How to highlight your shortcomings in the interview?

You can praise yourself through self-criticism. For example, if you can't help but say something when you see something wrong, it may embarrass the customer. But you explain it to him afterwards, and then you're the same as before.

As someone who interviews regularly, let me talk about my thoughts. Most of the time, companies ask you what your shortcomings are in order to get a better idea of whether you are a good fit for the company and the position, so don't take it too seriously. After all, if you work in a company, even if you hide your shortcomings in the early stage, they will be exposed in the later stage after the interview, so the company will think that you are not suitable for this position and this type of company.

If I had to ask, I could say that I did have shortcomings, such as low efficiency, lack of perseverance, etc. But after coming to the company, I feel that I am qualified for this position, have made some progress, made some contributions to the company, and lived up to the company's expectations and cultivation. In addition, you can talk about some of your shortcomings when you introduce yourself, so that the interviewer can understand your shortcomings and abilities, which is conducive to the smooth passage of the interview.

Let the interviewer make a special impression on you. Maybe maybe one in ten. Work can be based on work enthusiasm, work feedback rate, and work attitude.

As well as the handling of emergency work and other aspects to show their enthusiasm, attitude and other advantages.

In terms of learning, I can talk about the charging of professional skills, the development of business knowledge, and the blog forums that I like to browse. What if the interviewer happens to cross paths with you, you can briefly describe your life according to your actual situation. You can showcase your interests, hobbies, etc.

Cons: Name your shortcomings during the interview. Of course, don't expose the interviewer to something that might give you extra points.

You can choose a few shortcomings that are not caused by your attitude or laziness, acknowledge the shortcoming, and show that you are trying to correct your attitude. There are deficiencies in the work, such as "non-standard format and annotations" and "insufficient ability to write project documents", which can be changed through their own efforts.

Admit and correct it calmly, and even get a positive evaluation. In my personal experience, the interviewer asks you this question to understand your real situation and see if your qualities meet the company's hiring standards. Truth is the most important thing.

Of course, when you're there, you can subtly explain some of your strengths, reach out to the job you're applying for, name your strengths, and then your weaknesses can pass. And let the other party feel that you are full of confidence, and give the interviewer the feeling that I can do the job, and I can do it well, of course, the probability of admission is greater. Never always explain your merits, as this will give the impression that you are arrogant.

When talking about shortcomings, you should summarize and concentrate, don't talk in generalities, don't have too many shortcomings to describe, and deny yourself too much, which is obviously modest, and will also affect the examiner's judgment. It is better to illustrate the problem with examples. Talk about a weakness that is already being corrected or that you have a clear plan to correct, especially a weakness that you can fully demonstrate that can be solved in the near future, or a weakness that you can correct using your strengths and bring out an advantage by the way.

When you can also say that you also have some shortcomings, but don't magnify them infinitely, you can mention them appropriately, and then you should also show that you will correct them.

You can talk about some inconsequential shortcomings, and you should show your attitude and be able to change it in a short period of time.

At this time, how to clever your shortcomings? This can be alluded to by your shortcomings to the fact that most people have such shortcomings. It won't magnify your shortcomings and turn them into a universal problem.

It should be said: my shortcoming is that I am a little impatient when it comes to things. But in the future, I will try my best to make up for this shortcoming, and I will try to correct it and contribute to the company.

You need to comprehensively evaluate the specific requirements of the position you are taking the test and identify your shortcomings according to the requirements of the position.

When an interviewer asks a test taker this question, the interviewer does not want to know the candidate's real shortcomings, but wants to test the test-taker's resilience through this question. To a certain extent, if the test taker can be appropriate for this question, it means that the test taker can face up to his own problems and have the ability to make some workplace flexibility. As for the question you asked, I would like to answer it from the following aspects.

One, you can't twist and pinch.

Many newcomers are embarrassed during the interview, and some are shy in their personalities. When the interviewer asks about the candidate's shortcomings, the candidate will feel embarrassed and even feel ashamed to talk about his or her shortcomings. In professional life, all people are adults, and test takers must abandon student thinking and be generous.

Second, you can't be unrelated to the shortcomings.

Some people place too much value on their privacy, and when this question is asked, test takers choose to avoid talking about worthless shortcomings. For example, I like to eat leeks, or I don't like to sing. Such drawbacks have nothing to do with the job the candidate is interviewing for, nor is it the answer that the interviewer wants to hear.

It was also the case that if you chose to avoid the heavy too much, it was actually a minus behavior. <>

3. You can choose to be moderately honest.

You don't have to be all honest, but you also need to be careful to control the authenticity of your conversations. For example, if you are applying for a sales job, you can say that your shortcomings are shy, although you are very shy, but you are a very careful person, and you also believe that you can make yourself more cheerful through hard work, and your carefulness can also become an advantage of your work. In this way, you not only tell your real shortcomings, but also give solutions and an assessment of your shortcomings, and the test taker will appreciate you.

The interviewer asks about your shortcomings, which is a routine question to examine the candidate's psychological quality in a dilemma and to see the candidate's level of self-awareness. In this case, try to treat the disadvantages as advantages, but it is important to note that the disadvantages must be negative.

If the interviewer asks me what my shortcomings are during the interview, then my shortcomings are that I am a bit introverted, relatively quiet and meticulous in my work.

If you are asked about your shortcomings during the interview, you should not tell the truth, after all, only the person who knows you best is a person who is good at analyzing problems, and the more detailed you say. Maybe the better your chances of passing.

At this time, you should be positive, and don't choose to hide when you have a problem, but don't say too much at once, and you can also talk about some of your own advantages later.

I think it should be clear that in this way, I will leave a very sincere feeling to the other person, and I will also leave a very good feeling and impression on myself.

Then you should take the initiative to tell the other party, and you should also explain it in detail, so that you will leave a good impression on the other party.

When interviewing shortcomings, pay attention to avoiding misunderstandings, following the principles and summarizing well.

1. Avoid two misunderstandings

1. Describe shortcomings as advantages in disguise.

The interviewer's IQ is generally not so low that he can't even understand the "voiceover" in it, so for this, the interviewer will not only not think that you are smart, good at expression, and quick thinking, but will think that you are too fake to face up to your own problems. So, in the interview, don't try to disguise your shortcomings as advantages, this is outdated.

2. It is too real and exposes a fatal flaw.

Although such a statement sounds true, these shortcomings are fatal, and they are the last thing that bosses and colleagues want to see. Therefore, in the interview, don't be too real and expose your shortcomings, after all, this is a selection interview, not self-criticism.

Second, there are two principles that need to be grasped when talking about shortcomings

1. Try to talk about the shortcomings of knowledge and skills, and less about the shortcomings of personality and personality.

The interviewer usually examines the candidate from shallow to deep, from the surface to the inside, following the structural characteristics of the iceberg model.

In the iceberg model, the part above the iceberg is shallow and superficial, and it includes knowledge, skills, etc. The part below the iceberg is deeper, a relatively hidden trait of a person, which includes values, personality, talents, ways of thinking, etc.

2. Try to talk about the shortcomings caused by objective reasons, and less about the shortcomings caused by subjective reasons.

A person's advantages are usually determined by subjective and objective factors, such as diligence, self-discipline, meticulous work, etc., which are determined by the subjective level of the individual, and experience, seniority, etc., these seem to be the advantages brought by subjective factors, but in fact they are inseparable from the influence of objective factors, because only after a certain number of years of work, it is possible to accumulate rich experience, and time is an objective factor.

3. Summary

In an interview, the odds of being asked "what are the shortcomings" is very high, and if you want to make a good impression on the interviewer, then it is best not to be clever and turn the shortcomings into advantages in disguise, and not to be too upright and expose your fatal shortcomings.

The best way to do this is to uphold the core principle of "just ignore the important", talk more about the shortcomings in knowledge and skills, the shortcomings caused by objective reasons, and less about the character flaws, and don't label yourself.

Hello dear! I'm happy to answer your interview shortcomings: Let's say you're interviewing for a technical position, you can say:

I think my biggest shortcoming is not good at fast communication, so I signed up for an effective communication course last year, hoping to master some communication skills through systematic learning. Or: "I think my biggest weakness is that my English is not good enough, so I enrolled in business English at xx institution at the beginning of the spring."

The only countermeasure is to be honest about your flaw, as long as it is not the "fatal wound" of the position you are applying for. At the same time, express your attitude of self-knowledge and self-transcendence.

First of all, I think you still have to express your strengths, for example, you are more serious in doing things, and you will be very firm in having goals. The disadvantage is that they are too persistent and stubborn.

You can have some inconsequential shortcomings that will not affect the work, and when you have advantages, you can ask for some advantages that are good for the work.

The advantages are very simple, you can say all your previous work experience or some achievements, as well as your own academic qualifications or some certificates; When you have shortcomings, you must avoid the three views problem, and you can say some things that are not conforming to your ability and are far away from the goal.

The interviewer can answer your strengths and weaknesses, the advantages are: helpfulness, and the disadvantages: the work style is too restrained and not bold enough.

Helpfulness is a simple traditional Chinese virtue. Everyone has a time when they are in trouble, and what they need most is the help of others. If everyone gives a little love, they will no longer see the anxious faces of others when they can't get help, and Lei Feng is a model of helpfulness.

The work style is too restrained and not too late, which bridge is bold enough, usually pays too much attention to details, ignores the grasp of the whole, and does not have enough experience in dealing with people. Theoretical study needs to be further deepened.

Do's and don'ts for interviewing for a job

It is better to dress neatly and neatly, and personal hygiene should also be done well. Then there are the questions about politeness, knocking on the door, saying hello, etc., and not interrupting the interviewer during the interview, and listening attentively, which is also a sign of politeness.

For the questions asked by the interviewer, you must think twice before answering, do not ask questions with emotion, and you must think about the content of the interviewer's exam before answering.

When leaving, don't be restless, anxious to leave, or go on another date before the interviewer finishes the conversation, as thinking about leaving too early will make the interviewer think that you are not sincere or impatient.

The interview asks about shortcomings, plans, and improvement measures.

When talking about shortcomings, in addition to being sincere and facing problems, we must also think about and improve the plan. Once you've talked about your shortcomings, be bold and tell the interviewer where you've made improvements and how you're doing.

Key points of the interview:

1. The interview starts with a good self-introduction (mainly based on expression ability, secondary on logical ability).

a.Articulate clearly, simple and clear expression.

b.Focus on what you are responsible for, not anything else (especially those that are relevant to the company and your strengths).

2. Preparation before the interview.

The main thing here is the understanding of the interview company, the trend of the industry in which the company is located, the understanding of the company's core products and the related products you are responsible for.

3. Incisive questions will add points.

a.For questions, no more than 3 are recommended. The first is that everyone's time is limited, and the second is that the simplification of problems is the embodiment of ability.

b.Be sure to ask questions, if there are none of them, it will often come across as if you are ill-prepared or have little interest in the company;

c.A good question can be a reflection of a person's level of expertise. Don't ask questions about confidential privacy, don't ask difficult questions, don't ask obvious questions. Of course, good questions need to be done and thought about in advance;

4. The main points of the problem.

a.Try to be concise and clear in expression, avoid long speeches, answer questions that are not asked, and have confusing logic;

b.In terms of content, you should reflect your professionalism and tell the content from a professional point of view;

5. Clear job assignment credit industry planning.

When looking for a job, it is advisable to take a long-term view, and from the perspective of company development and personal career development, money is indeed important, but it is not the most important. A good company or industry is worth your lower salary.

6. Finding a job is a two-way choice.

Not all companies submit resumes or go for interviews, people have limited energy, and you should focus on the interview opportunities that are promising or you want to go to.