An 8 year old boy was bitten to death by a farmer s vicious dog, and the lawyer said that he could b

Because this is a human life, this is a human life in the flower bones, so he was sentenced to 7 years without him, I think it is too light, after all, this is a living human life, he has not seen the great rivers and mountains of the motherland.

Netizens said that it was unfair because in terms of compensation and sentencing reasons, the compensation standards for rural and urban hukou are different, and the boy should be sentenced according to the compensation standards of rural hukou.

This is because the boy was actually a victim, and the farmer was relatively innocent at the time, so many netizens said that it was very unfair to sentence such a number of years.

Because the 8-year-old boy lost his life, and the dog owner was sentenced to 7 years, which is not very long.

This is because this little boy is a relatively fresh life, and he is relatively young, and at the same time, the owner of this dog has a particularly heavy responsibility in this matter.

Because the truth of the matter is that the little boy went to someone else's house to provoke the dog in someone's yard, resulting in being bitten to death by the dog.

Because the boy's death caused a lot of pain to his family, netizens felt that such a sentence was very unfair.

After all, this little boy was bitten to death by a vicious dog in a farmer's house, is this life only worth 7 years, so netizens will say that it is unfair.

Because the child lost his life, but the farmer did not pay the corresponding price, and felt that the punishment was too light.

Causing death.

The child died so miserably, the sky is about to fall, and I must ask the child for an explanation. These are the words of the father of the little boy who was bitten to death by a vicious dog. Originally, around 6 in the morning, the little boy, a second-grade student at Fengjie Primary School in Chongqing, should be on the way to school, on the way every day, but he forgot to bring his bus card halfway, so the little boy walked first, and his grandfather returned home to get the bus card.

But who would have thought that a vicious dog would attack the little boy and be bitten to death. How helpless the child must have been in the face of three vicious dogs. After a preliminary forensic examination, the child died of traumatic shock and tracheal disconnection.

How painful, how painful the child is. At present, the dog owner is under control on suspicion of negligence causing death, but the incident is still in the follow-up process. The lawyer said the sentence could be up to seven years.

The follow-up issue of this matter is the issue of compensation for a young man in the flower season, although it hurts our hearts. But the law that should be followed still has to be followed, and the compensation is still compensated. The boy's family claimed compensation of 920,000 yuan according to the standard of urban household registration.

Although the boy has a rural hukou, he is studying in the city, and he also has a temporary residence permit, which is completely different from the rural hukou. However, the owner of the dog who caused the accident wanted to follow the compensation standard in the countryside, and could only compensate about 400,000 yuan. Although there is a law that stipulates that compensation can be made according to the urban household registration for traffic accident cases where the boy has lived in the city for one year, this case is a general personal injury case, because the boy has a rural household registration, and the compensation is still based on the standard of the rural household registration.

From May 1, walking a dog without a leash is suspected of violating the law.

In fact, the biggest mistake in this case was to keep a dog without a leash. The dog owner raised three dogs to watch the family, usually does not leash them, and not long ago bit a dog in the same village to death. Such a dog is enough to attract attention.

Nowadays, many people walk their dogs without leashes, thinking that their dogs are well-behaved and will not bite. But as an animal, it bites or not, do you know? Can you take responsibility for their personal safety?

Fortunately, from May 1stArticle 30 of the Animal Epidemic Prevention Law of the People's Republic of China, which has been officially implemented, clearly stipulates that if a dog is taken out of the house, it shall wear a dog tag and take measures such as tethering the dog according to the regulations. In other words, walking a dog without a leash or not wearing a dog tag will be suspected of violating the law. So for their safety, it's best to keep the dog on a leash.

Dogs are able to understand their owner's intentions and actively attack others. If the dog owner deliberately instigates the dog to bite the victim, causing **, it constitutes the crime of intentional injury.

If there is gross negligence in management, it may constitute the crime of negligence causing death.

Be. Although it is not a friendship, but the dog is your pet, since the dog has such a great malice, it should be imprisoned and should not be connived to go out to do evil and pose a threat to the lives of others.

Yes, he was manslaughter, because the dog was raised by him, and he did not stop the process when his vicious dog bit the little boy and bit the little boy to death, so he is also legally responsible.

I think the owner of the dog is also legally responsible, and he didn't keep his vicious dog in check. Causing others to die, so its owner must be held legally responsible.

Suspected. Your dog didn't close it well, and let it come out casually, especially the kind of dog that likes to bite people, and the owner is responsible for biting people.

Be. According to the laws and regulations of our country, the owner of the dog did not hold the dog on a leash, so it led to this tragedy.

I don't think 550,000 is much, but a human life cannot be measured in money.

The course of this tragedy, which occurred on the morning of April 22. Grandpa takes his grandson to elementary school. Because the parents work outside the home, the children are generally taken by grandparents.

When they reached a village road in the village, the grandfather noticed that he did not have a bus card and asked his grandson to go first. The child was walking on the road, and three dogs jumped out of the side of the road, biting the child beyond recognition, and died after being rescued. Upon arrival, two of them were culled and the other was subsequently dealt with, according to the relevant reports.

The owner of the dog was also controlled by Feng Jie** for manslaughter.

In most cases, pet owners don't have much of a problem with keeping their pets. Sometimes, it's just a moment of negligence that leads to tragedy. In addition, the owners of the three dogs had problems keeping their pets.

The owners of the three dogs are in the cold and cold meat business, and they usually feed the dogs raw meat, and the dogs eat raw meat and bones for a long time. The dogs had just killed a dog a few days earlier. As you can imagine, these dogs have problems feeding themselves.

Their owners fed the dogs raw meat for a long time, which made the dogs become meat-loving and more sensitive to meat, thus laying the foundation for this incident.

For the boy's parents, no amount of money can make up for the loss of their child. For the boy's parents, 550,000 yuan will not compensate for their pain. The child's grip is the pride of his parents and the lifeblood of his parents, which cannot be measured by money.

The 550,000 Rana is just a little comfort to the boy's parents. If they could, I'm sure they would rather pay double the money for their child's life. If you can let the child live, then 550,000 is not needed.

It's understandable to love dogs, but dog owners should also be optimistic about their dogs. Dog owners are responsible for the safety of others. If something like this happens, they will not only have to pay for themselves, but also have serious consequences for others.

For example, in a news event, the boy's parents lost the person they cherished the most because of something like this.

I think the child's father also has his own considerations, and in the end, this tragedy can get a mutually satisfactory ending, which is also a blessing in misfortune.

I feel that dog owners should be condemned. Because the dog owner is very irresponsible, it leads to the tragedy when he goes out without a leash.

After all, the child is dead, and Lao Pei, who was bitten to death by a dog, continuing to entangle will only make him more troubled, and agreeing to reconciliation is also a good thing, and Zao Yu is only a comfort in arguing like this.

Personally, I think that the owner of the dog must bear the relevant compensation, after all, I think the dog owner must bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

I believe that liability should be determined through legal means and legal means. Of course, the liability must be borne by the owner of the vicious dog, who did not manage his dog well.

First of all, the case has already caused a life-threatening situation, so the dog owner must bear the majority of the responsibility. If necessary, the vicious dogs are kept and educated. The specific crime of the boy depends on the ins and outs of the case, and what caused the vicious dog to bite him.

But it is certain that the boy's sin will not be great.

Of course, it should be the owner of the dog who bears the main responsibility, and then the insurance company should pay a certain amount of insurance to provide a certain amount of compensation for the child's family.

There should be the owner of the dog to compensate, and the impact of this incident is more serious, so try to stay away from those dogs.

It must be the full responsibility of the three vicious dogs, and then the owner of the vicious dog should be found, and the owner should be asked to compensate for all the responsibility.

Parents should protect their legitimate rights and interests through the law and not be infringed upon by anyone.

The most direct way to defend your rights is to go through the normal legal process, talk about the available evidence and provide it to your lawyer, and wait for the court to summon you.

First of all, the family should obtain a disability certificate from the hospital and then claim compensation from the owner of the vicious dog through the law. And the surveillance video of the incident at that time was used as evidence.

Families should hold the owner of this dog fully accountable, and if they don't want to be responsible, then they should seek help from **.

People can't be resurrected after death, I think this father is also very sad, although this money can't alleviate the pain of losing a child, but I think he also hopes that this will be the end of this matter.

The settlement amount is not 920,000 as mentioned before, but 550,000. As for why the settlement amount was lowered, the boy's father said that it was because the two families were from the same village, so after several negotiations, Li Ma finally decided to take a step back. Although the parties have given in, the law should give in, and those responsible in this incident and such behavior should be severely punished.

In fact, this incident is also an accident, and the child has passed away, in fact, they have no choice but to accept the loss is the most advantageous.

I think that the father values money more than the child, and if it were me, it would never be possible to reconcile.

Also, in response to the fact that the boy in Fengjie, Chongqing was bitten to death by three vicious dogs, the child's father said: At present, the former Mingru has reconciled with the other party's family, and the settlement amount is 550,000, and the choice of reconciliation is mainly based on the reasons of Huiqi Village.

It may be because of this father's helpless choice. After all, his own child is dead. No matter how much accountability is pursued, there is simply no way to do it.

I can't accept this kind of reconciliation, because my own children are gone, and the blow must be very big.

I think that if I were this boy who was trapped and was bitten to death by a vicious dog, these 550,000 yuan would never be able to relieve the hatred in my heart, and this is not just something that can be solved by reparations.

As long as this matter is reasonably resolved, as long as the other party can accept it, it is a good thing that it is harmonious now.

I can't understand the approach of the child's parents, 550,000, now this society has bought the child's life, and he still has decades to go.

It doesn't matter what I think, as long as the father thinks it's worth it, maybe their family is more difficult and too short of money.

"The boy was bitten to death by a vicious dog".Recently, a self-** has aroused social concern, a boy's father spoke out on the self-** platform, saying that his child was attacked by three vicious dogs on the way to school and died, the child's grandfather took the child to school in the early morning of the incident, and the child's grandfather found that he forgot to take the bus card to go out, so he let the child go to the bus station slowly, and he returned home to get the card. The child was bitten and attacked by three vicious dogs on the side of the road, and was finally bitten beyond recognition, and then 120 rescue efforts were ineffective and he was declared dead. After the incident, the local public security department killed two of the vicious dogs as soon as possible, and the third vicious dog was also dealt with later, and the owner of the vicious dog was also arrested on suspicion of negligence causing death.

The boy's father accepted the reconciliationFollowing the death of the boy by the vicious dog, according to the latest news, the boy's father recently reached a settlement with the family of the owner of the vicious dog, and the settlement amount was 550,000, not the 920,000 as previously claimed.

What should we do when we encounter a vicious dogWhen we encounter a vicious dog, the first try not to look directly into the dog's eyes, to avoid the dog being provoked, and then attack you, the second is to do our best to protect your vital parts, if you are unfortunately really attacked by the vicious dog, has been bitten by the vicious dog, then you should try to protect your throat and head, because the dog's nature will be brought into play when attacking, directly attack the fatal point of the prey, that is, our throat and head, and the third should shout for help, seek the rescue of others, At this time, the last thing in your hand is to take some objects in your hand, one is to block the dog's attack, and the other is to use it to fight the vicious dog and protect yourself.