What should an interviewer do when they ask, What are your shortcomings ?

1.You can't shy away from saying that you don't have any flaws, and you can't be too realistic and say all the flaws. First of all, never say fatal flaws, such as irresponsibility, carelessness, etc.

Of course, you shouldn't say this yourself; Secondly, that is to say, some shortcomings that are not necessarily shortcomings, such as working hard, but not paying attention to the combination of work and rest, or the pursuit of quality in work, efficiency needs to be improved, or the scope of learning knowledge is not wide enough, and learning should be further strengthened, etc.; Finally, you have to express your position, analyze yourself carefully, treat your shortcomings correctly, and strive to improve and perfect.

2.Say something unimportant about the "shortcomings". "Cons" is not the point. Everyone definitely has shortcomings, but they can't be the core competency requirements for this position. For example, the execution of the senior management.

No, strategic management capabilities at the strategic level.

Insufficient. These are serious injuries. So what are some of your shortcomings? For example, interviewing a graphic designer.

It's fair to say that my previous focus has been on static floor plans.

design. I sometimes feel uncertain when faced with a scene that requires dynamic effects, and I'm learning this technique myself. This doesn't mean that you're completely incompetent for the job, but it also shows that you're aware of your shortcomings and have improved through your studies.

3.Turn disadvantages into advantages in disguise. The interviewer's IQ is generally not so low that he can't even understand the "voice-over" inside.

Therefore, for such a situation, the interviewer will not only not think that you are smart, expressive, and quick-thinking, but will think that you are too fake to face your own problems. So, during the interview, don't try to disguise your weaknesses as your strengths. This kind of is outdated.

4.The strengths and weaknesses should be related to the position you are applying for. Of the things I've heard, most people tend to talk about things that aren't related to work.

In fact, they are afraid to expose their problems, or they have never seriously considered their strengths and weaknesses. The pros and cons of this question should be related to the content of the work. Let's say you interview a product manager.

Your strengths should be the ones that will help you do the job well. For example, I have good communication skills.

Able to communicate smoothly with various roles in business, operations, and development. Or rather, you're good at data analysis.

You can discover products through data** that can be optimized. The disadvantages, really embarrassing, should be related to work, not fatal.

I will tell each other about their shortcomings, and I will also tell each other that I am not particularly good-tempered in life, and that I am an acute person.

I think it's work experience, because you just come out of work now, and you are relatively lacking in work experience, as long as you are truthful, or talk about your shortcomings, such as not having those, these are okay, but you must tell the truth.

You should talk about your strengths as your weaknesses, and you should also say that you can correct them, so that you can have a chance.

There must be a manifestation of correction and progress, and there must be a solution to the shortcomings involved. The function of this example is to show that the shortcomings are facts, to highlight their own solutions, and to change their own strengths. My main weakness is that I work too much.

It's easy to overlook something. Sometimes I'm busy with some details or trifles. But I'm also looking for a solution.

Now I'll bring memos, which always need to work. The fact is that after recording, the serial number is selected to determine the order order, reducing the possibility of errors.

Understand the company culture and job responsibilities, and nothing can happen, especially when it is impossible to conflict with the job responsibilities. This requires us to carefully understand the positioning and responsibility of corporate culture, which is also the responsibility of this positioning and the responsibility of the same industry. I probably haven't gone into detail about HR.

Prepare for some disadvantages in advance. Applying for a management position can be said to be the need to improve one's technical ability, or it can be said to be able to express one's management ability and lack of communication skills. You can say you're not alive, or you can say you're taking it too seriously.

These are all the opposite of location matching without too many drawbacks. When applying for a technical position, it can be said that the demand planning is not perfect when you do it, and the PPT is not very good when you apply. These are not closed sections and positions, and even if they have these shortcomings, the interviewer will not be too impressed.

By the opposite direction, the distance indicates a disadvantage and has little to do with the job. Organize the language wisely, even when narrating the shortcomings. Again, different statements give a completely different view.

It's best to go straight to make up for your own shortcomings. My shortcomings are too serious, and the programmer itself needs to be rigorous and impossible to make mistakes, which makes me take my usual work too seriously. Everyone has their own shortcomings and shortcomings, and I think my shortcoming is that sometimes the pursuit of perfection can slow down the efficiency of doing things, and occasionally it can put pressure on my partner.

Strengthen collaboration with colleagues. Every job cannot be done by oneself, but requires the cooperation of colleagues to truly achieve perfection.

That is to say, there is a lack of personality or ability, because it is impossible for someone to be perfect in both aspects, and this is more conducive to coping.

I think my biggest shortcoming is that I am too good at learning, and I can take many things seriously.

You can seriously talk about some of your shortcomings, and then you can talk about how you can avoid these shortcomings from affecting your work.

My biggest flaw is that I pursue perfection too much, and I am more serious. ""I'm thin-skinned and don't say no to requests for help. "My biggest flaw is that I don't know enough about myself, and I haven't found any shortcomings so far.

Complimenting yourself in disguise is a clever act that will make the interviewer feel that you are unreliable.

Self-cognition is a psychological concept, which is called self-cognition in English, which talks about a person's self-observation and self-evaluation. In the workplace, self-evaluation is an evaluation of one's own behavior, expectations and personality, for example, if the leader promotes a person between you and Zhang San, what is your expectation of burning the spine, and what kind of behavior will you have during the inspection? Self-awareness not only has a great relationship with the work performance of employees, but also can eliminate a large number of unqualified job seekers through self-awareness when recruiting.

What are the disadvantages?

You can't say it's a shortcoming that you mind a lot about the position you're applying for.

For example, if you are applying for a finance position, if you say that your shortcomings are careless, then your interview is over. And if you are a financial person and you are still careless, I advise you to transform as soon as possible and change to a job that is more suitable for you. Then how should you introduce your own shortcomings, you have to introduce one, your position is not very important, unimportant shortcomings, and you have corresponding improvement measures.

For example, your disadvantage is that you were too thoughtful before, and the application that did not meet the requirements was returned directly without much communication, and now, you realize that it is okay to return, but you need to tell the other party why it is returned and what should be done, so you will tell the other party to improve the measures. It not only adheres to the principle of work, but also does not make others unacceptable.

Name one that is indeed a shortcoming at work.

However, it does not "hurt" much to the position you are applying for. For example, if you are applying for a driver's position, you can say that your organization and coordination skills are not good enough, and you are very slow to deal with strangers, etc., which are not valued by the other party in this position.

It will not happen often in your work, and the other party will pay more attention to your carefulness, whether you are familiar with the local road conditions, whether you have a strong sense of traffic safety, whether you can endure hardships, whether you have enough driving experience, whether you know the basic maintenance of the car, etc.

It is best to pay attention to this shortcoming and be willing to correct it.

It is possible to improve through your own efforts. For example, such shortcomings: planning is not strong enough, do not know how to relieve the pressure on work, and the details are not good enough. These are all work-related, but effective improvements can be made in a certain period of time through a certain method.

Conversely, if faced with the question "What is your greatest strength?" Such a problem, it is necessary to fit the characteristics of the requirements of the post, the number of rolling sections try their best to find their own advantages that meet the requirements of the post, to be appropriate, can not exaggerate, boast, the head of their own advantages to explain reasonably, the more specific the more points.

You can say that you are conservative and lack flexibility, and that you are easy to be careless in your spare time, but you can overcome these shortcomings, mainly according to the characteristics of the company.

I think we can solve this problem in a humorous way, and we can also respond to his questions in a humorous way, so that he won't think you have low emotional intelligence.

I should tell the other person that I don't know enough about myself now, and I'll correct it when I find out later.

When we participate in the interview, we will inevitably encounter some questions that we do not understand. At this time, some people may choose to insist on quibbling, while others will directly and honestly say that they don't understand. So, which way is better?

First of all, it is obviously unwise to insist on quibbles. Interviewers are not fools, and if you don't understand, they can easily tell. If you pretend you understand when you don't actually know how to bend, you will not only put yourself in an awkward position, but you will also leave a bad impression in the interviewer's mind.

In contrast, it is wiser to say that you don't understand. Doing so will not only avoid saying the wrong thing and giving the interviewer a misleading impression, but it will also show your honesty and humility. Of course, it is obviously not enough to simply say "I don't understand".

While saying that we don't understand, we also need to express our positive attitude so that the interviewer can see that we are willing to learn and improve. For example, we can show that although we are not familiar with the field, we are willing to learn and work hard to master this knowledge. Doing so will not only show your positive attitude but also allow the interviewer to see your potential.

Of course, if you encounter a problem that you don't understand during the interview, you don't have to express your position immediately. We can think about it a little after the interviewer asks a question to see if we can relate to the relevant content or similar experience. If you really don't understand, you can also check the interviewer's question first to see if you understand it clearly.

If you really don't understand, then be honest about yourself.

In short, the best thing to do in an interview is to be honest with the interviewer about yourself and express a positive attitude. Doing so will not only not bring negative consequences to yourself, but will increase your integrity and credibility, and leave a good impression on the interviewer, thereby improving your own interview success rate.