-
iec 60092-303-1980+amd1-1997。The domestic standard GB T 22194-2008 is equivalent to using translation, also known as IDT, which is simply copying. What is written in the GB is the 1997 version, which does not exist, and the IEC has not merged this version.
It's just that when the national standard is cited, the year of the current revision of AMD1-1997 is written at the end. When using, you can directly use the national standard. If you are not sure, you can refer to IEC 60092-303 for comparative use.
Expansion: Domestic standards are equivalent to IEC and ISO standards, and some foreign standards can be used directly in the current version, and if the obsolete version is used, it must be used cautiously, and the data will change.
Bocheng Standard Translation Network specializes in providing standard translation services, with ten years of experience in standard translation.
-
IEC60092-303 is equivalent to GB T 22191-2008 in China
IEC 60092-303 is an international standard for marine electrical equipment, which came into force on October 2, 2002.
China's corresponding is: ship electrical equipment, equipment, lamps and accessories standard (GB T 22191-2008), implemented in 2008.
-
IEC60332 This is the flame retardant standard for individual cables. The test stipulates that a 60cm long specimen is vertically fixed in a metal box with an open front wall, and a propane burner with a flame length of 175mm contacts the cable at an angle of 45 degrees from a position of 450mm from the upper fixed end of the specimen, and if the burning damage part of the specimen is not more than 50mm away from the lower part of the fixed end, the test passes.
IEC flame retardant ratingIn order to evaluate the flame retardant performance of cables, the International Electrotechnical Commission has formulated three standards: IEC60332-1, IEC60332-2 and IEC60332-3. IEC60332-1 and IEC60332-2 are used to evaluate the flame retardancy of a single cable when placed at an inclined and vertical level, respectively.
IEC60332-3 is used to evaluate the flame retardant capacity of bundled cables when burned vertically, compared to the requirements for flame retardant capacity when bundled cables are burned vertically.
-
IEC60332 is a series of international electrotechnical standards for "tests of cables and optical cables under fire conditions" formulated by the International Electrotechnical Commission, and currently has 11 parts, see the figure below
Correspondingly, China is equivalent to adopting these series of standards, as shown in the figure below
-
IEC60332 is to evaluate the flame retardant performance of cables, and the International Electrotechnical Commission has formulated IEC60332-1, IEC60332-2 and IEC60332-3 standards. IEC60332-1 and IEC60332-2 are used to evaluate the flame retardancy of a single cable when deployed at an inclined and vertical level, respectively (national correspondence and standard). IEC60332-3 (domestic correspondence is used to evaluate the flame retardant capacity of bundled cables when they are burned vertically, compared with the requirements for flame retardant capacity when bundled cables are burned vertically.
-
IEC 60332 Test of Cables under Fire Conditions.
Release: Implementation:
Currently in effect.
LS, AMD's 4 cores have been sold for a long time, I don't know why you haven't seen it >>>More
The height of the boy is 1.71 meters. That is equivalent to the height of a girl about 1.6 meters. One meter seventy-one, too short.
The Dimensity 1000 processor is MediaTek's flagship processor that hits the high-end market, with performance between the Snapdragon 855 processor and the Snapdragon 865 processor. >>>More
Theoretically, AMD Athlon64 3000+ is equivalent to, comparable to, in fact slightly inferior. The frequency of AMD 3000+ is about the same. If you use Win XP, you will definitely use AMD Athlon64 or P4 well, in terms of dealing with multi-** and other aspects. >>>More
The Dimensity 1000+ has a processor between the Snapdragon 855 and the Snapdragon 865. Just looking at the running score data, it is better than Kirin 990, and the key is to see the optimization ability of major mobile phone manufacturers for this CPU.