During the interview, the interviewer asks about the strengths and weaknesses, how should it be tact

First of all, I think you still have to express your strengths, for example, you are more serious in doing things, and you will be very firm in having goals. The disadvantage is that they are too persistent and stubborn.

You can have some inconsequential shortcomings that will not affect the work, and when you have advantages, you can ask for some advantages that are good for the work.

The advantages are very simple, you can say all your previous work experience or some achievements, as well as your own academic qualifications or some certificates; When you have shortcomings, you must avoid the three views problem, and you can say some things that are not conforming to your ability and are far away from the goal.

You can praise yourself through self-criticism. For example, if you can't help but say something when you see something wrong, it may embarrass the customer. But you explain it to him afterwards, and then you're the same as before.

As someone who interviews regularly, let me talk about my thoughts. Most of the time, companies ask you what your shortcomings are in order to get a better idea of whether you are a good fit for the company and the position, so don't take it too seriously. After all, if you work in a company, even if you hide your shortcomings in the early stage, they will be exposed in the later stage after the interview, so the company will think that you are not suitable for this position and this type of company.

If I had to ask, I could say that I did have shortcomings, such as low efficiency, lack of perseverance, etc. But after coming to the company, I feel that I am qualified for this position, have made some progress, made some contributions to the company, and lived up to the company's expectations and cultivation. In addition, you can talk about some of your shortcomings when you introduce yourself, so that the interviewer can understand your shortcomings and abilities, which is conducive to the smooth passage of the interview.

Let the interviewer make a special impression on you. Maybe maybe one in ten. Work can be based on work enthusiasm, work feedback rate, and work attitude.

As well as the handling of emergency work and other aspects to show their enthusiasm, attitude and other advantages.

In terms of learning, I can talk about the charging of professional skills, the development of business knowledge, and the blog forums that I like to browse. What if the interviewer happens to cross paths with you, you can briefly describe your life according to your actual situation. You can showcase your interests, hobbies, etc.

Cons: Name your shortcomings during the interview. Of course, don't expose the interviewer to something that might give you extra points.

You can choose a few shortcomings that are not caused by your attitude or laziness, acknowledge the shortcoming, and show that you are trying to correct your attitude. There are deficiencies in the work, such as "non-standard format and annotations" and "insufficient ability to write project documents", which can be changed through their own efforts.

Admit and correct it calmly, and even get a positive evaluation. In my personal experience, the interviewer asks you this question to understand your real situation and see if your qualities meet the company's hiring standards. Truth is the most important thing.

Of course, when you're there, you can subtly explain some of your strengths, reach out to the job you're applying for, name your strengths, and then your weaknesses can pass. And let the other party feel that you are full of confidence, and give the interviewer the feeling that I can do the job, and I can do it well, of course, the probability of admission is greater. Never always explain your merits, as this will give the impression that you are arrogant.

When talking about shortcomings, you should summarize and concentrate, don't talk in generalities, don't have too many shortcomings to describe, and deny yourself too much, which is obviously modest, and will also affect the examiner's judgment. It is better to illustrate the problem with examples. Talk about a weakness that is already being corrected or that you have a clear plan to correct, especially a weakness that you can fully demonstrate that can be solved in the near future, or a weakness that you can correct using your strengths and bring out an advantage by the way.

When you can also say that you also have some shortcomings, but don't magnify them infinitely, you can mention them appropriately, and then you should also show that you will correct them.

You can talk about some inconsequential shortcomings, and you should show your attitude and be able to change it in a short period of time.

At this time, how to clever your shortcomings? This can be alluded to by your shortcomings to the fact that most people have such shortcomings. It won't magnify your shortcomings and turn them into a universal problem.

It should be said: my shortcoming is that I am a little impatient when it comes to things. But in the future, I will try my best to make up for this shortcoming, and I will try to correct it and contribute to the company.

You need to comprehensively evaluate the specific requirements of the position you are taking the test and identify your shortcomings according to the requirements of the position.

When an interviewer asks a test taker this question, the interviewer does not want to know the candidate's real shortcomings, but wants to test the test-taker's resilience through this question. To a certain extent, if the test taker can be appropriate for this question, it means that the test taker can face up to his own problems and have the ability to make some workplace flexibility. As for the question you asked, I would like to answer it from the following aspects.

One, you can't twist and pinch.

Many newcomers are embarrassed during the interview, and some are shy in their personalities. When the interviewer asks about the candidate's shortcomings, the candidate will feel embarrassed and even feel ashamed to talk about his or her shortcomings. In professional life, all people are adults, and test takers must abandon student thinking and be generous.

Second, you can't be unrelated to the shortcomings.

Some people place too much value on their privacy, and when this question is asked, test takers choose to avoid talking about worthless shortcomings. For example, I like to eat leeks, or I don't like to sing. Such drawbacks have nothing to do with the job the candidate is interviewing for, nor is it the answer that the interviewer wants to hear.

It was also the case that if you chose to avoid the heavy too much, it was actually a minus behavior. <>

3. You can choose to be moderately honest.

You don't have to be all honest, but you also need to be careful to control the authenticity of your conversations. For example, if you are applying for a sales job, you can say that your shortcomings are shy, although you are very shy, but you are a very careful person, and you also believe that you can make yourself more cheerful through hard work, and your carefulness can also become an advantage of your work. In this way, you not only tell your real shortcomings, but also give solutions and an assessment of your shortcomings, and the test taker will appreciate you.

The interviewer asks about your shortcomings, which is a routine question to examine the candidate's psychological quality in a dilemma and to see the candidate's level of self-awareness. In this case, try to treat the disadvantages as advantages, but it is important to note that the disadvantages must be negative.

If the interviewer asks me what my shortcomings are during the interview, then my shortcomings are that I am a bit introverted, relatively quiet and meticulous in my work.

If you are asked about your shortcomings during the interview, you should not tell the truth, after all, only the person who knows you best is a person who is good at analyzing problems, and the more detailed you say. Maybe the better your chances of passing.

At this time, you should be positive, and don't choose to hide when you have a problem, but don't say too much at once, and you can also talk about some of your own advantages later.

I think it should be clear that in this way, I will leave a very sincere feeling to the other person, and I will also leave a very good feeling and impression on myself.

Then you should take the initiative to tell the other party, and you should also explain it in detail, so that you will leave a good impression on the other party.

When the interviewer asks me about my biggest flaw, I say: My biggest flaw is that I focus too much on organization and think about the order of everything first, which sometimes causes me to spend a lot of time getting one thing done. When an interviewer asks this question, he may think that your work experience does not match the job requirements of the interview, and he is hesitant.

This question is very important for the interviewer to eliminate uncertainty. Therefore, yours can be the disadvantages, but you must emphasize your strengths and relevance to the position, leading the outcome to the positive and allowing the interviewer to focus on the strengths and ignore the disadvantages.

When interviewing, it seems that there are often questions about strengths and weaknesses. This may seem like a difficult question, but it is actually full of small pitfalls. Applicants must think twice.

For interviewers, they don't like to be too formal, but if it's too routine and big, it's easier to backfire. How to grasp the extent of this problem is something that every candidate needs to consider according to the actual situation.

A conadvantage is a disadvantage. It does not mean that the advantages will become the disadvantages. Have the courage to admit your shortcomings and give practical examples to prove them.

There must be a performance of correction and improvement. Since we are talking about shortcomings, we must have a solution. The role of the example is to show that the shortcomings are real, highlight their own solutions, and say their advantages in disguise.

Be careful to avoid talking about your own lack of skills, such as I am not very good at Excel, not very good at PPT, etc. Even if you're really not skilled, you can practice more in your spare time. But if you take it out and tell the interviewer directly during the interview, it will give the illusion that there is no progress.

Before talking about the disadvantages, let's talk about the pros. First of all, before talking about the shortcomings, you can talk about your own strengths, and then change a disadvantage according to your own strengths, so if you talk about interview routines, it is best to think about this disadvantage in advance. Of course, you can't pretend that my downside is that I love to study and work too much.

It's so perfunctory that the interviewer will definitely be able to hear it. Therefore, it is best to combine your resume or work experience to talk about your own advantages first, and then talk about a sincere and harmless disadvantage.

I will avoid the important and trivialize, express it with more positive disadvantages and meanings, highlight myself, weaken my shortcomings, and at the same time inform the interviewer that I have the ability to overcome them, and turn the shortcomings into advantages, so that I can add points in front of the interviewer, and at the same time let the interviewer appreciate my own ingenuity.

You can tell others about your shortcomings directly, but you must ensure that you will further correct these shortcomings, and these shortcomings will not appear too much in the process of working carefully, you will strive to improve your own work ability, and you should avoid the important after this oak friend, and talk more about your career planning.

You can transform your shortcomings into some shortcomings of your personality, such as being more extroverted or introverted, and having a little carelessness in ordinary times, but you will correct it more, and the trembling shirt shows that you will resolutely correct your attitude.

It can be said that he is very meticulous, and everything must be checked more than three imitation belt times, such shortcomings can be prepared to affect their work efficiency, but the accuracy will be higher.

It can be said that there are several shortcomings of their own. But let's not say what the biggest drawback is. Because what is your biggest drawback? It's hard to judge.

When asking about your strengths and weaknesses, don't do it 100%, don't belittle yourself too much, don't boast too much, you can subtly tell how to face and overcome difficulties, you can give the interviewer an honest impression, no matter what question the interviewer asks, be sure to speak clearly. Be organized.

You can be a more optimistic and cheerful person, you can adapt to any pressure, you can also adjust your ability to work, the disadvantage is that your activity is not particularly good, you may not like some lively occasions too much, like a quiet atmosphere.

It should be direct to leave a particularly good impression on the other party, and the other party will also feel that his personality is particularly direct, and the other party will also feel that he is particularly reliable when he has anything to say.

You can say that my handwriting is not very good-looking, and this shortcoming is harmless, and the interviewer will not pay much attention to it, and it will also make the interviewer think that you are humorous.

I think it can be said that my heart is soft, too kind, and too easy to take some responsibility on myself, so that I will feel very tired.

Be positive with the interviewer's questions, but the answers should not conflict with your position.

Interviews are actually a very testing thing, sometimes the interviewer will ask the candidate what strengths and weaknesses they have, so how to calmly answer such a question? In fact, the reason for this problem is mainly to judge the candidate's expression ability, and everyone must understand the company they are interviewing before they can prescribe the right medicine.

The advantages can be said to be a person who is good at finding and solving problems, such as organized, regular, and tidy, these are all advantages that can be called their own, such as in a pair of documents, if they are sorted out by themselves, then everyone can easily find them, which saves a lot of time.

In fact, the interviewer also wants to understand whether the candidate's characteristics and the company match, don't say too cumbersome at this time, but tell the truth, minimize the drawbacks, time management, and efficient work, these are all advantages that can be called good, but the premise is that these things should be in line with themselves.

In fact, everyone should face up to their own shortcomings and advantages, when this problem, we can avoid the importance and humor to elaborate, everyone has shortcomings, so we can't say that we are too perfectAs long as you grasp a criterion, that is, the advantages are related to the work as much as possible, but the disadvantages are as unrelated to the work as possible, if you really don't know what to say, you can describe your hands-on ability and language skills.

Some job seekers may be more outspoken, will say all their shortcomings, thinking that this is the most real impression, this is not necessary at all, one or two points are enough, in short, the advantages and disadvantages are not too full. Of course, the advantages can be carried out for the position you are applying for, such as interpersonal communication, teamwork and execution, etc., you can pick some related to the work, but do not package yourself too perfectly.