The relocation of new rural construction is voluntary, how to deal with those who are unwilling to r

1. The construction of the new countryside abides by the principle of resource optimization, but it is more people-oriented. The new rural construction relocation project has been officially implemented for many years, I believe everyone is familiar with it, the background of the birth of this project is that many rural labor force go out to work, resulting in the abandonment of rural farmland and forest land. Moreover, because of the loss of young and middle-aged people, the people who stay in the countryside are some old and young women and children, and there are widespread problems such as no one to take care of the elderly, difficulties for children to go to school, and simple and boring life.

There is a very important point here, although it seems that the concentration of people from many villages in one village is to facilitate the management and optimization of resources, the essence is to take care of left-behind children and the elderly who are lonely, because relocation brings people from several villages into one village, and at the same time, our control and development power over some areas is also reduced.

Therefore, many relocation projects have also introduced some ecological orchards, botanical gardens, and farm construction projects, which seem to be the products of centralized management and optimal allocation of resources, but in fact, they have also borne a certain amount of pressure.

2. The construction of the new countryside follows the principle of minority obeying the majority. In most cases, the construction of the new countryside follows the principle of minority obeying the majority, and before starting to relocate, a meeting will be held to hold a meeting for democratic voting according to the opinions of the villagers, and according to the results of the vote, the minority will obey the majority to decide whether to relocate, and then discuss how to relocate.

Although there may be a situation where the will of a small number of people is violated, it is also in line with the scientific concept of development for the minority to obey the majority, after all, the choice of the majority can represent the choice of the people's heart. In the case of limited conditions, only the desire of the majority can be prioritized, and sometimes it is reasonable for individuals in the group to make sacrifices for the collective.

Moreover, because of the quality of the villagers, those who voted against it also voted on the basis of personal feelings, rather than for the development of the village collective, and their votes themselves were not objective enough.

3. If the individual who does not want to relocate has the ability to take care of himself, he will also respect the individual's wishes and let him stay alone. Most of the time, when someone is unwilling to relocate, it is usually the village cadres who carry out ideological work on him, tell him about the importance and advantages of relocation, and persuade him to relocate with the collective. In principle, we should respect personal feelings and let them stay, but they are all old people and have no ability to take care of themselves.

In this case, various methods will be used to strongly persuade you, but there are also situations where the number of elderly people accounts for a relatively large proportion, and at this time, it will be announced that the relocation has failed and will not be relocated. In addition to this case, if it is confirmed that the individual is capable of taking care of himself, and after persuasion, he is not willing to relocate, the organization will still respect the individual's wishes to let him stay. Welcome to leave a message to discuss!

Under normal circumstances, they are all willing to demolish, because the conditions given are also more reasonable, and for those who are unwilling to demolish, they may give up the construction of this land.

If you don't want to relocate, let them live, what else can you do. These people are not persuaded, and it is useless to spend energy.

Generally, they will negotiate with these people for the sake of better overall aesthetics, and if they are satisfied with the conditions, they will relocate, and if they are not satisfied, they will keep their buildings.

Generally, at this time, you can only try to persuade the other party through conversation, and if the other party is really unwilling, there is no way.