Is it possible to link the industrialization of the Soviet Union to the New Deal of Roosevelt in the

There is a certain connection between safeguarding its own national interests and creating economic benefits for the Soviet Union: to achieve industrialization in a short period of time and to turn the Soviet Union into a powerful industrial country.

Target: The world's industrial powers.

United States of America: Policy measures to address the acute economic crisis of an emergency nature and to avoid entering fascism.

Roosevelt's New Deal in the United States borrowed from the advantages of the Soviet Union's planned economic system, and Roosevelt's New Deal set a precedent for state regulation of the market economy in the era of capitalist liberal economy.

Similarities: both emphasize the role of the state in the economy.

Contextually, Soviet power was confronted with internal and external problems.

The United States is facing a double crisis, and the United States is facing the Great Depression.

In terms of purpose, the main purpose of the Soviet Union was to maintain the nascent Soviet power, break the strangulation of the nascent regime by imperialism and domestic opposition, and lay the economic foundation for the establishment of the socialist system. Roosevelt, Roosevelt's New Deal was to get the United States through the economic crisis. Preserve the development of capitalism.

In terms of characteristics, the Soviet Union was a highly centralized planned economic system, excluding commodities and markets, while the United States played a leading role on the premise of playing the role of the market.

In nature, the Soviet Union belonged to socialist reform, and Roosevelt's New Deal belonged to the adjustment of capitalist relations of production.

Both the New Economic Policy of the Soviet Union and Roosevelt's New Deal reflected a problem: the relations of production had to be adapted to the productive forces. If.

The relations of production do not combine the development of the productive forces, which will lead to the decline of the productive forces. Although the wartime communist policy implemented by the Soviet Union had a certain positive effect, it seriously violated the level of development of the productive forces of Soviet society, resulting in economic recession and aggravation of social contradictions. The subsequent introduction of the New Economic Policy recognized the privately-owned economy to a certain extent and abolished the surplus grain collection system.

It has promoted economic recovery and development, and also eased social contradictions. Roosevelt's New Deal came in the context of the Great Depression. There are inherent contradictions in capitalist production:

The contradiction between the socialization of production and the private ownership of the means of production. This basic contradiction determines that capitalism goes through periodic crises. And the direct cause of the emergence of the Great Depression in the 30s was:

The enormous productive forces created by the two industrial revolutions cannot be digested by society, that is, supply exceeds demand. Previously, the capitalist economy operated entirely by the "invisible hand" and the market itself. Roosevelt's New Deal strengthened the role of the "seeing hand" of state regulation.

The construction of public facilities is used to promote the recovery of social production, that is, the consumption is used to promote the development of production.

The implementation of the NEP in the USSR was aimed at restoring the national economy, establishing the basis of the socialist economy, and consolidating the alliance of workers and peasants; Roosevelt's New Deal was to preserve the order of capitalist domination and alleviate the serious damage caused by the economic crisis to the American economy.

The means are different: the former is to reduce state intervention in the economy, and the latter is to intensify state intervention in the economy.

The characteristics are different: the former is to emphasize the market economy under the dominance of the state-run economy, and develop the socialist economy with a variety of economic components at the same time; The latter, on the premise of ensuring a private economy, emphasizes a planned economy and develops capitalism.

If it's just in terms of background, purpose, etc., I think you can look it up on the Internet. I think from another point of view, human nature, the Soviet model is inhumane, thinking that everyone will fight for the realization of communism, in fact, you can understand by looking at the level of corruption at the top of them, fooling the common people and only satisfying their own selfish desires. Roosevelt's New Deal was only improved from the perspective of the first place, and the market still taught the market and let the market mediate itself, which greatly drove people's enthusiasm.

That's why the lack of humanity has led to different endings. Back to the essence, it is whether or not to serve the people. Hope it helps.

The premise of the Soviet model is that the United States encounters an economic crisis before it has the opportunity to pick up the leaks, which provides the basis for the later Soviet model, and Roosevelt's New Deal, one point is driven by German orders....

The Roosevelt New Deal refers to a series of economic policies implemented by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 after he took office in the United States, with the core three R's: relief, recovery and reform, also known as the Three Rs New Deal.

The New Deal increased direct or indirect intervention in the economy, alleviating the economic crisis and social contradictions brought about by the Great Depression. Bills such as the Emergency Banking Act, the National Industrial Rehabilitation Act, the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and the Social Security Act were enacted through the National Assembly.

2. The Soviet model is to develop a socialist economy under the socialist system. Roosevelt's New Deal was to preserve the capitalist system and consolidate capitalism.

The same: both are large-scale state intervention in the economy, and both have led to the development of the national economy.

1. The Soviet model was the recovery of the Soviet economy after the NEP. Roosevelt's New Deal was in response to the economic crisis.

2. The Soviet model is to develop a socialist economy under the socialist system. Roosevelt's New Deal was to preserve the capitalist system and consolidate capitalism.

3. The Soviet Union is a planned economy, and the United States is a market economy.

4. The Soviet Union gave priority to the development of heavy industry, and Roosevelt's New Deal first rectified the financial industry.

The similarity: both state intervention in the economy and macroeconomic regulation and control, both rely on capital and the market.

Differences: The New Economic Policy of Soviet Russia was under a planned economic system, although private or foreign capital was allowed to operate factories within a certain range, the state still controlled large enterprises and important sectors, and private capital had less rights. Although the market economy has been developed, it is not as developed as the capitalist market economy after all.

The New Economic Policy has made new attempts and opened up a new road for the socialist economy.

Roosevelt's New Deal was a policy to deal with the economic crisis, and its "cash-for-work" policies were all manifestations of state intervention in the economy, which alleviated the basic contradictions of capitalism to a certain extent. It did not change the form of the capitalist market economy. It was the precedent of state capitalism.

However, it cannot resolve the contradiction between the socialization of production and capitalist private appropriation, and therefore cannot fundamentally eradicate the economic crisis.

Similarities: Background: All were implemented in the face of an economic crisis.

The fundamental purpose: to consolidate political power.

The result: all contributed to the recovery and development of the economy and the consolidation of political power.

Differences: Focus: Luo focuses on industry; The new focus is on agriculture.

Methodological characteristics: The new economic policy of Soviet Russia is to develop capitalism within a certain range under the planned economic system, and the state controls the economic lifeline. Roosevelt's New Deal was to strengthen state intervention in the economy while maintaining the capitalist system. It was the precedent of state capitalism.

This question is not accurate, but I can only say that what the questioner wants is: "All the measures taken by the state to regulate and control the economy at the macro level have been adopted." Roosevelt's New Deal borrowed some things from the "Keynesian theory" and the Soviet Union's planned economy, while the Soviet Union adopted a centralized planned economy model.

The Soviet state controlled the economy to a greater extent than Roosevelt's New Deal.

Ross copy

The New Deal borrowed from the planned economy of the Soviet Union in the 30s. Bai implements the policy of state intervention in the economy.

However, the essence of Roosevelt's new DAO policy was to make partial adjustments to the relations of production on the premise of maintaining the capitalist system. It is not a highly centralized system of management, as in the Stalinist model.

The fundamental purpose of the two is also different. The Stalin model was designed to achieve the transition from socialism to communism. Roosevelt's New Deal, on the other hand, was to consolidate the capitalist system.

If we must summarize the common points between the two, it can only be said that "the state intervenes in the economy, pays attention to people's livelihood, and coordinates development".