If you were an interviewer, how would you evaluate a candidate?

1. I am cheerful, sincere, optimistic, have a wide range of interests, be honest and honest, speak principles, do what I say, and never shirk my responsibility; Have self-control, always do things from the beginning to the end. Possess strong organizational skills.

and adaptability, and have strong management planning and organizational management coordination ability.

2. I am enthusiastic and cheerful, optimistic, have a wide range of interests, strong adaptability, get started quickly, be diligent and studious, down-to-earth, conscientious and responsible, perseverance, hard-working, and have the courage to meet new challenges.

Friendly, honest and humble. Diligent, conscientious and responsible, able to bear hardships and stand hard work, conscientious and patient. Affable, approachable, and good at communicating with people.

3. I am cheerful, active, optimistic, have a wide range of hobbies, have strong organizational skills and adaptability, and have good physical fitness. Get along well with classmates, be helpful, and be conscientious and responsible for their work. Be able to actively participate in activities organized by the school and class, and be able to play a full role in the activities.

4. Have a good psychological quality.

Perseverance and not afraid of competition. Be able to correctly understand and evaluate yourself, and accept the advice of others with an open mind. Be patient with your work, good at analyzing and solving problems. Good presentation and communication skills.

Gentle temperament, easy to cooperate with others, forming a harmonious cooperative relationship.

5. Have certain professional knowledge. Positive and enterprising, work attitude.

Serious, down-to-earth, responsible.

Strong, and have a strong team spirit and cooperation ability, pay attention to work efficiency, independent personality, cheerful personality, decisive and assertive, strong sense of time.

As an interviewer evaluating a candidate, you must first affirm the strengths of others and then point out their shortcomings.

Interview evaluation comments:

1. Grooming and appearance: neat and clean clothing, dignified appearance and temperament, and the image meets the requirements of the boring post.

2. Speech and behavior: clear language expression, certain logical thinking ability and communication ability, and extroverted personality.

3. Job matching: non-professional graduate (bachelor of business administration), more than 3 years of work experience in this position, and certain management experience.

4. Stability: more than 3 years of work experience in the industry, the number of job hopping is less than 3 times, which is relatively stable; Have a firm willingness to apply for jobs, and are willing to accept and agree with the company's management system and corporate values.

5. Professional skills test: production of PPT courseware for employee execution, with a full score of 10 points and 8 points.

6. Comprehensive evaluation: The person has a good appearance, good manners, a sense of proportion, strong language skills, a relatively outgoing personality, and good communication skills. Have three years of professional work background, and have a good professional skills test.

As a married woman with children, she is psychologically mature and has a certain ability to resist pressure. 3 years of work experience, good job matching.

You need to pay attention to writing a good interview review

1. The interview comments should focus on the basic requirements of the position.

2. The language of the interview comments should be as concise as possible, the meaning of the expression should be accurate and objective, and the candidates should not be perfunctory because they cannot see it.

3. The interview comment is an all-round evaluation of the candidate's comprehensive performance during the interview, and the advantages and disadvantages need to be objectively evaluated.

4. Clearly indicate whether to hire or not, and avoid ambiguity.

Most of the interviewers' evaluations of job seekers are from the perspective of Shi Zheng's profession, such as his major, his graduation certificate, graduation college accompaniment, personal language skills, image and cognitive requirements for the position, etc.

I think it's all about quality, education, ability, spirit, politeness and character.

It can be considered from the aspect of work trouble, from the aspect of efficiency, from the aspect of salary, from the aspect of attitude, from the aspect of performance, and from the aspect of interpersonal communication.

The interviewer should evaluate the job seeker from the aspects of his image, temperament, work ability, and personality. There is also a big evaluation of the cost performance, rolling talk.

First, he stated that his dream is to become a civil servant, so he cherished this interview opportunity and made a lot of efforts to achieve it. Although I was unable to fully show my strengths in the limited time, I tried my best.

Second, objectively evaluate the highlights and shortcomings of your interview today, confidently say what you have done well, and don't have to be discouraged about the unsatisfactory places, the key is to sum up your experience and make improvements.

Thirdly, I would like to thank this interview for giving me valuable exercise and the opportunity to showcase, and no matter what the result is, I will continue to work hard and continue to improve.

Seek truth from facts: When the interviewer asks you how to evaluate yourself, you should not only present your advantages in front of the other party, but also not overly praise yourself, causing the other party your exaggeration, not in line with reality, and even a sense of imagination, appropriate self-affirmation is necessary, but also to face the facts, excessive praise of yourself will make the other party disgusted, and it is counterproductive.

Summary. Hello dear, I'm honored to answer for you <>

How to evaluate the interviewer's interview: Start by evaluating your own performance. You can do this:

Today I gave my interview a score of 80. If the interviewer doesn't answer, you can immediately say, "The 20 points lost are, the first 10 points are what and the second 10 points are."

You take the opportunity to express what you want to supplement, and this is the wisdom of filling in the gaps. Or: "I'm generally satisfied, and there are two things I'm not satisfied with."

In this case, the interviewer will usually ask you if you are not satisfied with the two points, so that you can change from passive to proactive and immediately turn the topic to express your performance and strengths. Filling in the gaps is actually making up for the best, which is a manifestation of wisdom.

How to evaluate an interviewer's interview.

Hello dear, I'm honored to answer the omen for you. <>

How to evaluate the interviewer's interview: Start by evaluating your own performance. You can do this:

Today I gave my interview a score of 80. If the interviewer doesn't answer, you can immediately say, "The 20 points that lost the smile are what the first 10 points are, and the second 10 points are what is what."

You take the opportunity to express what you want to supplement, and this is the wisdom of filling in the gaps. Or: "I'm generally satisfied, and there are two things I'm not satisfied with."

In this case, the interviewer will usually ask which or two things you are not satisfied with, so that you can change from passive to proactive, and immediately turn the conversation to express your performance and strengths. Filling in the gaps is actually making up for the best, which is a manifestation of wisdom.

We hope you will find the following related developments: An interviewer is a professional who has a certain ability to recognize people, and can effectively select talents who are suitable for the company's requirements according to the company's strategy, product characteristics, business development and talent market supply. Interviewers are divided into professional interviewers and business-oriented interviewers.

The interviewer should be aware of the relevant interview process, know the relevant interview techniques, and be aware of the mistakes that may be made during the interview, as well as some key points. Basic qualities: Many people will think that interviewing and recruiting are not very much like HR jobs.

Because most HR work will emphasize professionalism, such as performance appraisal, cadre management, compensation and benefits, they emphasize rules and systems, which seems to be more irreplaceable. Actually, there are a lot of limb searches for recruitment, but the difference is that interviews are all about people. From this point of view, there are many characteristics of the interviewer that are irreplaceable, especially for those who have been engaged in this position for a long time, there are some special sedan requirements.

Still have questions? Kiss, can you talk about it specifically? Or is there anything you'd like to talk about? <>

Evaluate a person's merits (1):1. Helpful, good at unity, hard-working, approachable.

2. There is a way to learn, learning new things is efficient, and learning new skills is fast.

3. Have perseverance and perseverance in doing things, and have your own opinions in doing things, rather than others.

4. Kind-hearted, honest, single-minded, shrewd and capable, stable personality, enterprising and proactive.

5. Caring for others, enterprising hall refers to the initiative and independent work ability, and have good communication skills, willing to work under pressure, and have leadership qualities.

6. Respect teachers, unite classmates, be helpful, be a good helper of teachers, good friends of classmates, study diligently, enterprising, like to discuss and solve problems with classmates, and enterprisingly participate in various out-of-class and extracurricular activities organized by the class and school.

Evaluate a person's merits (2):1. Able to work independently, mature in thinking, and strong in adaptability.

2. Elegant manners and good personal character.

3. Cheerful and mature.

4. Be willing to learn and forge ahead.

5. Be able to work well in the context of Zheng Hua and the staff.

6. Be able to work well with others.

7. Energetic and trendy in thought.

Evaluate a person's merits (3):1. Mature thinking, shrewd and capable, honest.

2. Candidates who are quick to respond and enterprising.

3. Stable personality and high sense of responsibility.

4. The work is very organized and efficient.

5. Enterprising, proactive, strong independent work ability, and good communication skills.

I'll give you a rough outline:

1. Oral expression of job seekers in interviews;

2. Evaluation of job seekers' professional experience;

3. Opinions and suggestions: including suggestions for employment or suggestions for hiring after skill assessment.

The suggestions can be divided into more detailed, and there is a professional **, but you can say a few items for your reference.

1. Appearance. 2. Communication skills.

3. Learning experience.

4. Work experience.

5. Teamwork spirit.

6. Recognition of the enterprise.

According to the above items to make a weight, such an evaluation is more professional.

Depending on the level of people, objectivity and fairness should be the minimum.

In fact, in the interview, there is a very important question, that is, the evaluation of the interviewer, which is directly to the interviewer, the quality of the evaluation can make the interviewer have a different impression of you, and these impressions are the criteria for whether the interviewer hires you, so how to deal with this problem?

If the interviewer is evaluated during the interview, this requires us to be serious when the interviewer asks questions, and through the interviewer's questions, we go to the jujube chain to understand the interviewer's personality, and say their own evaluation of the interviewer, not that we must say it in a good way, everyone likes to listen to it, but blindly saying that it is good often makes people feel that there is a suspicion of flattery, so the credibility will naturally be greatly reduced, which is very unfavorable for the interviewer.

Of course, you can't say all the good things to the interviewer, and you can't say some bad things to the interviewer, although saying bad things may make the interviewer feel that you are more sincere, but if you say something bad, everyone will feel a little uncomfortable in their hearts, so it is also very unfavorable for your interview, and your arrogant comments may make the interviewer feel that you are a little arrogant, or arrogant, and see other people's shortcomings, such a person is definitely not the person the company wants, even if it is a person stool liquid Sun Cai, It will also make the interviewer feel unpleasant.

So what should the interviewer say when faced with how to evaluate it? This question, let's talk about some of the interviewer's advantages, not too much, generally four is fine, and then talk about a disadvantage, of course, this shortcoming should be very small, don't let others think that you are finding faults, or say that this one shortcoming makes others feel faceless, innocuous shortcomings, will make the interviewer feel comfortable, and will not affect your interview results, which will inevitably make the interviewer satisfied.

In this regard, just say some good things, and don't completely flatter Liu Xu.