How to respond logically to an unfalsifiable sentence?

I want to say that logic is of course important, for example, if you regard being able to speak well as a "martial art", logic is just a move, knowledge is skill, and if you don't practice martial arts until you are old, since you are interested in such a problem, then it is not more beneficial to yourself to understand it than to refute others "logically". Hope it helps.

I think it's very easy, it's a sentence that can't be corrected, so it's easy to say it logically, and then you can say it after you clear your mind.

What does it mean to be unfalsifiable?

To put it bluntly, "unfalsifiable" is actually the kind of rogue logic that "can never be wrong". So science must be falsifiable, so that we should argue with our own opinions.

We have to keep gathering relevant materials, spend some time sorting them out, sorting out the context, and then integrating ideas. For example, if you regard being able to speak well as a "martial art", logic is just a move, and knowledge is a skill.

If you want to respond to an unfalsifiable sentence, first of all, you have to sort out your thinking logic, and only by clarifying the thinking logic can you be good.

If you want a logical response, a sentence that is not positive, you can put the sentence in another environment to test whether the sentence works.

It is necessary to carry out some theories in another specific environment, find some breakthrough points, and break through its original specific environment.

When talking to people, it is inevitable that they will be maliciously attacked or ridiculed and embarrassed by others. Tolerance is one way to deal with this situation, but it should also be possible to refute it appropriately when necessary. The key to rebuttal is to be logical and speak strongly, appropriately, and to the point.

Here are 6 logical counterbuttals that you can use to make your own arguments. Really smart people usually have these 6 logical rebuttal techniques when they speak, and they are never afraid of being made difficult.

Methods & Techniques. When someone tries to make things difficult for you with some ridiculous question, an affirmative is usually not a good rebuttal. At this time, it is a good choice to use the same strange language, strange strange, oblique, strange to ask strange, the essence of which is according to the content and changes of the other party's question, contradictions, do not adhere to common sense, logic is not too strict, only need to prove, so that the opponent is speechless.

The opposite statement. If you tell the truth about ordinary words, there will be no new ideas, and the impression will be relatively flat. But if you put it the other way around, you get a very different effect.

In the face of other people's speech difficulties, sometimes if it is not appropriate to fight back directly, we should also be good at saying the opposite, by pointing out the other party relatively tactfully, not only can we subtly show their attitude, but we can also directly avoid offending the other party, which will not lead to too embarrassing situations.

<> a tooth for a tooth. A tooth for a tooth is to grasp the key point of the other party's words when someone creates trouble for you, directly refute them, and point out the mistakes and absurdities of the other party. To use this logical rebuttal technique, we must first pay attention to the momentum, to have a condescending, unstoppable, and aggressive momentum; secondly, the rebuttal should be accurate and targeted, even if it is one point, regardless of others; Finally, do better than your opponent on the counter-attack.

Don't let others use bad strategies, and neither do you.

Extend to errors. In the face of other people's difficulties, they will not directly refute the other party and point out the other party's mistakes, but first assume that the other party is "right", and then let the logic expand and reason to come to a ridiculous result, so that the other party will take the initiative to realize their own mistakes, this is the skill of extending and refuting mistakes. Taking the false as true and refuting the premise with the conclusion is a rebuttal technique.

Using it, like driving a horse to the edge of a cliff or climbing a high ladder, can put the other person in a very awkward position. Often, it can be refuted with one sentence.

Siege Wei to save Zhao. When speaking to refute someone else's difficulties, there are several main situations. At this point, you might as well look for other counter-points in the other person's words.

If the other party's difficulties are irrational and difficult for you to accept, you can also irrationally put forward the other party's unacceptable views, and once the other party questions them, you can use them to refute his original conclusion; Others use ridiculous evidence to draw ridiculous conclusions to make things difficult for you. At this point, it is advisable to use his absurd evidence base, which the other side is unwilling to accept and let him bear the consequences.

You should understand some of the connotations of this sentence, and at the same time, you should pay attention to some of the logic and orderliness, and methodically every key point, so that you can respond to an unfalsifiable sentence with logic.

It can be proved backwards, and the condition can be verified by the result, so that it can be judged whether the sentence is true or not.

It is necessary to find the weakness of the other person's language, and then break through from this point, so that you can respond to the other person logically.