The primary school forgot to turn off the ultraviolet lamp and the whole class was illuminated for 9

Elementary school forgot to turn off the ultraviolet lamp, and the whole class was illuminated for 9 hours" This news is really heart-wrenching and worrying! So who should be responsible for this management negligence? Personally, I think that the first is that the specific supervision of the school is not in place, the second is the negligence of the substitute teacher, and the third is that other teachers did not find out in time during the period, which also carries a certain responsibility.

Why is the lack of specific supervision of the school as the most important reason? Mainly considering the identity of the teacher. Judging from the news from netizens, we know that the teacher who has not turned off the ultraviolet disinfection lamp after turning on it is a substitute teacher, who does not yet have the teaching qualifications of a formal teacher, and has no professional pre-job training in this area.

And as a school, it is impossible not to know his identity! However, knowing that he was a substitute teacher, he still did not pay attention to and remind him in this regard, which is a dereliction of duty on the part of the school. So, I think the main responsibility lies with the school.

Second, it is the negligence of the substitute teacher. As a substitute teacher, although I have not obtained the teaching qualification like other formal teachers, I still have the most basic professional qualities. Ultraviolet rays are harmful to the human body, which is the basic common sense that ordinary people know.

And as a substitute teacher, I forgot to turn off the ultraviolet disinfection lamp because of negligence, which is incomprehensible and unforgivable. Moreover, the substitute teacher is directly responsible for the accident and should bear the relevant responsibility for the incident.

Thirdly, other teachers during the class also have related responsibilities. From this information, the substitute teacher turned on the ultraviolet disinfection lamp at 7:42 in the morning and did not turn it off, until 16:45 in the afternoon before being discovered by other teachers, which lasted for 9 hours, during which no teacher even thought of turning off the ultraviolet disinfection lamp. This is very unconscionable, and it also shows that the safety awareness of these teachers is also problematic.

So if you look into it, you can't fail to add all the teachers who have come to this class during this period.

Finally, I sincerely hope that the injured children can recover their health as soon as possible and return to their favorite schools as soon as possible!

Yesterday, it was revealed that the English Experimental Primary School in Dagang, Binhai New Area, Tianjin, was irradiated by ultraviolet lamps for nine bear markets. Many children suffered severe burns to their eyes and faces, as well as their necks. The reason for this is that the staff turned on the lights in the morning to disinfect the classrooms, but forgot to turn off the lights.

This is a low-level negligence. If it is placed in the enterprise, then the person who has to work, as well as the employee's immediate supervisor and superior leaders will be punished. It is serious to fire employees, after all, the company has suffered a lot of economic losses.

Enterprises mainly look at economic losses, so what about schools, it is not a simple economic problem, but more importantly, the health and future of primary school students. Therefore, the teachers, directors and superiors of the school, and the whole school have responsibilities that cannot be shaken off. According to the current news, the lights were turned on at more than 7 o'clock in the morning, and it was not found and turned off by other teachers until more than 4 o'clock in the afternoon.

It can be seen that the school does not pay full attention to this kind of safety incident.

In addition, the burned parts are the eyes, face and neck, these are very important organs of a person, these are burned, whether it can be seen is not necessarily, if there are sequelae, then a person's future will be greatly reduced.

Moreover, behind every child is a family, and the children represent the hope of the future, so the responsibility of the school is very heavy. When this happens, the responsibility of the school is great.

FigInternet.

It is said that on the 12th, a primary school in Tianjin forgot to turn it off after turning on the ultraviolet lamp in the morning for disinfection, resulting in the whole class being photographed for nine hours.

A number of students suffered severe burns to their faces and necks, and all the injured people are currently being sent to the hospital.

First of all, the school is responsible no matter what.

As the person in charge of a school, because the teacher's negligence has such a significant consequence, the person in charge must be responsible.

At present, the most important thing is to get the child out of danger first, and as for whether to bear legal responsibility or financial compensation later, both parties need to negotiate to reach an agreement.

When it comes to the health and safety of children, it must not be easily solved, and this incident may be a difficult problem to solve.

Secondly, the teacher who forgot to close at that time should be responsible.

As a teacher in charge of disinfection, he forgot to turn off the lights after disinfection, and no one found out all day, which shows that there are indeed many problems in the work of teachers in this school.

The teacher who forgot to turn off the lights is afraid that he will face a huge amount of compensation, and I am afraid that his career will also be affected, which is not only a momentary negligence, but also a matter of life, so he may not be able to avoid this responsibility.

As for the other teachers, they must also be responsible, they failed to find out in time during class, forgot to turn off the lights and no one checked in time, and these relevant personnel should be responsible for this matter.

However, even if more people are responsible, the impact on the children has already been caused, and the school management really cannot be negligent, because no one can afford the consequences.

The elementary school forgot to turn off the ultraviolet lamp and the whole class was illuminated for 9 hours, and the management negligence of course had to be paid for by the primary school first, and then the dereliction of duty would be held responsible.

First, take the whole class to the hospital for emergency treatment (including the teacher who is being photographed, of course). Because students have been exposed for a long time, have been seriously victimized, and are young, they should be taken seriously. It is important to call on medical experts to take the necessary measures to minimize the severity of personal harm at all costs.

The most taboo is that at this moment, there are peacemakers who jump out and make nonsense, such as "ultraviolet rays have little impact on the human body", "don't make a fuss" and so on. Some sequelae will be difficult to find for a while, and the most important thing is the attitude of the school, which must draw inferences from one case and rectify it sincerely to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

Children are the flowers of the motherland and the pillars of the future, and they cannot be treated badly. Parents hand over their children to the school, the school has a heavy responsibility, and teaching and educating people is a systematic project, and there must be no sloppiness. If you are mercenary and don't take your children's lives and health seriously, you are not worthy of being a "soul engineer".

At the same time, those involved must be held accountable! Empathy, if your child is innocently exposed to ultraviolet rays for 9 hours, is it distressed? Whoever makes a mistake will be punished as he deserves, and he will make a sincere act of repentance and apologize to the students, parents, teachers, and other relevant victims.

If it is perfunctory, there is no guarantee that such an accident will not happen again. This time it's ultraviolet rays, and next time it's an even more terrible event, who can afford it? For example, school bus safety, student food hygiene quality, dormitory living environment, teaching equipment safety, etc., no matter how big or small, you must not be sloppy.

Today, I saw a news that a primary school forgot to turn off the ultraviolet lamp, the whole class was illuminated for 9 hours, and many children were burned and sent to the hospital. Such a big management oversight makes people feel angry and incredible, and I think the responsibility should be borne by the school.

First of all, as a primary school, the most important thing should be safety, now all kinds of accidents emerge in an endless stream, parents send their children to school not only to receive knowledge, learn to be a person, the most basic is to let them grow up healthily. Therefore, the school should have very comprehensive and strict management regulations, and if the above things happen, either the school does not have relevant management regulations, or the assignment tasks are vague, or the relevant responsible person is derelict in his duties. No matter which link goes wrong, the school has an unshirkable responsibility.

If there is no lack of relevant regulations, then schools should reflect on how they make management rules, and every school should have a very good management system, big and small, to ensure the health and safety of children. So the first thing to do is to check the source and see if the school's management of this initiative is in place.

If there is no problem with the school's arrangement, but the person who is specifically responsible for turning off the ultraviolet lamp except for the error, then he is the biggest responsible person, and it can be said that he is fully responsible. In the face of such a staff, the first thing is to investigate his problems, the second is to determine the children's injuries, and he is responsible for the medical expenses, etc., and finally he is to take responsibility, and he should not be hired by the school in the future.

In a primary school in Tianjin, the negligence of a substitute teacher caused the entire class of first-grade students to be exposed to ultraviolet disinfection lamps for up to nine hours. After the incident, many children experienced varying degrees of physical discomfort. The school should bear the responsibility for the serious consequences of such negligence.

Ultraviolet disinfection lamps mainly use ultraviolet rays to destroy some viruses to achieve the effect of disinfection and sterilization. It is widely used in many scenarios, such as hospitals, restaurants, pharmaceutical industries, agriculture, etc., and some families have also purchased ultraviolet disinfection lamps for home disinfection. We also see ultraviolet disinfection lamps in some public places, so ultraviolet disinfection lamps are very close to our lives.

Parents of injured children seek solutions from the school, and the school is that every child has insurance, and the medical expenses should be reimbursed by the insurance company as soon as possible. At present, from the feedback of the school, it seems that the school has not been very active in resolving the incident, and has not determined who should bear the responsibility and responsibility, let alone assisted parents to lead their children to seek medical treatment. The child's time at school takes up most of the day, and if the school is not strictly managed, it is a disaster for the child.

The school should take full responsibility, after all, the children are passively harmed, and the reason is also the negligence of the teachers. If the school's management system is intact and someone is responsible for patrolling to check whether the UV lights in each class are turned off on time, even if the teacher is negligent, there will not be such a serious incident. Therefore, at this time, the school should stand up bravely, actively cooperate with parents to solve the problem, and re-smooth the school's management process to avoid similar tragedies from happening again.

A recent campus accident has aroused great concern among parents of all parties, about the safety and security of students in the school, at 7 o'clock on November 12, a substitute teacher of a class in the first grade entered the classroom to turn on the ultraviolet lamp for disinfection, and then forgot to turn it off!! The incident happened in Dagang English Experimental Primary School in Binhai New Area, Tianjin. It wasn't until more than 16 o'clock in the afternoon that other teachers found out and turned it off.

However, such a long period of ultraviolet light exposure has caused many children to have very painful eyes, bloodshot and tearful eyes. Parents and children rushed to major hospitals for emergency treatment that night.

Originally, it was for the good of the students to turn on the ultraviolet lamp for disinfection, but because of the teacher's negligence, it led to such serious consequences, and the school was of course responsible.

At the beginning of school, students spend almost longer time in school than at home, and they spend more time with teachers than even with their parents, who put their children at school, and both the school and the teachers are people who receive state salaries, and of course they are responsible for the safety of their students.

If the safety of students is not guaranteed, then what kind of education is there to talk about?

In particular, it is possible that there is a hidden danger of causing harm to students, and this kind of thing should be done by someone in the school, instead of handing over everything to the teacher, who is already very busy preparing for class and correcting homework every day, and is also responsible for things that have nothing to do with teaching and educating people, and it is inevitable that there will be negligence.

In addition, shouldn't students and parents be informed in advance of things that have potential safety hazards and let children pay attention? If one child had known about the danger and alerted the teacher, it would not have caused so many children to be injured.

The elementary school forgot to turn off the ultraviolet light, and the whole class was illuminated for 9 hours, but no one found out that the management of this school was too bad.

I didn't know much about ultraviolet lamps, and my earliest contact was when I was working in kindergarten.

One afternoon, when school was about to end, many parents were standing at the door waiting to pick up their children, and the head teacher was teaching their children to dance inside.

I didn't know it was a UV lamp at the time, but I saw the homeroom teacher rush outside and turn off the light.

I went home at night and searched only to find that the ultraviolet disinfection lamp would cause great damage to the human body, especially to people's eyes and **.

The children in the kindergarten are in the development period, and the body organs are relatively fragile, so I can't take a second, and after reading the explanation, I understand the approach of the head teacher.

I was so shocked when I saw this news today, I was so shocked that I took photos for 9 hours in a row, and the damage to the child must have been fatal.

Sure enough, it was said in the news that many children had severe burns to their eyes, faces and necks, and it was difficult to determine whether there would be sequelae.

Isn't there a teacher in the classroom all day? Even if the teacher only stays in the teacher for 45 minutes, there should be an adverse reaction, and he is completely unaware of it?

And after 9 hours of continuous irradiation, many children will definitely feel uncomfortable, and no one from the teacher found out?

This incident shows how lax the management of this school is, and how little attention the teachers pay to the children.

Now that I think about it, the teacher who immediately stepped forward to turn off the ultraviolet lamp after seeing it was turned on by mistake is really too responsible and dedicated, and I really hope that there will be more teachers like this.