Is it true that the reform of teacher titles will be reformed, and will the teacher titles be reform

Yes, now you can prepare for the exam, Nanhua Education has special teacher training, New Oriental or something, or read books by yourself, nothing more than pedagogy, psychology and professional knowledge + Mandarin.

Teacher titles will be reformed.

In recent years, many regions have taken the lead in setting up pilot reforms for professional title evaluation. Many people don't know about the pilot implementation of the title reform, and even if they have heard of it, they actually have less perception and have not felt obvious changes. Industry experts pointed out that there is a long process to go in the implementation of the reform of professional title evaluation.

At the national level, there will no longer be a unified adjustment of the proportion of high, middle and primary post structure, and the provincial and town-level departments and educational administrative departments will be authorized to scientifically set up the post structure of teachers, and each province can calculate and allocate the post rank of management teachers in counties. This means that each region can independently construct the structure of teacher posts according to the actual situation, and the proportion of middle and senior professional titles in areas with a weak educational foundation will also be further improved.

At the beginning of the new semester, a reform news related to 12.7 million primary and secondary school teachers came: the executive meeting decided to comprehensively promote the reform of the primary and secondary school teacher title system, and there were new regulations for title promotion, evaluation standards, and evaluation process. Behind the comprehensive promotion of the reform of the professional title system is the appeal and expectation of grassroots teachers and the Sun family, a model book in the industry, for many years.

The evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers' titles should be based on teaching and scientific research ability, and the evaluation of professional titles should be inclined to the front line of teaching, and professional ability should be used as the evaluation standard. The distribution of professional titles should be appropriately tilted towards the rural areas, and efforts should be made to increase the proportion of middle and senior teachers in rural schools so that they are not lower than those in local urban schools.

<> national level, there will no longer be a unified adjustment of the proportion of high, middle and junior post structure, and provincial-level departments and educational administrative departments will be authorized to scientifically set up the post structure of teachers, and each province can calculate and assign the post rank of management teachers in counties.

This new regulation means that each region can independently set up the structure of teacher posts according to the actual situation, which also means that the proportion of middle and senior professional titles in areas with a weak educational foundation will also be further increased.

At the same time, the Ministry of Education also proposed that the evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers' titles should be based on teaching and scientific research ability, and the evaluation of professional titles should be inclined to the front line of teaching, and professional ability should be used as the evaluation standard. The distribution of professional titles should be appropriately tilted in favor of rural areas, and efforts should be made to increase the proportion of middle and senior teachers in rural schools so that they are not lower than those in local urban schools.

Yes. The revised Teachers Law has allowed us to see that the threshold for teachers has been raised, and the requirements for academic qualifications and majors have become more stringent. It is more difficult for junior college students or non-normal students to compete for the position of teacher in the future.

Especially for those who want to become kindergarten teachers, a minimum of a bachelor's degree may be required.

Teachers who want to be awarded professional titles need to meet the standards of the Ministry of Education, as well as the standards set by the school. Some schools set up relatively strict assessments, resulting in many excellent front-line teachers who have not been rated for many years. As a result, many teachers have lost their love for the three-foot podium.

In order to allow these teachers to face a fairer opportunity to compete when evaluating their professional titles, many departments have issued relevant notices, so that many excellent teachers can see the hope of being rated with senior professional titles.

1. Establish a wage distribution system and a promotion and capital increase mechanism for more work and more pay.

2. The evaluation of teachers' titles should be combined with the position setting.

From the above two aspects, it can be seen that there will definitely be a major reform of teacher titles, because the current titles do not meet the above regulations.

First, the current job titles simply cannot reflect the wage distribution system of more work and more pay.

At present, the treatment of teachers is not based on who has a large workload, but on whose professional title is high. However, teachers with high professional titles may not attend classes, may be on vacation, and may be in some more leisurely positions, but they can still enjoy the highest salary. Therefore, there is no such thing as more work and more in school, at least the title cannot reflect more work and more reward.

Meritocracy means that you should enjoy the best treatment if you do well, but your current job title obviously can't do it. Looking at the schools, many teachers with strong teaching ability and good teaching performance are still not rated as senior titles, and some teachers who are not good at teaching, or even do not attend classes, are rated as senior early.

If the job title can be improved in these two aspects, it is definitely the best reform.

Second: the current professional title cannot reflect the needs of teachers to increase capital and promotion, and many teachers have worked hard all their lives to be junior titles.

Why is the profession of a teacher unattractive? Especially not to attract male teachers? The main reason is not actually low salary, but hopeless promotion and no future.

Because the treatment of teachers is to look at the professional title, and the professional title has index restrictions, many teachers are destined to be unrated, and if they can't be evaluated, they are destined to be only low-cost for a lifetime. Some teachers are even retiring and still have junior titles, so how can such a title system attract men?

If the new "Teacher Law" can set up a set of scientific salary mechanism for teachers to be promoted and increase their capital, it will definitely be the greatest benefit to teachers. However, if you want to set up a reasonable promotion and capital increase mechanism, there is no better way to reform the title. Therefore, the reform of professional titles is definitely hopeful.

Third: there are also many unreasonable phenomena in the current job title evaluation and post setting.

At present, the evaluation and appointment of professional titles are separated, and it is the school that evaluates the professional title, but the personnel bureaus of various localities are hired. Many teachers in the school have not been hired for many years, resulting in poor salaries.

In addition, the evaluation and position setting of professional titles are also unreasonable, and the current school administrative leaders are competing for professional titles with front-line teachers, which is unreasonable in itself, resulting in greater difficulty in evaluating the professional titles of front-line teachers. Looking at the schools, although the principal and vice principal have not been in class for a long time, they have basically been rated as senior titles early, but what about the front-line teachers? Although he has been taking classes on the front line all year round, he still can't get a job title.

The above is all the answer to whether the teacher's title will be reformed.

The evaluation of teachers' professional titles is directly related to the teacher's highest academic qualifications, and it is necessary to do a good job in adequate assessment according to the relevant teaching qualifications, ideological and moral standards, and Marxist ideological cognition and other inspection standards.

In the face of this incident of teachers' "professional titles", the document issued by the Education Bureau has reduced the requirements of the indicators, so as to quickly attract talents and revitalize the cause of education. The evaluation of teachers' "professional titles" has ushered in changes, the threshold has been reduced, the number of places has increased, the policy has been relaxed, and the benefits are full.

What are the criteria for teacher evaluation?

When it comes to the criteria for teacher evaluation, not only must they be specified within the school, but even the Education Bureau has a series of standards of conduct, which is a pity for the teachers who are selected, and the mental and physical pressure forces the teachers to change careers. Under the vigorous advocacy of the first Wang bend, the economically developed coastal areas are divided into corresponding calls, the most prominent is Guangxi, Guangdong, Shandong three provinces, not only do not stipulate some complex and cumbersome standards, but also envy the focus on the development of schools at all levels, to the greatest extent in line with the wishes of teachers, this humanized assessment standards, relieve the pressure of teachers, teaching can also be effectively improved.

In 2022, the teacher title ushered in a "major reform", or the index requirements will be reduced, and teachers cheered.

The Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Education first proposed in the "Measures for the Selection and Review of Teacher Titles (Draft for Public Comment)" that qualified schools can be based on the standard after approval.