Is it considered killing for a monk to eat rice with rice elephant eggs?

It's killing. Raw, but this belongs to the unremembered. Kill. Bear.

From killing. From the perspective of life, see if there is a killing. Raw on purpose? If there is no killing. Intentional, severe. The intention of life, we follow the precepts. Judging from this perspective, this does not constitute killing. Bear. Crime.

You said that when you step on an ant, most people don't realize if they have stepped on it when they walk, right? But it doesn't mean that he didn't step on it, this is where his mind has no memory - walking without remembering the mind, and breaking the mind without remembering. life, so there is no strong good and evil here.

Karma, good and evil that can lead to suffering and happiness after birth. karma, that is to say, not to lead to unripe fruits.

Dervishes beggars, don't cook, don't eat raw rice.

Of course, it can be counted, and every grain of rice is originally a seed, and if it is shelled, then made into rice, and eaten, doesn't that also kill a lot of rice in the future, and plant life is also life, so strictly speaking, it must be considered killing. For example, in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, there was a drinking mantra in the "Peni Daily Record".

The Buddha views a bowl of water, 84,000 insects, if you don't recite this mantra, it is like eating the flesh of living beings.

So, Buddhism has a solution for this.

Laugh. In fact, I have been thinking about this question for a long time, because compared to animals, plants that cannot express their emotions are more pitiful, and of course they cannot be harmed

However, you should understand that the Buddha's advocacy of vegetarianism is not to make animals and plants unequal, but the most important thing is to cultivate people's "religious sense" in some way, that is, not to kill

Since most people in the world understand the scope, plants and animals are of course unequal Plants are stagnant waters, and only animals similar to humans themselves have life spirituality (although I do not approve of it), so Buddhism uses this universality to teach people to be good, and the essential purpose is to persuade most people to develop "compassion", "compassion", and respect for the most fundamental aspects of life

Once a person has developed these good qualities, not committing evil or killing, and having compassion from the bottom of his heart, then, according to the Buddhist viewpoint, he can also pass away after death

Everything has a process, and sentient beings are divided into sentient beings and ruthless sentient beings, of course, this is also said in a narrow sense. Killing refers to sentient beings, i.e., animals and other beings that have thoughts and can move. Killing plants doesn't count.

Of course, in the end, you can reach the state of not eating. Of course, after not wanting this mentally handicapped body that lives by eating.

Because no sentient being treats plants as their own bodies and does not have a strong attachment to them, they can be eaten, but as the senior brother said above, there are still many lives that depend on plants for their lives. Therefore, when using it, it should also be used with compassion and not wasted at will.

The root of abstaining from killing is to cultivate compassion in all of us. There are so many lives that we inadvertently harm, so when we are aware of it, try to be compassionate and not hurt sentient beings at will.

Plants are living beings, but they are not sentient beings.

Moreover, in the monk's precepts, plants cannot be cut down casually. Because there are many sentient beings who call trees home.

There is a story about a monk who was reborn as a dragon king because he cut down trees at will, and he had a tree on his head. As soon as the wind blew, the trees moved, and the headache was terrible. This is the result of cutting down trees at will.

The monk's understanding and recognition of life is different from ours!

Is a plant a sentient being of the six realms, and will it retribution? Does eating it have karma. Figure this out and you'll be solved, otherwise you won't eat anything.

The reason why we find that plants also have a mood is because there are spirits attached to them, generally speaking, there are spirits attached to them more than 1 meter, and we only eat the fruits of plants above 1 meter, which does not harm him. Unless you get rid of the root and kill him, he will have resentment.

Since it is a religion, do not use scientific evidence to prove it. Don't say anything science has proven at every turn. The science of religion is fundamentally a different system, and religion does not need science to judge its right or wrong. Science is not omnipotent, and it is impossible to explain everything.

If you want to say that, that monk is really great, and he eats and burns karma every day, and he wants to pass on Buddhism to the next generation, which is simply immeasurable, Amitabha Buddha (You tell me the scientist who proved that Maizi also knows to be afraid, and tell me how he experimented, ok?) ）

True monks only eat their own withered leaves, or plants.

Buddhism is a system of ways to see the world, and you should focus on the main ideas it promotes, and not limit yourself to the tip of the horns, so that you will not learn anything.

Focusing on what to eat or what not to eat is really trapping yourself in a dead end.

Plants are ruthless and are not among the six realms of reincarnation, so they can be eaten.

Plants are unconscious, do not dodge, and can only be slaughtered.

Then you can create a religion that does not eat, you consider yourself the leader, and you take the lead in not eating, isn't it okay?

You guy really have bad intentions.

reasoning about you.

I reversed it

If you're not a vegetarian.

Isn't it possible to devour the father and eat the son!!

Don't say me. There is no conscience!!

In fact, this question of the landlord has also bothered me for many years, but I have never wanted to ask, because religious problems are often unsolvable.

What do monks eat if they don't eat? How do you pick the bones in the egg.

Don't monks eat stones?

If you don't eat anything, will you starve to death?

If it is true, there is no one who does not kill. Walking kills a lot of microorganisms. Bathing, drying quilts can also kill a lot. Such as mites. ......

Just do your own thing, do more good deeds, as long as you stay away from greed and hatred, all cause and effect are good.

Thou bhikkhus! After I am destroyed, I should respect and cherish the Parati Wooden Fork, such as the Ming Dynasty, and the poor should know that this is your master, if I live in the world, it is no different from this, [those who hold pure precepts shall not sell **, settle in farms], raise people and live in slavery, [all planting and treasures, should be kept away], such as avoiding fire pits. [Do not cut down grass and trees, reclaim soil and dig the ground].

Harmony decoction, auspicious and evil, looking up at the stars, pushing the steps of the surplus and void, calculating the calendar, are all undesirable, eating at the time of the body, pure and self-living, [not to participate in the world, to the mission], spells and elixirs, to marry nobles, to be kind and slow, should not be done. When self-centeredness, mindfulness and degree, do not hide flaws, show strangeness and confuse the public, in the four offerings, know the amount of contentment, interesting offerings, should not be hoarded.

This is a brief mention of the "appearance of holding the precepts", and the precepts are the foundation of righteousness and liberation, so it is called the Boroti wooden fork. Because of this vow, one will be born with the wisdom of meditation and the elimination of suffering. Therefore, bhikshus, let them keep the pure vows and do not let them be destroyed.

If you can keep the pure vows, then you can have good dharma. Without purification, all good deeds will not be born. It is to know when you know, and the precept is the first place to hide the merits.

There is also [Buddha said that the cultivator is slack], which is a criticism of the monks and cultivators, who are not allowed to farm and trade, let alone put pesticides? Funny, like Huineng, it's not allowed to make food by yourself, it's all dust, it's greed.

Those who use rice to plant medicine have cause and effect, and the rest of the people do not break their vows.

It is not a precept to sell rice, it is not a precept to eat rice, it is not a precept to apply medicine, and it is not a precept to eat it by those who grow it

The precepts are to provide a guarantee for the practitioner to practice, just as the rules and regulations of the school are to provide students with a good learning environment and atmosphere. Although there is a restraining effect, the fundamental purpose is to provide security to students, not to restrict for the sake of limiting. The same is true of the purpose of the precepts.

For ordinary believers, if they have not entered the stage of cultivation at all, they have not taken the vows, and if they have not taken the vows, there is no saying that they have broken the vows. Just like a person who doesn't go to school, even if he gets up at 9 o'clock, he doesn't have the problem of being late for class. Therefore, it is a matter of cause and effect for a person who grows crops to kill living beings by taking medicine, because he has not taken the vows himself, so there is no question of whether he has broken the vows or not.

In the same way, those who plant and sell others to eat learn Buddhism are just ordinary beliefs, and if they do not take the vows, there is no such thing as breaking the vows.

Of course, no, killing means killing things that have life, thoughts, and feelings. Although vegetables have life, they have no thoughts and perceptions, so eating vegetables is not killing.

This statement is a concept formed in ancient technology. The latter discovered that plants have life. This shows that the concept of vegetarian and meat is the same.

Otherwise, there is no need to say that the gods don't eat or drink. Monks, like ordinary people, are also ordinary people. Personally, I don't believe in gods and Buddhas, and I should eat and drink.

Nor do they despise believers. Personally, I feel that the gods and Buddhas are just a legend in the early days, and then it slowly became someone to believe in him. Agree with the current star-chasers.

What do you think?

The monk's concept of meat and vegetarian is a little different from ours, they count green onions as meat, eggs as vegetarian, and oil as vegetarian, isn't it strange.

To kill means to kill an animal. Vegetables are plants and do not count.

What monks eat is not just what we usually call meat and vegetables.

Legend has it that the vegetarian dishes in the meat dishes can be eaten.

But meat dishes in vegetarian dishes should not be eaten.

For example, garlic.

Calculate! Isn't there a saying that everything in the world has life?

Didn't the monks, they say they don't kill?!But if they don't eat they will.

Strictly speaking, it should be counted, but it's better to be a vegetarian than meat, and you can't let him starve to death.

Eating vegetables? Vegetable or meat dish? If you are a vegetarian, of course, it is not killing.

Count, but they will kill if they don't eat!! suicide".

So how do you calculate it? Why don't you let them drink the northwest wind?

It is considered killing, because we all know that eggs can give birth to chickens, although some eggs cannot give birth to chickens, but we cannot be sure whether this egg can give birth or not. Therefore, eggs are not eaten in the temple.

Master Pure Space answers: Is it the sin of the three purified meats, or is it the sin of eating eggs?

Question: Is it a big sin to eat three clean meats, or is it a big sin to eat eggs?

A: It's all the same. However, eggs in China are not very safe, and eggs bought in foreign markets are lifeless and will not hatch chicks, so now foreign eggs can be eaten.

Foreign eggs, you have to be able to buy eggs that hatch chicks, and you don't know how to buy them, I heard that the price of this kind of eggs is many times higher than that of ordinary eggs, and the eggs you buy can't hatch chicks, so the egg is lifeless, and we have to distinguish between them. There may not be such facilities in China, and the chickens in rural China are kept outside, they all mate, and the eggs have life, so this should not be eaten. The three pure meat is a last resort, not Buddhism where you eat meat and allow you to eat meat, this is a last resort, and this truth must be understood.

I don't think so, because the egg hasn't developed into a chick and feels and resents.