IQ EQ question, EQ is more important than IQ question how to ask

Number 1 should give a gem to number 3, number 5, number 7, and number 9 so that they will vote for him, because if they don't vote for him, they won't get any of them if they make a plan for number 2 instead.

This question should be considered starting with Pirate 10**. If there are two left on the 9th and 10th, then the 9th must have taken all the gems, and the 10th has no choice but to do so, because the 9th will definitely vote for himself. In this way, when there are 8, 9, and 10 left, as long as No. 8 is willing to give No. 10 a gem, No. 10 will naturally vote for No. 8.

And No. 9 naturally understands this truth, so when there are 7, 8, 9, and 10 pirates left, as long as No. 7 gives No. 9 a gem, No. 9 will vote for No. 7, because if you don't vote for No. 7, you won't be able to get one in the end. And so on, so as long as No. 1 gives No. 3, 5, 7, and No. 9 one gem each, they will definitely vote for No. 1.

11 for each of himself and 8 other people, 1 for the remaining one, and then it must be the last one who disagrees, and they throw him into the sea, and then they have to redistribute it because of the one gem left.

By analogy, the sum is with the side with more benefits, and there is only one person with less benefits, and that person will definitely die.

To the end in a duel.

No. 1: 5 No. 2: 6 No. 3: 7 No. 4: 8 No. 5: 9 No. 6: 11 No. 7: 12 No. 8: 13 No. 9: 14 No. 10: 15.

The first few must also be afraid of being thrown into the sea, and it doesn't matter if there are a few less, it's better than not dying, and they will definitely agree. The last few greedy ghosts also get more, and they should be satisfied.

Is that okay?

1 2 3 4 5 6 16 per person 7 8 9 10 1 per person Yes.

The first 6 were divided into 16, and the back 4 were divided into 1, and the 4 were certainly not convinced, so they threw 4 of them into the sea and then re-divided.

Is one enough, so greedy?

Dizzy, isn't it okay to divide 10 per person?

Wouldn't it be over if you give it all to me!

Question: Which is more important, EQ or IQ.

1 Emotional intelligence is more important than IQ.

2 Because emotional intelligence refers to a person's emotional and social skills, which can affect a person's performance in interpersonal relationships, workplace, etc., while IQ only refers to a person's intelligence level and cannot completely determine a person's success.

3 In today's society, where there is an increasing emphasis on interpersonal relationships and trustworthiness in teamwork, emotional intelligence is essential to one's success.

At the same time, EQ can be improved through constant shouting and learning and exercise, unlike IQ, which is generally fixed.

Therefore, we should focus on cultivating our own emotional intelligence to achieve better personal development.

Emotional intelligence is more important than IQ, and emotional intelligence is generally a very important manifestation in interpersonal communication and interpersonal relationships. People with high emotional intelligence are very popular, and their circle of friends is particularly extensive. will make the feng shui of your life rise.

It would be better if the EQ is high and the IQ is also high. If it's a question, it should be asked. What is more important in sociology and interpersonal communication?

Summary. Personally, I think that emotional intelligence is not a part of IQ, EQ is the efficiency of the ability to control and care for emotions, and IQ is the efficiency of obtaining the ability to comprehend and apply objective things and laws. The ability to grasp these two aspects is certainly applied in different fields.

Personally, I think that emotional intelligence is not a part of IQ, emotional intelligence is the efficiency of talking about the ability to control and care for emotions, IQ is the efficiency of obtaining the ability to comprehend and use objective things and laws, it is obvious that human emotions are illogical, which is fundamentally different from objective laws. The ability to grasp these two aspects is certainly applied in different fields.

So no.

I hope I can help you, thank you for your consultation and trust, I am happy to answer for you, if you have any questions, you can always ask me at any time, I will shoot you immediately when I see it. Have a great day! Hope to get your praise for the sedan <>

EQ and IQ may not both solve the problem.

But the middle companion is helpful to solve the problem.

EQ and IQ are two interdependent things, and only when they are played well can the problem be solved.

Can both EQ and IQ solve the problem? Both EQ and IQ can solve the question-and-ask chain. EQ is high and IQ is high. This person is envious of his grandson, and it is better to be able to send things around.