In language expressions, what is the difference between argumentation and explanation Language is go

Argument: Argument is when the writer expresses his opinion on a certain object of discussion in order to express his or her views and attitudes. Expressing one's own views and opinions on people or things through methods such as telling facts and reasoning is usually highly subjective.

Its function is to make the article clear and profound, with strong philosophical and theoretical depth. In the discussion, it is the main expression; It is also often used as an auxiliary means of expression in general narratives, expository essays or literary works.

Description: Explanation is a concise and concise way of explaining the shape, nature, characteristics, causes, relationships, and functions of things. Some of the objects to be explained are physical things, such as mountains, rivers, plants, stationery, buildings, utensils, etc.; Some are abstract truths, such as thoughts, consciousness, cultivation, opinions, concepts, principles, techniques, etc.

Your example is Argumentative. Because it is the opinion of the published author.

Of course, there is a difference between argumentation and explanation, and the difference lies in the meaning of the two terms themselves, which can be known at a glance. However, it is important to understand that it is not just a sentence to distinguish between them, whether it is an argument or an explanation, it is necessary to look at the expression of a complete meaning of it to be determined. Judging only from a sentence that does not have a complete meaning, this is close to the ancient pedantic winter coaxing.

Exemplary argumentation: cite conclusive, sufficient, and representative examples to prove the argument;

Reasoning argument: use the incisive insights in the classic works of Marxism-Leninism, the famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and the commonly recognized theorems and formulas to prove the argument;

Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments of the West, and prove the argument in the comparison;

Figurative argument: Use well-known things as metaphors to prove an argument. In addition, in the rebuttal arguments, the method of refutation of "the spear of Er, the shield of the attack on the edge of the enemy" and the "method of reducing the fallacy" are often adoptedIt is often used in combination in the majority meeting.

Inductive argumentation, also called "factual argument".It is a method of demonstrating a general conclusion by giving specific examples.

Deductive argumentation, also known as "theoretical argumentation", is a method of arguing individual cases based on general principles or conclusions. That is, to justify the argument of particularity with the argument of universality.

Analogical argument is the method of deriving examples of similar things from what is known, that is, the method of argumentation from the special to the particular.

Causal argumentation, which proves an argument by analyzing facts and revealing the causal relationship between the argument and the argument. Causal arguments can be based on causality, or causal evidence, or causal evidence, or mutual causality.

Common methods of illustration include definition, interpretation, comparison, analogy, categorization, examples, columns, columns, charts, etc.

Descriptive method: It is a technique that uses vivid language to depict characters or scenes.

According to the content, there are two kinds of descriptions: character description and scenery description. There are six main methods of character description, namely, general description, portrait description, language description, action description, psychological description, and detail description; There are three types of scene descriptions: static and dynamic, objective and subjective, contrast and contrast.

According to the characteristics of the classification: 1 white drawing, the so-called "white drawing" refers to grasp the main characteristics of things, and in concise language to outline the image of a way of writing, Mr. Lu Xun is very good at using white drawing techniques, such as "Mr. Fujino" in Mr. Fujino's introduction: "At that time came in a black and thin gentleman, with a beard, wearing glasses, carrying a stack of large and small books.

As soon as he placed the book on the podium, he introduced himself to the students in a slow and abrupt tone: "I am the ...... called Fujino Yankuro." The language is concise and impressive.

2. Fine drawing, fine description refers to the fine carving of a stroke of things, relative to the white drawing, the fine description can also be called a fine brush, such as Ary's "One Side" written by Lu Xun is finer than Lu Xun wrote Fujino: "His face is yellow and black with white, so thin that people are worried, like a person who has just recovered from a serious illness, but his spirit is very good, and there is no decadence." The hair was about an inch long, and it was evident that it had not been cut for a long time, but it stood on end one by one.

The beard is very eye-catching, as if the 'one word' written in thick ink. ”

Differences: 1. Target.

First of all, they are all verbs that initiate people, and express to others what you know or what you know through words or words. But there are differences in the degree of expression and attitude.

1. Describe more visually, pay attention to the characteristics of things;

2. The expression is more colloquial and daily;

3. Discourse needs dialectical arguments to express opinions;

4. The narrative usually refers to the fact that others are informed of the whole incident;

5. The elaboration should be more detailed than that;

6. The statement is to express the views and theories of the parties in an orderly manner.

2. Interpretation. 1. Description.

Descriptive, using a variety of rhetorical devices.

Visualize things.

The figures of speech included are figurative, anthropomorphic, exaggerated, and puns.

Ranking, etc., can describe people, can also describe things, through the description can make people or things more vivid and concrete, give people a clear feeling.

2. Expression. Expression refers to the oral description of an individual's observations of a certain actual characteristic.

3. Discourse. Discourse is a theoretical description, which refers to narration and analysis.

Example: Song Ouyang Xiu.

Study. Poem: "I am quite discursive in my life, and I add a little bit of channeling." ”

4. Narrative. In life, the so-called narration is to record or tell the story of the event. In theoretical research, narrative is to reproduce the research results theoretically in a certain way.

In literature, narration is the most frequent method of expression used in writing, and it is also the most basic way of literary creation, and all kinds of literary styles must be used more or less.

5. Statements. Statement means to say, narrate, refers to the orderly expression of things, facts, or the speaker's ideas and opinions.

6. Elaboration. Clarification of statements, detailed explanations, statements, expositions.

The difference between description, argumentation, and illustration:

Description: It is the use of description methods to describe, description methods: portrait description, language description, action description. Argumentation is the use of argumentative methods to describe.

Argumentative Method: Exemplary Argument, Rational Argument, Comparative Argument, Metaphorical Argument, Symbolic Argument Explanation, is the use of illustrative methods to describe.

Illustrative methods: examples, numbers, analogies, categories, comparisons, quotations, diagrams, definitions, interpretations, imitations, interpretations, diagrams, quotations.

Descriptions are divided into character descriptions, scene descriptions, and arguments, arguments, and explanations.

It is generally the method of discourse of the essay. It is also a method of expression for literary creation.

Argumentation is a kind of expression of analysis and reasoning. A complete argument or paragraph usually consists of three elements: an argument, an argument, and an argument. There are two main types of arguments, namely "arguments" and "refutations".

Arguments are called "proof" articles, and rebuttals are called "refutation" articles. Argumentation is a major form of writing that requires clear arguments, well-founded arguments, and well-reasoned arguments. The characteristic of argumentation is to convince people with reason, to use the method of reasoning, and to directly analyze, comment, and prove objective things in the form of logic, such as concepts, judgments, and reasoning.

In daily life, people often use arguments, long and short, and right and wrong. When writing, it is more important to make arguments, promote ideas, and clarify theories to influence readers.

Comment and discuss an issue; Comments expressed during the discussion Detailed explanation 1It is to comment on the right and wrong, high and low, good or bad of people or things. It also refers to criticism and criticism. "Historical Records: The Biography of the Goods and Colonies".

Linzi and Haidai are also a metropolis. Its customs are broad and broad, and they are wise and eloquent. Northern Qi.

Yan Zhitui "Yan's Family Motto: Mianxue": "And there are auspicious and evil events, discussing gains and losses, and opening your mouth openly, like sitting in the clouds." Ming Xue Xuan's "Xue Zi Dao Treatise" volume: "You must not follow the crowd to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of your predecessors, but you must treat yourself as if you have true opinions." Wei Wei.

Chapter 25 of the fourth part of the East: "I have never talked about you behind my back, nor have I said a bad word about you." ” 2.

Ming Zodiac Zhou, "Jiehuan Yuan Gong Biography".

Gong (Yuan Keli) said: "In recent years, there have been many discussions, and the words have been fierce, causing more than 100 people to be angry, and there are more than 100 people who have been reprimanded. 'Ba Jin.

Past Events and Caprice Postscript to the Translation: "This kind of discussion that the author publishes at any time and everywhere may not be correct even when I look at it at the time. ”