Intel R Pentium R Processor T4200 vs Intel Core T6400

There is not much difference between the two. The more cost-effective one should be the T4200

The price difference between the two CPUs is around 200.

Hello! t4200：

Screen: inches.

Resolution: 1280x800

CPU frequency: 2GHz

Number of cores: No data yet.

Graphics card type: Integrated graphics card.

Video memory capacity: The shared memory capacity.

Battery type: 6-cell lithium battery.

t6400：

Applicable type: notebook.

CPU series: Core 2 dual-core mobile version.

CPU frequency: 2GHz

Maximum Turbo Frequency: No data yet.

Slot type: PGA 478

Number of pins: 478pin

Number of cores: Dual cores.

Number of threads: Double-threaded.

Hehe, for your situation, it is enough to buy Y450-TFO. Moreover, T4200 is also very good and its cost performance is very high,After all, it is a new generation of processors with a new architecture,Compared with the latter, it is less than the second level cache,The main frequency is the same,But the overall performance is not much different,Spend 400 more to buy Y450-TSI is not cost-effective。。。

1) The main difference is in the L2 cache, the L2 cache of the T6500 is twice as large.

2) Its relationship, just like the Pentium and Celeron, the T4200 is a scaled-down version of the T6500.

3) Although the architecture is the same, the main frequency is the same. But with twice as much L2 cache, performance is compromised!

4) I personally recommend that you still use the Besturn dual-core T4200 and use the 400 yuan price difference to upgrade the memory and graphics card.

5) Computers are eliminated too quickly. It's good to be enough, there's no need to match it with such a high-end one.

Pentium dual-core. t4200

a) Main frequency. b) L2 cache: 1m

c) Core type.

penryn

Core dual-core. t6500

a) Main frequency. b) L2 cache: 2MB

c) Core type.

penryn

Don't worry, I'm using the T4200. Overall, it's not bad, in fact, the T4200 is only 1M less L2 cache than the T6500, and the rest.

The process is the same, and in general, the performance is not bad and enough.

Intel processors can be divided into four major series from low to high: Celeron Dual-Core, Pentium Dual-Core, Core 2-Core (T-series), Core 2-Core (P-series), and in terms of series, Pentium Dual-Core is a notch lower than the Core T-series. So is the difference in performance huge?

T4200 as far as I know.

It can almost be regarded as the best of the Pentium dual-core. It is also the only one in the Pentium dual-core that uses 45nm technology, and others such as the Pentium dual-core T3400 are all 65nm. And the Core dual-core T series is all 45nm technology.

In this respect, the T4200 is the same as the T6600. And their architecture is all penryn, which is also consistent.

Since they share the same core architecture: the Core microarchitecture, their performance is primarily determined by the core frequency, followed by the L2 cache and front-side bus.

Now the comparison is clear.

Core frequency: t4200:

And T6600:

L2 cache: T4200: 1MB, while T6600: 2MB

FSB: T4200: 800MHz

T6600 is also 800, which is the same for both (T4200 is the only one in the Pentium dual-core with a front-side bus of 800, and other Pentium dual-cores such as T3400 are 667 or lower).

From the above, it can be seen that the T6600 mainly has advantages over the T4200 in core frequency and L2 cache, but the performance gap caused by this advantage is not huge.

According to relevant tests, the comprehensive performance of T6600 is about 10% higher than that of T4200, which is not very large.

I don't know what you're going to do with the computer, if it's a game, the performance of the T4200 won't be very bad, because the current CPU development is already very advanced, and the bottleneck of the performance of the notebook is that the performance of the graphics card can't keep up, so the key is to match the CPU with the graphics card well.

If you use T4200 with 8600M

gt。。With T6600 with 9300M

GS graphics card. I guarantee that the T4200 performs better than the T6600 in the game.

Hey, not much more, to be honest-

Typing is tiring, and 5 points is too little. Hey.

It can't be better than the T2370.

Atom is only a netbook low-power CPU

Positioning is different.