Do all causal events have a cause?

Yes. Every event happens for a reason, and it doesn't happen for no reason.

It's so simple that anyone would think so, and if so, there's no reason. Then it will not form a causal cycle.

Summary. Hello dear and happy for you: cause and effect exist objectively.

The law of cause and effect refers to the most important and direct (and can be indirect) relationship between all things. It means that any phenomenon or thing must have its cause, that is, "things have a beginning and an end", "sow melons and get melons, plant beans and get beans". The development of life in this life can be achieved by different efforts (i.e., different causes) and different developments (different results).

Does cause and effect really exist.

Hello dear and happy for you: cause and effect exist objectively. The law of cause and effect refers to the most important and direct (and can be indirect) relationship between all things.

It means that any phenomenon or thing must have its cause, that is, "things have a beginning and an end", "sow melons and get melons, plant beans and get beans". The development of life in this life can be achieved by different efforts (i.e., different causes) and different developments (different results).

Causality, also known as the "law of cause and effect". The law of cause and effect has three laws, namely: one.

Effect arises from cause: no cause can produce effect, and there must be a cause for effect. It is a time series, the cause must come first, the result can only come later, and the chronological order of the two cannot be reversed.

Two. As the relationship between the cause and the cause of objective phenomena, it exists objectively, and does not depend on human will, and has its universal rationality in things.

For example, there must be death in life, there must be dispersion in gathering, there must be separation in union, and there must be bad in success, this is an inevitable principle. Three. There is a vacancy:

Anything that produces existence must arise according to the negation of the nature of reality, and the diversity of connections between objective things determines the complexity of causal connections.

Hey, I like to be alone for five years, I insisted unilaterally, and then I persevered, she didn't pay anything to me, but I still like her very much, I believe that in my previous life because of the results of this life, I may have failed her in my previous life.

Kiss, you can continue to persevere, there will be a reward for paying.

No, five years, but she admitted the relationship, but never made me public, and I'm already disappointed that I left her some time ago.

Kiss, in fact, it is not so easy to let go of a person, you can continue to be good to him until you move him.

In addition to cause and effect, there are at least the following relationships between things.

First, the contradictory relationship, two things can not exist at the same time, there is you without me, there is me without you, the story of the legendary "spear and shield" is its classic elaboration.

Second, the relationship between the two things cannot not exist at the same time, one must exist.

Third, the transformation relation, under certain conditions, one thing can transform another thing.

Fourth, dependency, two things must work together in order to work, such as a lock and a key, and if you lose the key, the lock will lose its meaning; Without a lock, there will be nowhere to use the key.

Fifth, the relationship of opposites, the relationship of opposites is also the relationship of unity, if you don't understand, think again.

These relationships help us to understand the world outwardly, our own little universe internally, and help me to reveal all sorts of bizarre connections ...

There are many coincidences in life, and some of them are amazingly coincidental.

Cause and effect are generally considered by people only on two points and one line, and spread a little.

For example, the water glass on the table is touched by one hand, and the glass falls to the ground and breaks.

This is a natural chronological order to consider from the timeline, the cause and effect of things.

Why not think outside the box, is the world really what we think it is?

When a glass is touched by a hand, there can be many strips, and the glass falls right into the bucket below and does not break, or the glass does not fall down, but is blown away by a strange wind. There will be many effects of a cause, and the result is not certain, only at the moment when the result is formed, is the real result. For example, a person robs a bank, and a bullet goes out and ends up hitting himself (coincidental example).

In addition, talking about multiple causes, the glass fell on the ground and shattered, this is an established fact, and no one touches the glass with their hands, there is a result, but there is no cause, which is completely inconsistent with the law of three-dimensional space, in order to be logical, then there will be many reasons, for example, a cat walks by, a gust of wind blows, a soul floats by, or the earth's magnetic field is abnormal, etc., etc. It's all just to satisfy this fruit. As an example, friends who have watched "Death" know that what people are afraid of is not the Grim Reaper itself, but the powerlessness to change its intended outcome.

Thinking diffusion point, multiple causes and one effect, just for this result to be more logical; One cause has many effects, and only when the cause is established, the effect is random.

All events are actually multi-cause and multi-effect, random events drive all events, and if time is used as a connection, and the relationship between cause and effect is a point, then it will be a three-dimensional event structure.

For example, the above-mentioned bank robbery incident, he robbed the bank as a result and hit himself, and its cause factors are actually many, many inevitable conditions, first of all, he must have the idea of robbing the bank, and he wants the coincidence of the structure, caliber and even the smoothness of the bullet, etc., as well as the structure of the bank, the standing point of the robber, the angle of raising the hand, etc., etc., etc None of them will have such a result if it is not a coincidence, and it will become something else. It's like some things, after thinking about it yourself, the details in it will make you feel that the coincidences are amazing.

Cause and effect are not two points and one line, but multiple points and multiple lines (not rigorous temporary thoughts, perhaps more complicated), absolutely complex brain-burning, complex and amazing.

I think it's a cause and then an effect, not an effect and then a cause. If you create a cause based on the current result, then the cause may be different.

That is to say, there must be this result if there is a reason first, but after having this result, it is not necessarily necessary to launch only this one reason. There may be many reasons for this, but the same result can be achieved through different processes.

For example, a person has achieved success through a certain thing, but through success may not be able to launch, he must have achieved success through this thing, because 360 lines of line line champion, different people will have different ways to succeed.

In fact, there are some effects that must be there, and then the cause completes it, let's take death as an example, the effect is predestined from birth, and then the acquired cause completes the process of death until the result!

I feel through something that some unknown force or law in nature sees the effect in advance in some way, and then I apply the cause to you to achieve that effect, not as people often say, there is a cause and then an effect.

As I know at a cursory level, to quote a famous saying in Buddhism: If you want to know the cause of the past life, the recipient of this life is, and if you want to know the effect of the future life, the author of this life is. Cause and effect are as obvious and certain as eating when you are hungry, and quenching your thirst when you are thirsty and drinking water. I wish you good luck at all times.

In the politics of the graduate school entrance examination, it has been said that the reasons and consequences are.

A pair of categories that reveal the succession of things and the relationship between each other.

Causal connections are chronological, always with the cause coming first and the effect coming later, but not any successive phenomenon has a causal relationship.

The above is Ma Yuan's content, but Hume gives a different point of view.

First, he argues that our senses can only perceive individual facts, not whether there is a causal relationship between them.

Merely because certain facts are often grouped together and perceived by us, successively or simultaneously, we infer that there is a causal relationship between them.

For example, if you study hard, you can be admitted to graduate school.

To put it simply, the so-called causal relationship is nothing more than our habitual association, and we can never know whether it actually exists.

Second, what does causation mean?

It is the relationship between one fact that necessarily leads to another.

Only when such a relationship exists can it be called causality.

However, observation and experimentation are always limited, and no matter how many times we see two facts appearing at the same time or one after the other, we cannot conclude that they will always be so.

Even if you see the sun rise every morning, you can't conclude that it will rise tomorrow morning.

Experience can only explain the past, not the future, and it is impossible to draw an inevitable judgment that is always valid from experience.

And our experience is limited.

Hume's philosophical thought should give us some enlightenment, and always listen to the words of one family, which can only consolidate existing ideas, not gain new knowledge.