A female college student was denied boarding due to depression, how did the airline involved respond

The airline responded by sayingBecause the passenger was very emotional at the time and could not judge the patient's condition, this decision was made with great caution for the safety of the patient and the passengers on the plane without the advice of a medical professional。After this incident was **, it caused a lot of discussion among netizens, and everyone expressed their opinions on the Internet. Some believe that the airline discriminates against people with depression, while others believe that the airline has no problem considering this practice for the safety of patients and other passengers.

For both statements, I myself prefer the latter. The Air Transport Act also clearly states that airlines have the right to refuse to carry patients suffering from mental illness and infectious diseases, which may threaten the safety of other passengers and the patient's own safety cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the airline also has very good reasons for refusing to carry the female college student, after all, they really can't determine whether the female college student can control her emotions on the plane.

This is also for the sake of other passengers, if the female college student really behaves more radically after the plane takes off, then it is very likely to hurt other passengers. You must know that the plane was in the process of flying at that time, and it may be that a small movement will cause the entire number of people on the plane to be in danger. The second is that the female college student was originally suffering from depression, so the airline could not guarantee her own life.

When the plane is flying, there is no first aid on the plane, and it is irresponsible for the patient at that time.

However, if the airlines could have changed their approach, the matter might not have been so troublesome. If they can speak in a more tactful way and pay more attention to the privacy of passengers, then this female college student will not be emotional, so I hope that they must pay attention to how they deal with patients with depression or other mental illnesses in the future.

The airline involved responded that it was very regrettable to make this decision for the sake of the passenger's own health and the safety of other passengers in the absence of a professional doctor when the passenger was agitated and there was no professional doctor.

The airline responds that patients with depression who are in stable condition can board the plane, and it is not recommended that patients take the plane during the onset of the disease, because the plane is a confined space, and there may be unpredictable conditions, affecting the safety of others' lives, and it is necessary to judge by combining various factors.

The airlines involved responded only to express regret over the incident. However, this kind of incident should not be simply stated by the airline as refusing to board on the grounds of unknown illness, because the airline knew that the female college student had a mental illness and had been told that it was a drug, so on the premise of determining **, the airline's refusal to board is only an act to reduce the company's own risk, and the party should apologize for the refusal to board.

That's right, the girl was already showing obvious symptoms at the time, and the airline was acting for the safety of the passengers.

I think it's wrong, if you have depression, you can't say that you will recover, but as long as you don't get sick, you should be like ordinary people, and it's not fair to the depressed person to not be allowed to get on the plane.

I don't think the airline is wrong, you have depression in the first place, and if you can't think about suicide on the plane, it's a dangerous thing.

I don't think the airlines are doing it properly. Depression generally does not harm other people, airlines deprive them of the right to fly, and people with depression are already vulnerable, and airlines should not discriminate against them.

According to reports, the female college student had trembling hands when she boarded the plane. For the safety of passengers on the entire plane, it is understandable that airlines would deny boarding for the safety of all passengers on board.

On the one hand, he was worried that the girl would have an accident on the plane, and it would be too late to treat her and waste her life. On the other hand, she was also worried that her depression would bring fear to the passengers on the plane.

Personally, I think it is impossible for airlines to be denied boarding because of depression, people who have been on the plane know that no one will ask you if you have any illness before boarding, so they will not know that you have depression, and the reason why the passenger was denied is because of the complaints of other passengers, after all, the illness before boarding makes other passengers who do not know the reason feel scared, so for the safety of other passengers, they refused to board the passenger.

I think this kind of behavior is completely wrong, and it is a great harm to people with depression, and people with depression deserve our understanding and respect just like other patients. Such behavior at the airport can be said to be very inhumane.

It depends on whose perspective you are looking at it, and you can understand what both sides are doing. As an airline, they also considered that the denial of boarding of the girl was also based on consideration, and the passenger was agitated and unclear at the time, and without professional medical advice, they cautiously made this regrettable decision out of consideration for the health of the passenger and the flight safety of all other passengers. As a girl, she is actually not that serious, and being denied boarding on the spot may hurt the girl's self-esteem and make her condition worse.

So the airline should apologize.

Four. In my opinion, even if we encounter this kind of thing, it is not ourselves, we have to pick up the law ** and seek justice for this female college student, how can they do this? Is it just because this female college student suffers from depression that the female college student can be treated differently?

Therefore, we must take up the law to recover the rights that should belong to this female college student, and we can't let this airline bully this female college student, only in this way can we teach this airline a lesson and let him know that he can't treat the people with diseases differently in this way.

I think the airport did the right thing because it was also for the sake of ensuring the safety of the passengers to deny boarding to the female college student, and we should see the big picture and not the small one.

I don't think airlines are doing the right thing, and there's no clear law that says you can't take people with depression.

In October 2020, the issue of "female college student denied boarding due to depression" sparked heated discussions. The client, Mr. Yu, posted that his girlfriend has been suffering from depression for several years, and after more than a year, **has been basically**, but he still needs to seek medical treatment on time once a month.

On October 13, 2020, they prepared to take a Spring Airlines flight to Nanjing for medical treatment at Weihai Airport in Shandong Province. Spring Airlines employee Liu Moumou reported to the company and the captain on the grounds that his girlfriend was mentally ill and emotional, resulting in them not being able to board the plane.

Mr. Yu said that his girlfriend was just anxious and cried, and quickly regained her composure after being interrogated, and there was no sign of depression. However, Spring Airlines said that the staff reassured the passengers many times, but the passengers' emotions still could not be calmed.

Female college students are denied boarding due to depression, this refusal is unreasonable, will cause a lot of inconvenience to this group of people, is a very disrespectful behavior for depressed patients, and even some discrimination, is very unreasonable, and does not treat every passenger fairly.

Unreasonable, depressed people are a very vulnerable group, they are a group of people who need to be protected and not refuse for any reason.

It is said that the passenger and his companion were agitated, and the passenger himself had trembling hands and shouted at the boarding gate, causing the surrounding passengers to complain to the staff, and some passengers on the same flight saw this situation and asked the staff not to be on the same plane with them. I think it's normal to refuse in this situation, if you don't make a lot of noise and communicate well, I'm sure everyone won't refuse.

I don't think it's reasonable, and the airport doesn't have such a right, and girls should enjoy the service they should have when they spend money to buy a ticket.

I don't think it's reasonable, if she doesn't have other abnormal conditions, she is no different from a normal person, she won't cause any harm, and it won't affect the flight of the plane, so she has the right to board the plane.

Although I don't want to admit this fact, butThe captain's reasons for denying the female college student boarding were reasonable

The Air Transport Act clearly stipulates that airlines may refuse to register a patient if he or she suffers from a mental illness or a contagious disease that may threaten the safety of other passengers and the patient. Although the female college student's depression has been basically **, she has a lot of abnormalities, so there is no guarantee that the college student will not cause damage to the facilities on the plane during the flight. You must know that if something really goes wrong during the flight, the lives of the passengers of the entire plane will be in danger, and the consequences can be catastrophic.

Even if you can control yourself well, if the patient has an accident on his own, there are no first responders on the plane, and the patient will not be able to get an emergency**.

So although he didn't want to admit the facts, the captain did have the right to refuse the female college student boarding. Many people may think that this is unfair to the person with depression, but the captain should pay more attention to the safety of other passengers than the patient. However, the captain seems to have some problems in the way he deals with this matter, because depression is a mental illness in the first place, and refusing to register this female college student is likely to lead to the aggravation of her condition.

And the boyfriend of the female college student also came forward to explain that the reason why the girlfriend was emotional was because the airport staff told her that she could not board the plane normally. However, the mood quickly stabilized, and the matter has now begun to go through the judicial process, and the final result still has to wait for the court's decision. It can only be said that the captain and the leadership of the airport pay attention to the safety of the passengers of the entire plane, which is correct, but I hope that they can pay more attention to mental patients, put themselves in the shoes of such patients, and use a more tactful way to deal with such things.

I think the refusal of a female college student to board a plane due to depression is very unreasonable and a form of discrimination against depressed people.

It is not reasonable to allow depression to board the aircraft as long as a specific caregiver is arranged, or to stipulate that the depressed person must be accompanied by a family member.

Reasonable, the airline is doing the right thing, not only to protect the safety of university students, but also to consider the safety of other passengers.

Irrationality. Because there is no clause that says people with depression cannot board the plane, there is no reason for the airline to refuse it.

Under normal circumstances, airlines do not have the right to refuse to carry a depressed person, but the patient exhibits a lot of abnormal behavior when flying, such as the passenger's hands shaking and shouting at the boarding gate, which indicates that the passenger is prone to mood swings.

According to Article 34 of the Rules for the Domestic Carriage of Passengers and Baggage by Civil Aviation of China, passengers with infectious diseases, mental illness or passengers whose health conditions may endanger themselves or affect the safety of other passengers shall not be allowed to carry passengers. It can be seen from this that the airline has the right to refuse to carry passengers on board.

What do you think about this? It is felt that the airline's approach is biased, because the depressed person does not show specific behaviors that affect the safe operation of the aircraft, but for the airline, just in case is the most important thing, and it is understandable that the airline refused to carry the passenger at this time.

The airline is afraid that the college student will behave unfavorably on the plane to the passengers and herself, so worry about her!

If you don't want him to do dangerous things on it, you just don't want him anymore, and it's a particularly good practice to not let him come up.

The airline's concern is that college students will get sick on the plane and do something bad for passengers.

For the sake of safety and security for all passengers, there is nothing wrong with the airline's actions. After all, not long ago, a passenger on an Air China passenger plane committed suicide. Aircraft are inherently dangerous during flight, and once an accident occurs, the consequences are unimaginable.

Maybe it's the fear that college students will act aggressively on themselves due to depression in the air, or maybe it's their contempt for depression, we don't know, after all, the misunderstanding and discrimination against depression in the whole society still exists.

After the news of "the girl was denied boarding due to depression" reappeared, it was also a question that caused a series of doubts among netizens, is there discrimination in this situation? After all, in such a situation, it is a very disrespectful behavior to give everyone, and after understanding, it is found that there are also a series of decisions made by the airline for the safety of other passengers, because this is also a public place on the plane, they not only need to consider a person but also need to consider the problem of the whole crew, the airtightness and depression on the plane make it very uncomfortable, the mood will be irritable and depressed, not to mention that depressed patients will also bring them a certain amount of trouble. <>

Netizens who understand this matter also said such a point, the complete news is that Renjia is in view of the passenger's emotional irregularity, the pathology is unknown and the comfort is fruitless, and the situation without professional medical advice refuses to board, not just because of her depression, this matter is not for depressed patients, **unknown, and the aerospace company cannot guarantee that people can get effective if they have an illness on the plane**, so they refuse to board, and the drug exists***, if she happens to have another illness during the flight? The trip of more than 200 people was delayed, so what should other passengers do? Not every person happens to meet a doctor on a plane, and it is not safe for the patient to get on the plane at that time, and it is safer to take public transportation when she is stable.

If it's understandable that you can't get on a plane because you're emotional, what if you compare your heart to what happens in the sky? <>

Isn't it also a responsible performance for them in such a situation? And in the "China Civil Aviation Passenger and Baggage Domestic Transport Rules" also has relevant regulations, for such passengers not to let them board the plane is also a safety problem, we should learn to understand, with a reasonable attitude to carry out is the best responsibility. <>