual members to facilitate the coordination of behaviors and goals. In view of this problem, it is necessary to exchange views with each other, unify thinking and understanding, and consciously coordinate the work activities of various individuals. Therefore, Bian Que should try his best to communicate with Cai Huangong.

From shallow to deep, Cai Huan Gong may not be willing to listen at first. But Bian Que must say so. Some relevant examples can be given.

To a certain extent, it is possible to change the subject. At the same time, it is necessary to master skills in Cai Huangong's communication. I believe that Cai Huan Gong will definitely agree with Bian Que's view.

In this way, Cai Huan Gong will not lose his life. Thank you.

only focused on the statement from a medical point of view, and did not combine the personal characteristics of the king (neither understand medicine nor be stubborn) to carry out targeted persuasion.

Failure is the mother of success.

I don't know which category it belongs to, but it's similar to the old me.

If it was me, I felt that it was one thing to be wronged at the time, but I also had to reflect on whether I had too little communication with my subordinates. After all, leaders are also human beings, and it is impossible to see things all the time and think about problems very thoroughly, so we should communicate more with our subordinates, not only to understand the needs of our subordinates, but also to let our subordinates develop the habit of timely feedback when they have questions or suggestions.

Or, ask your subordinates what they think at a small dinner party (they may be easier to talk at the dinner table). In the future, this method of communication can be carried out at each small dinner.

1. He should formulate a corresponding system for rewarding and punishing the salesman, and then the consignor will still pay it.

2 Both are responsible, and athe is primarily responsible for misemployment; B's responsibility is to bear direct leadership responsibility, which is a dereliction of duty

3 A and B should be executed at the same time is the best, because management is an art, there is no one-size-fits-all management method, for the management method of the two factory directors, the enterprise has been developed they are successful. Because different industries, types of work, and different regions will have different management methods to adapt to; Managers' personal preferences and styles can also lead to different management methods.

1.He should check it himself so that he can find out the cause of the problem

2 Because they are one of the leaders of the installation project, A's main responsibility is poor employment, and B's responsibility is to have direct leadership responsibility

3 They are all right, because the situation of each factory is different As long as the factory can do well, their management methods are right

1 There are still salesmen, but he should develop a corresponding system to reward and punish salesmen

2 a's main responsibility is misemployment, and b's responsibility is to bear direct leadership responsibility, which is a dereliction of duty

It is best that it should be executed at the same time as B!

1 Still sent by the shipper.

2 Both are responsible, A is responsible for leadership and B is directly responsible.

3 b is correct, he is the general management principle of the enterprise, a is only a method of management.

1.It is still sent by the salesman, and the reason is checked. Put pressure on the salesman.

2。Both are responsible.

3.None of them are true. Each factory has its own situation, but it is not good to completely indulge the employees, and it is not good to be too strict. It's better to do both.

In fact, these three issues belong to the same category, and it is best to combine the concepts of the two directors of the ab and the director.

The idea of the DAOB factory director as a program put.

The right to think of the director of factory A is used as a specific detail, that is, to make employees feel responsible (such as the salesman in case 1) and to make them feel cared for (such as factory manager A). He will beat him with all his might, and he will have to rub it three times.

The plan is embodied in the setting of goals, the organization is reflected in the construction of the team and the setting of the organizational structure, the leadership is reflected in Wang Qiang's leadership of the company, and the control is reflected in the grassroots level of the managers.

Hello classmates, I am Mr. Min from Maritime University, please complete this homework independently, do not look for ** directly from the Internet.

(1) According to the above information, there is a clear difference in the leadership styles of General Manager Zhang and Deputy General Manager Tang.

General Manager Zhang is a guiding leader, he clearly tells his subordinates what they should do and how to do it, and requires their subordinates to be absolutely obedient to the work plan, and they are not allowed to make their own decisions and be out of shape;

Deputy General Manager Tang is a participatory leader, he and his subordinates make decisions together, and his role is to provide convenience and communication, and make specific arrangements for the construction design tasks and scientific research topics of the institute issued by the company on the basis of joint discussion by all staff. In the process, he pays attention to the expertise of each person, respects individual interests, and encourages everyone to learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses and collaborate with each other.

Deputy General Manager Tang's scientific research team has completed the income generation plan every year, and has made remarkable achievements in scientific research; General Manager Zhang's construction team labor efficiency and project quality have improved rapidly, and in the third year, the city also created a high-quality model project, which was commended by the city. Both leaders have proven to be effective in their leadership styles.

2) General Manager Zhang and Deputy General Manager Tang have achieved good results in their respective work, because they have adopted appropriate leadership styles. According to the leadership life cycle theory, each leader chooses the right leadership style according to the maturity level of his subordinates, which determines the success of the leader, so the leader must appropriately adjust his leadership style according to the level of his subordinates. In this case, Deputy General Manager Tang's scientific research team has a high degree of work maturity and psychological maturity, that is, most of the scientific researchers have skills and technical knowledge related to completing the task, and at the same time have high self-confidence and self-esteem, and the subordinates with high maturity have both the ability and confidence to do their own work.

Therefore, Deputy General Manager Tang's job as a scientific research leader is to respect everyone's expertise, mobilize their enthusiasm, and coordinate mutual relations. The construction team led by General Manager Zhang has a low maturity compared with the scientific research team, and most of the employees have a low level of education and have no professional training. Subordinates with low maturity levels either lack the ability to complete tasks or lack confidence, or they lack both.

Therefore, Mr. Zhang, as the leader of the construction team, must clarify everyone's tasks, strict requirements, and severe punishment in order to achieve the expected results.

Case studies of management, mainly:

1) Condense the main points in the case;

2) Apply the theories or principles of management to analysis;

3) judging what is right and wrong in the case;

4) Make suggestions for improvement.

The principle is combined with the materials in the case, and you can do it, don't think too complicated.

Combined with the knowledge of management, the analysis is as follows: 1. The mission of Mr. Jin's company is to quickly provide high-quality printed circuit boards to the society; 2. The opportunity in Mr. Jin's external environment is the customer's demand for new styles of existing products; The existential threat is that there is a demand for new styles of products produced by manufacturers of similar products and their existing products; 3. The advantage of Mr. Jin's company is that it occupies a certain market in Singapore and abroad, and is known for its high product quality and rapid delivery, and has a good corporate reputation. The weakness of Mr. Jin's company is that the existing product style and design are relatively outdated, and Mr. Xi, as the president, is relatively conservative about investment and corporate expansion.

The key to success is that Mr. Kim's company should seize opportunities and make the right decisions in a timely manner according to the changing needs of customers. 4. The "open system" mode of thinking refers to the enterprise (organization) as an open system rather than a closed system, is a subsystem of the entire social system, the enterprise (organization) inside and outside is a closely related whole, mutual influence, interaction, enterprises (organizations) should timely feedback the external environment changes in the information, in order to adjust themselves, adapt to the society. On the one hand, Mr. Jin's company should give full play to its advantages to improve existing products and reduce costs. On the other hand, according to the changes in market customer needs, we should adjust our business strategy, forge ahead in a timely manner, expand investment, and introduce new product models.

I'm sorry, but the question you mentioned doesn't belong to the category of project management, it's just a general management analysis, you can take a look at the basic marketing!