The son pays for the monument or the daughter, and the son has no money to erect the monument for th

Times are changing, and it is no longer the exclusive right of the son to provide for the elderly, and the daughter will also contribute in this regard, or take full responsibility. There is some controversy about whether the son or daughter pays for the monument, but in fact, it mainly depends on the actual situation. After all, they are relatives, and the situation of each family is different, and it can also be discussed.

I have reservations about whether the son or daughter will pay for the monument, and we can pay attention to the tombstone ** and then make a reference.

Shanxi black tombstone.

Tombstone. At present, there are two main categories on the market: traditional tombstones and artistic tombstones. In addition to the main stele, traditional tombstones also have stele enclosures, railings, covers, covers, and pedals.

The stele is on both sides of the main stele, one is to strengthen the firmness of the main stele, and the other is to decorate the main stele, which is generally symmetrical design on the left and right. There is usually an arch-like shape on top of the stele, which is the roof, like the lid of the house. The railings are located on both sides in front of the main monument, presenting the tombstone as a relatively enclosed area.

Generally, on both sides of the railing, Hui'an line carving skills will be used to make some patterns, increase the aesthetics and auspicious meaning, the traditional tombstone ** is generally more than three thousand. Artistic tombstones are generally beautiful in shape, and the colors of the stone are rich and colorful. Get rid of the traditional tombstone boxy form, the diversification and customization of the form allows the personal symbols of the deceased to be reflected on the tombstone, of course, the superb carving technology also provides conditions for this, this kind of tombstone ** is generally in the majority of three to five thousand.

Stone tombstones. Modern tombstones.

In general, the tombstone ** is not particularly high, it is a practical product that we can all afford, and it is also a filial piety for us to be children. Therefore, there is no great discussion value for the son or daughter who pays for the monument, and we focus on the tombstone itself as the greatest blessing to the deceased.

I've seen this kind of thing. Same with you. They are saying that if there is a son, they will not allow their daughter to erect a monument. But the son is not filial. They asked their daughter's children to erect a monument to their grandfather. And engraved on the stele the grandson Jingli. I look good.

The son should erect a monument, and the daughter should not participate.

After all, it's your own children, don't worry about so much, just pay a penny, some places and some places.

Here it should be said with certainty that yes. Although her daughter is married, she is also her own child. If the parents pass away, the name of the person who erected the monument should be written on the inscription.

Such as: eldest son, second son. eldest daughter, second daughter, etc.

It shows that they are all filial sons and filial daughters. Please consider whether you are right or not. Good luck.

Under normal circumstances, the married daughter is not shared, the monument is to respect the elderly, and the brothers get along in harmony and contribute some money, which is not much according to reason, and it is not necessary to talk about it so true that they are all brothers and sisters.

It stands to reason that as long as the name of the married daughter is engraved on the tombstone, the tombstone payment should be shared, because this is a family matter, and the state has no regulations, so everyone can discuss it, if the cost is high, and the economic conditions of the deceased's son are poor, the married daughter should take the initiative to bear some expenses.

The sharing of the tombstone money is out of his heart, and he doesn't have to worry about it, so don't worry about the money for this last opportunity to show filial piety.

This should be apportioned, and the name of the daughter was also engraved on the monument when it was erected.

Yes! How not! As a daughter, this is absolutely necessary! It can only be said that the son is the main and the daughter is secondary!

Yes, because the daughter is also part of the family.

As long as it is a contribution to the family, it is okay.

It is also commendable.

Of course, because they are all children of parents, it is a filial piety, and if the son feels that he is not going, he can pay less.

This is a family relationship, and it is okay, and it is okay to highlight that it is the daughter who stands on the payment.

Yes, as long as the heart is there, it's not a big deal, you can lend your son money and let him buy it, that's fine.

Of course, this child, regardless of children, is the child of the elderly, and anyone can erect a monument.

As long as you have this filial piety, your son can pay for it if you don't have money, and your daughter can pay for it.

It stands to reason that the son should erect a monument, but in today's society, daughters can also erect, the times are different, men and women are the same, sons with sons erect, daughters without sons erect, the same.

Our custom here is that sons erect monuments to their parents. Now there is an only child in the generation, and that child can be erected as a monument.

If there is a son in our place, it must be the son who erects a monument.

One place has one custom, and if there is no son, then it is okay for the daughter to erect a monument.

In fact, erecting a monument depends on one's own will, whether it is a daughter or a son, as long as he has this will. That's it.

In the cash society, the average family is two children, one child, whether it is a boy or a girl, because the most is two children, or it is a daughter who erects a monument to her parents, there is nothing to say, daughters and sons can erect a monument to their parents in order to commemorate their parents.

Depending on the conditions, the monument to the deceased parents may be erected independently or jointly by the daughter or son.

I think it is okay to erect a monument to a deceased parent, whether it is a son or a daughter.

Generally, the family economy allows to have sons or sons, and there are many who are negotiated, and sons and daughters pay for the monuments.

This is not necessarily, some ethnic minorities are daughters, but most of them are sons, in fact, this is a family problem, many times it is possible to communicate and solve it by yourself, and it is enough to reach a consensus.

The old custom was that the son erected a monument. But now there are a lot of only children, sons and daughters.

Hello! "He who marries out spills water on you." Traditionally, daughters are outsiders, so their names are not included in the family tree. Erecting a monument is entirely a matter for the son.

Is it a daughter or a son to erect a monument to a deceased parent? Erect a monument to the deceased parents, daughters and sons, because there are many families that are all raised by their parents, so children should jointly erect a monument to their parents.

From the traditional culture, it is the son who erects a monument, because China has always attached more importance to the inheritance of the ancestry.

Of course, it was the son who went to erect it, because the son is the pillar of the family, and the daughter is married outside, and it must be her own son.

It's better to be a son, after all, it's a Chinese tradition, don't steal the limelight...

All the children contribute together, because each child's name must be engraved, so they have to contribute together.

It is the responsibility and obligation of each child to provide for the elderly, and to erect a monument to the elderly should be done within their means, as the old saying goes"He was unfilial in life, and screamed after death"The cost of erecting the monument, the family should discuss calmly, the family is good, the income is high, you can pay more, not to pay more and less to talk about filial piety. Home and everything is prosperous.

If the erection of the monument is a matter for the two sons, it is best for the two brothers to consult. Why do you want a son to send money? As long as your son is willing, it's okay to have no opinion, and it's better to value harmony in this matter.

Look at them, it's better to spend money together, if a son spends money, won't there be an opinion?

There is nothing wrong with this kind of thing, only two people. One party to the negotiation can agree, but the monument is still jointly funded by the two sons, after all, the old man is not his alone.

After negotiation, if one of them is willing to take it, there is nothing that cannot be done.

If there is an opinion, then share it equally.

It is certain that a large sum of money must be paid for the erection of the monument, and the brothers and sisters will each have an equal share, because the daughter and the son are equal.

Looking at the customs of various places, if they all add their daughter's name to pay for it, they will definitely come to it.

If you are willing to contribute some money, it is your own mind, and if you don't come out, you must pay it.