If a sheep eats seedlings in someone else s field and is poisoned, should it be compensated, and who

Knowing intentionally, knowing that the sheep can not be eaten, and forcing the sheep to eat, the purpose has already been illegal, and the sheep herder should also pay the seedling fee in the farmer's field. This practice has already violated the laws and regulations, obviously love you very much to understand that the sheep will be poisoned and die after eating this kind of seedlings on the ground, in order to obtain a stronger compensation than the sheep themselves, intentionally grazing to eat, this practice is not only punished, such a situation should be punished, the harm is more serious, and criminal responsibility should also be borne.

The result is that the smart is mistaken by the smart, and the effort is scheming, and the sheep that he has worked hard to feed himself has been miserable, sighing! Hydrocyanic acid should exist in the form of cyanogenic glycosides in the above-ground seedlings of corn seedlings, sorghum seedlings, potato seedlings, and flax seed seedlings. Regardless of the circumstances, if the sheep of the sheep farmer eats the seedlings on the field with cyanogenic glycosides, the cyanogenic glycosides contained in them will be hydrolyzed in the digestive tract of the sheep that have eaten the seedlings on the ground, and the hydrocyanic acid will be hydrolyzed and released at first.

Then the cyanocation in the hydrocyanic acid will be closely combined with a variety of enzyme chemicals such as trypsin, antimycin and other enzymes in the sheep's body, and thus make the antimycin lose its original redox reaction ability, block the normal operation of the sheep's respiratory tract, so that its cells and tissues can no longer use the oxygen in the blood, and finally show acute toxic suffocation and death. It is worth mentioning that hydrocyanic acid itself can also numb the inhalation and capillary fitness motor nerve centers of sheep and other livestock. It can also cause the rapid death of sheep.

If the person who planted the seedlings on the ground was responsible for informing him of the harmful chemical fertilizer, then he would not be responsible. If there is no development bank to inform the responsibility, then both sides are at fault in this matter. The seedlings on the ground and the poison did not carry out the obligation to inform, and there was a mistake first.

The grazing should not go to the field of the seedlings on the ground to graze, there is a mistake behind. According to reason and reason, there should be no compensation, but from the perspective of laws and regulations, there will be an obligation to pay, if the billboard signs the harm of the seedlings on the ground after poisoning, then the obligation is on the sheep herder.

Of course, there should be no compensation. You need to compensate the other party's seedlings, your sheep will be poisoned when they go to other people's fields to eat, but you have already caused losses to others.

I don't think there should be compensation, because the sheep are raised by the owner, and the seedlings are planted in the field and the cardboard is written that it is poisonous, and the owner of the sheep should understand very well, and pay attention to the consequences of the sheep eating other people's seedlings in other people's fields (may be poisoned), not the seedlings that people have worked hard to plant take the initiative to let you eat.

I don't think you should pay compensation, because you ate other people's seedlings in someone else's field and were poisoned, and they didn't take the initiative to let you eat them.

According to the analysis of the specific situation, if the other party has already notified, this situation will definitely not need to be compensated, but the other party needs to be compensated.

The court ruled that the land was his own land, and he had worked hard for a year to plant it, but the result was either theft or spoiling of livestock. People lose money when they have an accident, and they lose money and criminal liability when they have an accident, and they don't let the farmer live. If the law is not amended, there Chinese few people who dare to farm the land, especially the land, and there will be no return!!

Such a judgment must not be made.

If a sheep eats seedlings in someone else's field and is poisoned, should it be compensated, and who is responsible? This kind of thing is more common in some rural areas. Why is this happening?

Generally speaking, sheep grazing is in the ditch or wasteland outside the cultivated field, and now the economic benefits of cultivated land are getting higher and higher, and there are fewer and fewer wasteland that can be grazed for sheep, so some sheep herders with bad intentions take advantage of the absence of people to drive the sheep into the wheat field and gnaw on it. If the wheat is eaten well by the sheep, the yield will be reduced by at least 30%, and the owner of the wheat field will definitely be angry when he finds it.

If the sheep ate the seedlings and was poisoned as the title said, the owner of the seedlings should not compensate and has no responsibility. Instead, the sheep should be held accountable for damage to crops. This question is different from other sheep poisoning cases, in the past case, the owner of the land on the crops (seedlings) sprayed, sheep poisoned and died.

It is said that the landlord is applying medicine to prevent and control pests and diseases, and the sheep are poisoned and die, and the landlord is not wrong with normal agricultural management. However, in the spirit of humanitarianism, it can be said that the landlord will pay a little compensation. After all, there are no warning signs or measures to avoid accidental ingestion poisoning of humans and animals after spraying, (for example, melons and fruits are drugged, and ignorant children are poisoned and die) In terms of causality, there is more or less responsibility.

In this question, I think that the landlord has no responsibility and does not need to compensate the owner of the sheep.

Because, whether you deliberately graze and eat other people's seedlings, or the sheep run away and eat the seedlings yourself, the responsibility lies with the owner of the sheep, and you have not supervised your sheep well, and there is no reason to find the responsibility of others. Besides, the seedlings are crops, not for you to feed the sheep. The owner of the seedlings did not apply medicine.

As a rural person, unless very young people don't understand, the average farmer knows that there are many kinds of crops and seedlings that are toxic by themselves, (I can't say what poison specifically), the toxicity is not highly toxic, and occasionally eating a few leaves or a few trees is not a big problem, and livestock will be poisoned and even die if they eat too much.

The owner of the sheep should also understand that this is called asking for trouble, and the landlord is not responsible. If the destruction of the seedlings is serious and affects the growth of the seedlings, the landlord can also hold the owner of the sheep liable for compensation!

If the owner of the land sees that your sheep has died, he has sympathy and pity, and does not hold the owner of the sheep responsible, or expresses sympathy and gives the owner of the sheep a little compensation, then the owner of the land has high morals and righteousness!

Now for the main business. If a sheep eats seedlings in someone else's field and is poisoned, should it be compensated, and who is responsible? It can be said that the responsibility lies with the sheep herder.

The difference between wheat field and wasteland, wheat seedlings and grass is very obvious, so it is obvious that the sheep gnawed the wheat seedlings for the purpose of seeking improper benefits to harm others and benefit themselves, and this kind of behavior is not protected by law.

Of course, if the sheep herder has evidence to prove that the owner of the wheat field was intentional or negligent, and this intention or negligence infringes on his legitimate rights and interests, he can file a claim, the problem is that it is difficult to prove that the other party is intentional or negligent, and it is also difficult to prove that he is not at fault as the owner of the sheep, so the best way is to take care of his sheep in the future, and do not go to other people's fields to gnaw wheat seedlings at will.

Others certainly don't need to be responsible for this matter, and they didn't deliberately poison other people's sheep, this responsibility still lies with the owner of the sheep, if it weren't for not taking good care of their own sheep, such a thing would not have happened at all.

should not be compensated, this responsibility lies with himself, it is his freedom for others to plant something, and he should be responsible for this matter because he did not control the sheep well.

It must not be compensated, it is to steal and eat the fields in other people's homes. It shows that it is caused by the sheep itself in life, not by the other party, and can only be borne by oneself.

If the sheep eats the seedlings in someone else's field and is poisoned, the other party cannot be allowed to compensate, whose sheep is responsible!

Crops have a variety of pests and diseases, in order to eliminate crop pests and diseases, no matter in which growth stage of crops, as long as there are pests and diseases, it is necessary to spray pesticides to sanitize, spraying pesticides on crops, it is reasonable and legal, if you do not look at your sheep, run to other people's farmland to eat the seedlings of other people's farmland and be poisoned by pesticides, that is your sheep self-inflicted, then you can only consider yourself unlucky, the owner of the sheep is responsible for it!

If someone's sheep eats someone else's seedlings and is poisoned, except that the owner of the sheep thinks he is unlucky and is responsibleFor the owner of the sheep to eat the seedlings, you also have to compensate for the loss of the seedlings, and how many seedlings your sheep eat, you have to compensate for the losses of others. As for the amount of loss and compensation, these two can negotiate and settle, and if they can't be solved, they can be resolved by the village committee, and if the village committee can't solve it, it can be solved through legal means!

What do peasants live on? It is to rely on planting crops, that is, to wait until the autumn grain harvest after selling grain money, to solve the life of a family, your sheep eat other people's seedlings, it is equivalent to cutting off the road of people's life, but also must compensate others, if your sheep eat other people's seedlings, the loss caused to others is not compensated, the law is not allowed, the heavens are not allowed, think about it, if it is someone else's sheep eat your seedlings, causing losses to your family, you also have to make a claim, If their sheep eat your seedlings and are poisoned, you will definitely say that they deserve it!

According to the relevant provisions, if you deliberately drive your own sheep to someone else's green seedling land for grazing, it is the crime of intentionally damaging property, and if the amount of damage to property is relatively large or the circumstances are serious, you will be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or a fine, and if the circumstances are particularly serious, you will be sentenced to imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years!

No. Because it is the responsibility of the owner of the sheep to go to someone else's field, the owner of the field cannot be compensated.

Yes, because this case is an indirect death, and the other party is half responsible, so you can negotiate compensation with the other party.

Your sheep secretly ran away from someone else's house and ate its seedlings, and then it was poisoned, and it has nothing to do with the other party, and this is all your own responsibility.

As a sheep herder, you should know that sheep can't eat other people's crops or other people's grain, but now you still put your sheep in other people's wheat fields, this situation is a bit difficult to judge. And the other party applied pesticides to his own wheat, not to poison your family, but to kill insects, so at this time you don't need to go to others for compensation, it's good if others don't come to you. <>

For rural people, crops are actually the basis of their survival, only after turning these crops into money, this period of effort is rewarded, if there is an accident in the crops during this time, all the hard work during this period is in vain. Some people actually apply pesticides after planting crops, which can also kill the pests above and make the crops grow better, but some people put their sheep in other people's wheat fields, and these sheep will also eat these crops in the wheat fields, resulting in being killed by medicine. If you deliberately put your sheep in someone else's wheat field to eat, it can only be said that you are doing it yourself, but if you are not careful, you can go and discuss it with the other person.

After finding out that the sheep was drugged to death, you can discuss with the owner of the wheat field to see if you can reach an agreement, or if there is a compensation, most of the villages are familiar people, all of them are villagers, and they don't see what they look up to see, and there is no knot that cannot be dissolved. But if you say that you did it on purpose, then I think you don't want to ask others for compensation, and it's good if others don't come to you for compensation. A sheep herder must also know that sheep cannot eat other people's crops, but you still put sheep in other people's crops when you know these things, that is your problem.

We must find a correct place when herding sheep, the right time, to avoid sheep eating something that should not be eaten, you must know that now a sheep seedling also needs a lot of money, only by selling this sheep, we can be considered to have a harvest, so don't do something harmful to others and yourself.

Yes, after all, your losses are very heavy. But if the wheat field belongs to the other party, you have to apologize to the other party and compensate for the loss, but the other party also has to give you the loss.

You can ask the other party to compensate, but you also have to bear part of the responsibility, because you are hurting the rights and interests of others by herding sheep in the wheat field.

Generally speaking, you can't ask the other party to compensate, because this is your fault first, and it is a very immoral behavior for you to herd sheep in the wheat field.