An example is analyzed from a behaviorist, psychoanalytic, humanistic point of view

Example: 4-year-old Ming Ming likes to imitate his father. Whatever Dad wears, he must wear; Whatever Dad does, he will do.

Obviously, I also like to learn from my father to repair things. He used to follow his parents' example of repairing things and toys in the house, only to break them. Although his parents often criticize him for this, he feels a great sense of accomplishment whenever this happens.

Different schools of thought look at mental health.

's perspective is different.

Psychoanalytic psychological problems generally begin with the client's early childhood experiences to compensate for satisfying desires;

Behaviorism emphasizes influencing the client's cognition and emotions by changing old behaviors and shaping new ones;

Humanism asserts that people have the ability to be self-a**, to accompany the client to find their own resources through compassion and unconditional positive attention.

Such a huge proposition.

Psychoanalysis is to dig deep into the influence of your childhood life on your current life, and psychoanalysis is used in pathology.

Behaviorism is the behavior of popular people who influence the behavior of others, and behaviorism is mainly used in economic education management.

Humanism is the concept of judging right and wrong from the basic and normal needs of human beings, and human beings are seemingly simple but the most varied, and there are no hard and fast rules.

The difference between psychoanalysis and humanism in determining the goals of the client.

Different schools of thought do have different approaches when it comes to consulting goals. Psychoanalysts sometimes do not discuss the goal with the client at all, and the goal is completely in the mind of the person; Psychoanalysts tend to think that the client is not easy to understand, and that understanding is not helpful, and these goals do not need to be known to the client. People-centered believes that psychological counseling should have a definite ultimate goal, because clear goals have the effect of shortening the first time period and stimulating the enthusiasm of the parties, so in psychological counseling, it is preferable to formally discuss the goals and absorb the opinions of the parties.

Comparison of perspectives on the issues of the parties.

Due to Freud's medical background, the diagnostic model focuses on looking at the patient from the perspective of "problem" and "disease", which indirectly prompts the person to "construct" his client in a negative way. However, if a person's reaction is to look at the world in a "mental illness" construction system, then he will construct a world full of problems and psychological abnormalities. He will turn a blind eye to the positive, growing forces in the client.

From the perspective of how to make the parties grow up healthily and pay attention to the positive factors and value embodiment of the parties, self-realization is its highest state.

Psychoanalysis is a highly emotional relationship between the patient and the ** person in search of empathy in a dependent manner. Emotional migration relationships sometimes occur.

But for humanistic psychologists, it is more important to establish a person-to-person relationship. Rogers found that this kind of person-to-person relationship is instructive for building interpersonal trust and an attitude of mutual acceptance. One of the principles of Bugenthal's humanistic ethics is to build emotional resonance in relationships.

Humanistic psychologists see the problem of discovering values and beliefs as one of the most complex and urgent problems of our time. Bühler pointed out that helping the patient clarify his personal value system is one of the important tasks of modern psychologists.

Therefore, their different perspectives on the parties are due to the differences in the concepts they establish.

Psychoanalysis, with the subconscious and conscious of the mind as the main object of study Behaviorism, with the explicit behavior of people as the main object of study.

Behaviorism and psychoanalysis are two ** concepts, specific to various fields because behaviorism is more widely applicable, extending more fields and in a strong position, and because behaviorism is based on physiological basis as the starting thought, so in today's era of scientific thought advocating experimental conclusions are recognized by more people. But this is not to say that psychoanalysis is not mainstream, because classical psychoanalysis involves too much sex, and the view of human nature is inherently evil, so it has been more refuted and opposed. Slowly psychoanalysis became today's psychodynamics.

So when you compare psychoanalysis and behaviorism, it's like comparing a baby to a prime of life, there's no comparison. If there is to be a comparison, the modern one should be behaviorism versus psychodynamics, and the areas to be compared should be indicated, such as the former neurosis is suitable for patients with obvious symptoms and clear symptoms, while the psychodynamic theory of repression is very good at dealing with patients with neurosis who cannot be diagnosed. Organic psychosis is inferior to psychiatry, and behaviorist shocks are relatively effective, but are also commonly reported.

Modern psychoanalysis should contrast the Enlightenment idea of behaviorism, that is, the theory of psychoanalysis on conditioning. Of course, such comparisons are meaningless. I think it's a bit too much for the landlord to use the word transcendence, because the science that appears and develops for the purpose of ** should take the efficacy as evidence of its value.

In this regard, behaviorism is not the same as the ability to deal with diseases with fine divisions, so how can it be surpassed, it can only be said that the concept of deriving theories from experimental data adhered to by behaviorism is more in line with modern scientific thought, and our science is far from reaching the level of being able to analyze personality in a systematic structure. You can say that psychoanalysis is subjective assumptions, or you can say that behaviorism is ignoring the system. These are all things that modern physiological science cannot give a structural basis.

But now that the patient has become more and more diversified, there are few people who use only the separate methods of behaviorist living psychoanalysis.

Behaviorist psychology asserts that psychology is a science and that the study of science is limited to the processing of objective data in an objective way. Introspection is not an objective method, and the experience of consciousness obtained by using the introspective method is not an objective material. The most important of the claims of behaviorist psychology are the following:

1) Emphasizing that the researcher of scientific psychology is only an explicit behavior that can be objectively observed and measured by others. (2) The basis of the behavior is the reaction of the individual, and the whole of the behavior can be known by collecting multiple reactions. (3) Individual behavior is not innate, not genetically determined, but passively learned by environmental factors.

4) The principles of behavior obtained from experiments on animals and children can be deduced and explained by the same kind of behavior of ordinary people. This behaviorist orientation, which is based purely on the criterion of "objective objectivity", is also known as radical behaviorism.

After the development of behaviorism in the thirties, its strict adherence to the natural sciences was criticized. Some scholars who originally belonged to the behavioral school no longer insisted on the principle of "objective objectivity" and eventually accepted the idea that consciousness is one of the subjects of psychological research. Those who hold this theoretical orientation in behaviorist psychology are called neo-behaviorist psychology.

The methodological objectivism advocated by behaviorists has had a significant impact on the development of psychology.

The main perspectives of behaviorist psychology.

1) The object of psychology is not consciousness but behavior.

Watson adheres to the fundamental principle of objectivity common to all sciences. The basic characteristic of his behaviorist psychology is the denial of the object of traditional psychology of psychology or consciousness, and replacing it with behavior. Behaviour is a combination of bodily responses that an organism uses to adapt to changes in its environment.

Watson once distinguished human responses into appearance habit responses (such as opening the door and playing ball), implicit habit responses (such as thinking, i.e., silent language), appearance genetic responses (such as blinking, grasping), and implicit genetic responses (such as endocrine gland secretion). Watson boils down the mind or consciousness to implicit and slight behavior. He pointed out that thoughts and emotions that have always been thought to be purely conscious are actually implicit and subtle physical changes.

Thinking is an intrinsic and slight response of the muscles of the whole body, especially the laryngeal muscles.

It's their own theory.

Psychoanalytic strongly believes that when there is a conflict between the id and the superego, and the ego is unable to reconcile, it will cause anxiety in the individual, and in order to reduce this anxiety, the ego will activate defense mechanisms. When this defense is overused, the ego is weakened, and it is unable to resist this conflict, and neurosis and other psychological diseases can be formed. Techniques include dream interpretation, free association, etc.

Behaviorism emphasizes acquisition. The basic theories of human deviant behavior are learned are not Skinner's operant conditioning, Pavlov's conditioning and Bandura's social learning theory. Techniques are some of the technologies derived from those three theories.

Humanism is from the needs side. Maslow's hierarchy of needs. This emphasizes empathy and promotes self-knowledge and self-reconstruction in a good atmosphere.

It's all hand-beaten. Seek adoption.

The starting point is different, psychoanalysis attaches importance to the subconscious, libido, etc., and the commonly used technique is dream interpretation; Behaviorism emphasizes the shaping role of the environment in shaping people, and behavior change techniques (e.g., system desensitization); Humanism emphasizes people's own value and people's pursuit of value, and the starting point of psychological counseling is humanism, believing that the process of counseling is people's self-improvement.

The answer downstairs is so general that it is suspected of misleading people's children......In terms of refinement alone, in the past 100 years, there have been classical theories, cultural schools and object relations schools, autologous psychology and interpersonal relations. The Lacanian school and so on, the pathological view has also changed from repression and conflict to the perspective of personality development, and the dynamic perspective has also expanded from the vertical conflict of the three selfs to the field of culture and interpersonal relations. It is no longer the main theoretical point of Freud's time that can be summed up.

If the landlord is a new learner, it is not advisable to pay too much attention to the theoretical differences and main techniques of the psychology school. The first thing to figure out is that psychology and psychology are two completely different things. The former is a theoretical construct based on statistical criteria, while the latter is clinical.

If you talk about it together, you will only make yourself dizzy.

It is recommended that you first find a story about psychology, such a popular reading book, and have an overall understanding of psychology. Read it thoroughly, and your problem will be solved. Otherwise, there are many small theories in psychology, and it is easy to lead yourself to the ditch.

This is a very complex question, and it involves many concepts from psychology and sociology. Let's just put it simply.

1. Psychoanalysis emphasizes the subconscious and instinct, and pays more attention to the influence of social factors on people.

2. Behaviorism obviously emphasizes the impact of the external environment on people.

3. Humanism believes that people have potential, not by instinct to decide together, and does not agree with the behaviorist mechanization of people, which is not as extreme as the first two.

For detailed information, you need to look through professional books to study.