Many articles on the Internet say that e commerce destroys the entity, is this really the case?

Two people with similar physiques in the same environment, people who are used to sleeping in clothes often feel cold, but those who sleep naked will feel warmer. Is it warmer to sleep naked than to sleep with clothes on? Is this a human delusion or a fact?

When you sleep with your clothes on, the temperature in the quilt will be basically stable, while when you sleep naked, the temperature in the quilt will naturally rise within about 15 minutes.

It turns out that the quilt has the property of "moist heat", which can absorb the moisture in the quilt and the heat emitted by the human body. When a person sleeps naked, the heat with body temperature is absorbed by the quilt, so the temperature in the quilt naturally rises.

Some people are afraid of the cold when they sleep and always wear thick clothes to sleep. As everyone knows, the heat of the human body will be absorbed by the clothes, and the clothes themselves do not have the effect of emitting "moist heat", so the bed is always cold when dressing and sleeping. In addition, the pressure and friction of clothes on the muscles may also affect the body's blood circulation, which will also reduce the amount of heat emitted, so even if you cover it with a thick quilt, you can't resist the chill.

It can be seen that it may be better for people who are afraid of cold to sleep naked.

ps: If you want to have a warm quilt, in addition to covering a thick quilt, you must also dare to sleep naked, then you will find that sleeping naked is actually warmer than sleeping with clothes on.

There are many people who say that it is e-commerce that has shrunk the real economy, and the idleness of many shops has laid off many people engaged in the real economy. Only e-commerce is dominant, so it is necessary to develop the real economy and curb e-commerce.

In the situation of overwhelming stores, has the real economy shrunk?

In a business district, only 30% of the expanding shop clusters are profitable. The remaining 30% can only protect the principal, and the rest must be loss-making. Therefore, in a business district, the rent or selling price of shops of the same area is different due to different locations.

Many consumers will also find that many shops are constantly changing owners.

Some shops are not profitable, why do some people take over? The reasons for the emergence of this phenomenon of violating the laws of economics are unknown. Let me explain it simply, there is a steady stream of people who don't understand business.

This can also create a false boom in the real economy, with many shops that are not profitable, and are resurrected by the continuous renewal of leases by new merchants. In the end, whose interests are not lost? There are only shops and departments that charge various fees.

The boom of e-commerce has completely squeezed out these bubbles.

Some merchants can invest much less in e-commerce than physical stores to test the car, so some physical stores have no blood and are completely abandoned.

How can this be said that e-commerce has ruined the real economy? E-commerce has ruined the store. Even if it seems that employment is the same as unemployment, many people have lost their savings in the practice of the real economy.

Therefore, we do not practice through subjective assumptions, and can only talk nonsense.

E-commerce is unlikely to have an impact on employment, and e-commerce has made some people completely give up the idea of indiscriminately investing in stupid codes, but in fact, it protects the interests of some people; Of course, it also harms the interests of others, such as shops.

On the surface yes, in reality it is not. The model of e-commerce is essentially service and more experiential than the brick-and-mortar model.

Returns: Simply speaking of the physical store, I just bought a product, and when I look back, I find that I don't want it anymore, and I want to return it, and the physical store will not refund it.

Strong selling: There is also a kind of face-to-face pit that you have not negotiated, such as hard to add two catties to let you buy more, and fakes, which are short of catties and two. Anyway, I don't like brick-and-mortar stores.

Summary: However, if the new retail is up, the physical store will be better, and if the above things are solved, it will naturally surpass e-commerce.

The economy has been hurt by e-commerce, and they are talking nonsense with their eyes open.

With the advent of the Internet era, the popularity of e-commerce has exceeded people's imagination, covering people's clothing, food, housing and transportation in a short period of time, completely changing people's lifestyles. In the past, when everyone was hungry, the first thing they thought of was the small restaurants and supermarkets downstairs, but now when they are hungry, the first thing that comes to mind is Meituan and Ele.me。The first thing that comes to mind when you go out to take a taxi is online car-hailing, and when you go shopping, you think of JD.com, **.

The payment method has also been changed from cash to electronic payment.

Just when the real economy is scattered by the impact of e-commerce, the rent is in the first place, and the opening of physical stores must consider the first amount and traffic conditions, so they often choose in the bustling city center, or places with many residential communities, and the housing prices in these areas are higher, and with the progress of the times, college students after graduation, the salary requirements are relatively highwill not endure hardships for a salary of two or three thousand. Low-wage recruitment is no longer realistic, and the increase in operating costs is the second reason for the decline of the real economy.

In view of these two points, physical stores need to establish their own brands, launch distinctive products, attract the attention of consumers, find unique and innovative ways that suit them, and increase their irreplaceability in order to win customers.

I think there should be a certain destructive effect, because the real economy is also a part of the national economy, and if the real economy is destroyed, the national economy will definitely be affected.

Physical commerce will face impacts, but if you put these reasons on the head of e-commerce, it will be a bit too much.

I don't think so, it's just the emergence of a new industry that has brought a new impact.

It should have a certain impact, but it is mainly because e-commerce is more popular.

I don't think it's possible that this approach will also bring new signs to the national economy.

This should not be devastating, after all, this form is needed by the times.

I think this is a view, but in fact, e-commerce is more of a social progress.

I think this should have a certain impact. In the end, it depends on who is good, which is the most popular, or whatever.

How to say this, it depends on who is more popular, and who chooses.

It is impossible for entities to subvert e-commerce. It is also impossible for e-commerce to subvert the entity.

1) First of all, physical and e-commerce are mixed and mutually supportive, so interoperability is king, just like the new retail proposed by Jack Ma in 2016;

2) Thirdly, the concept of physical and e-commerce has been blurred and cannot be clearly demarcated, such as eating in a physical store and using mobile payment, what is it? Or order a good meal through the ordering platform, what is it to eat in the store? I think O2O also belongs to the concept of e-commerce in a broad sense.

For example, whether it is **, Jingdong, or Tmall, (except for mobile phone recharge, game point cards, etc.) is actually physical production, and then sold online, what is the offline production part? From the perspective of the entire ** chain or consumption chain, it is integrated with each other; I agree with Jack Ma that e-commerce in the narrow sense will no longer exist; Mobile devices, e-commerce shopping, mobile payment, I think it is a kind of Internet and the tools brought to us by the mobile Internet, whether it is an entity or wants to conduct business online, it is just the result of comprehensive comparison and decision-making of enterprises according to their own genes, advantages, costs, etc.

3) Finally, once again, I think the world is not a binary opposite, but interrelated, mutually supportive, and mutually integrated, for example, a few years ago, Gree Dong Mingzhu bet, Tmall search is not Gree***.

4) In essence, whether it is e-commerce or physical stores, it is a consumption channel and a way of life, these two in different fields, different industries, have different advantages and disadvantages, can not be opposed, let alone who replaces whom, integration is the king, mutual reform and optimization is the way out.

First of all, physical and e-commerce are mixed and mutually supportive, so interoperability is king, just like the new retail proposed by Jack Ma in 2016;