If the old house of the poor household is demolished and is unwilling to live in the resettlement ho

What to do? Some people say that the current poverty alleviation policy is really good. Some poor households arrange relocation houses for them.

New houses, spacious and bright, some are still buildings. This is a 30-year increase in living standards. However, as poor households move into new houses, problems arise.

For eligible rural poor households, it is a very big preferential treatment, that is, relocation for poverty alleviation, which is to allow those poor households in rural areas where "one side of the water and soil cannot support one person" to relocate.

Under this relocation policy, poor households only need to contribute a small amount of money to get land and relocate housing, which is calculated based on the number of poor households. That is to say, if the elderly in the three generations are not rated as poor households, then the area given by the relocation house does not include the elderly. Therefore, it is understandable that the subject said that he could not live in the relocation house for three generations.

I can't live in a new set of three generations, and the old houses in the countryside have to be demolished, so I don't know what to do? Before the relocation, the elderly were not with you, and at that time you were not separated from the poor households to take a welfare measure, in order to ensure that those low-income people in rural areas can obtain enough living space, can provide them with a shelter from the wind and rain of the poverty alleviation and welfare measures. <>

This welfare measure is not available to all rural people, only those who have registered? If there is no sub-house construction, you can choose the size of the building area according to the number of people in the house, ranging from 60 square meters to 120 square meters, and the subsidy funds are also subsidized according to the capitation, which is 37,500 yuan per person. In the rural areas, although the demolition of old houses can increase the area of land, if it is demolished, many people will be moved a few miles away or farther, resulting in the fact that the peasants will not be able to do their jobs and most of the farmland will be wasted.

Second, the poor households are self-sufficient, and now with the price of goods, the elderly will live even poorer.

In this case, we can comfort the old man, tell him to go to that place, the house here has been demolished, explain to him a situation, and slowly she will accept it.

You can tell him about the benefits of going to the resettlement house, clean and hygienic, with natural gas and running water, if you don't go, then you can only pay for it yourself to go out and find another house to live in, I believe that after weighing the pros and cons, they will definitely go to the resettlement house obediently.

You can use the resettlement house to exchange for some property, and then choose a place you like to live and live happily.

Communicate with them well and tell them about the benefits of moving to a resettlement house.

With the vigorous support of the state's poverty alleviation policy, the construction of a large number of resettlement houses has greatly improved the living conditions and living standards of poor rural households, and most of the poor rural households have moved from narrow and dilapidated old rural houses to spacious and bright resettlement houses in the town, enjoying the benefits of the poverty alleviation policy. So at this time, many people have such a question? When poor rural households move into resettlement houses built in towns, do they have to demolish and take back the houses in their rural hometowns?

According to the procedures stipulated in certain policies, when poor households move in in resettlement houses, the original rural houses are generally repossessed. <>

In the state's vigorous poverty alleviation policy, poor rural households are the key objects of state assistance, and as a group with economic difficulties, their living conditions are often not very high, and under the implementation of poverty alleviation policies, they often enjoy a lot of welfare treatment, of which resettlement housing is one of them. However, after a poor household moves into a resettlement house, in principle, the house in the hometown must be repossessed in accordance with the prescribed procedures. What many people don't know is that the resettlement housing provided by the state is not in the nature of commercial housing, and poor households can obtain the right to live in the resettlement housing, but they have no ownership.

In other words, poor households can be compensated by the resettlement houses built by the state after the demolition of their old houses in rural areas, which is also in line with the principle of "one house per household". <>

Under the strong support of the national poverty alleviation policy, the conditions of resettlement houses are far better than those of poor households, which is also a positive measure of the state to improve the living standards of poor households and accelerate poverty alleviation.

It definitely needs to be taken back, and I think this kind of practice will be seen a lot in life, and I think it is reasonable. State compensation can be obtained, so to speak, in exchange for a house.

It is to be demolished and recovered, and the houses in the countryside are offset by the resettlement houses in the towns, and the houses in the countryside do not belong to you.

The houses in my hometown have to be demolished and repossessed, because now in rural areas, the old houses are demolished for resettlement houses, which is equivalent to exchanging old houses for resettlement houses.

The solutions to poverty alleviation and relocation that are unwilling to demolish old houses are as follows:

1. Poverty alleviation and relocation are unwilling to demolish old houses, and they must not be forced to demolish. In real life, when encountering such a situation, most of them take the method of cashing in the new house first to solve it. Cashing in the new house can allow the relocated households to feel the new life first, let the parties know that the life after poverty alleviation and relocation is good, not only improve the quality of life of the residence, but also the family's income will not be affected, and then guide the demolition of the old house.

2. If a poverty alleviation and relocation agreement has been signed, then it is definitely impossible not to relocate, because once the agreement is signed, it means that the two parties have reached an agreement, and not relocating is a breach of contract. The staff should know more about the advantages and policies of poverty alleviation and relocation, so that they can clearly inform the relocation of the people who are relocated to help the poor in other places is a matter of benefiting the country and the people, and do more ideological enlightenment work to the parties.

[Legal basis].Article 509 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

The parties shall fully perform their obligations in accordance with the agreement.

The parties shall follow the principle of good faith and perform obligations such as notification, assistance, and confidentiality in accordance with the nature, purpose, and transaction habits of the contract.

In the process of performing the contract, the parties shall avoid wasting resources, polluting the environment and damaging the ecology.

Article 510.

After the contract takes effect, if the parties have not agreed on the quality, price or remuneration, place of performance, etc., or the agreement is not clear, they may supplement it by agreement; If a supplementary agreement cannot be reached, it shall be determined in accordance with the relevant provisions of the contract or transaction customs.

First, judging from the purpose and effectiveness of the implementation of poverty alleviation and relocation, it is a "chaff basket" jumping "rice basket" in itself, and few people are really willing to return to the "poor nest". <

Trees die, people move to live", poverty alleviation and relocation are moved from places with poor conditions to places with better conditions, and after relocation, they will often "send a horse and help a ride", and give corresponding support in employment, entrepreneurship, industrial development, etc., so as to ensure that they can "move out, stay stable, be employed, and gradually get rich". Therefore, unless it is an extremely special circumstance, the poor households involved in relocation will not choose to return to their original "poor nest".

Therefore, from the perspective of policy support and interest orientation, especially from the perspective of poverty alleviation acceptance, the people who were originally scheduled to relocate are not allowed to return to their hometowns to build houses.

Second, from the perspective of the implementation principles and process of poverty alleviation and relocation, it is not arbitrary and hasty to determine the relocation targets, and the relevant procedures for relocation will also be performed. <>

The determination of the poverty alleviation and relocation targets is a strict and serious matter, which will not only fully solicit the opinions of the parties, but also perform the relevant procedures (such as the application of the head of household, the approval of the superiors, and some will also sign a relocation agreement).

Third, the original old houses have been reclaimed after poverty alleviation and relocation, and the nature of the land has often changed. At a time when land use control is becoming more and more stringent, it is difficult to obtain homestead approval. Since you can't pass the approval of the homestead, it is naturally impossible to build a house in your hometown.

Poverty alleviation and relocation, as the name suggests, is to get rid of poverty before relocation, is an important measure for the state to carry out comprehensive poverty alleviation, poverty alleviation and relocation belongs to the nature of policy assistance for the relocation of migrants, the relocated poor households will get a certain amount of economic compensation, once was the dream of many rural poor people, to get poverty alleviation and relocation should be a good thing. However, in reality, there are many poor households who regret it after applying for relocation, because they have no job after relocation, and their houses in their hometowns have to be demolished, and once their houses are demolished, they will never be able to return to the countryside. Another reason is that the relocation site is generally far away from their own cultivated land, and once the old houses in the countryside are demolished, their cultivated land will not be able to be planted, and there will be no income for farmers if they do not farm.

You need to move your hukou back to your hometown first, ensure that your hukou is in your hometown, and then apply to the village committee for a piece of land to build a house, and you can only build a house after all the procedures of the village committee have been approved.

To build a house in rural areas, you need to apply for two certificates: a homestead use permit and a building permit. First, take your ID card and household registration book to the village committee to get a form and apply. It is then submitted to the county-level management bureau for approval. After the approval is passed, the certificate will be issued, and the house can be built at this time.

First of all, you should apply to the village for a homestead, and if you already have it, you must go to the housing authority with the relevant documents and application forms, and only after getting the consent letter can you start building.

The main thing is to go to the village committee to apply for the building documents, and only after this document is approved, you can go to build the house.

First of all, we need to own the land, and secondly, we should also get consent from ** so that we can build a house.

Poor households in rural areas have lived in resettlement houses in the town, but should the houses in the rural areas of their hometowns be demolished and reclaimed?

What is the reason why it will not be ** based on not being **? Because when most of the poor households are demolished, or when the poor households are resettled, the house in the hometown is basically demolished, so why do we hand over a poor household here, and he is not ** this old house? The reason is that these poor households have returned to the countryside to farm, even if they help alleviate the poverty and let him live in this Anhuan Shenyan house, but their family's rations and economy always need someone to bear it, so the actual practice on our side is that this house is not demolished, but his family is relocated to this resettlement house to live, that is, people who have no labor force and cannot produce economic benefits move to this resettlement house to live.

So for those who have labor, for those who can work, this is arranged at will, if they obey the arrangement of the first and give a certain position to work in the factory, this may not return to the original place to live, but the need to cultivate the land is also supported. So this poor household on our side, when he came back to the countryside to farm the piano, his old house was not to prevent people from living at this time, he lived in it when he came back to farm, if he didn't farm, then there was no farming, and he went to this resettlement house when he wanted to be busy working.

Summary. The issue of demolition and relocation needs to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. If you have a real estate certificate, it is a private house, although your hukou has not moved in, but you have the ownership of the house, that is, the real estate certificate, which is also your property, and you can get compensation for demolition, whether it is monetary compensation or resettlement housing compensation, it is for you.

In the second case, if your hukou is not local, but you are living with you (see the rules on co-residents in the demolition phrase package), you can also get compensation for eviction. If you don't have the above situation, you don't have a title deed, and you don't live with you, you won't be compensated.

The poor households who set up a file and established a card did not think about the resettlement house the year before last, and now they want to demolish the house in their hometown, and I am unwilling to demolish it, can I return to the resettlement house without demolishing my hometown now?

Hello, I am a cooperating lawyer and it is a pleasure to serve you.

The issue of demolition and relocation needs to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. If you have a real estate certificate, it is a private house, although your hukou has not moved in, but you have the ownership of the house, that is, the real estate certificate, which is also your property, and you can get compensation for demolition, whether it is monetary compensation or resettlement housing compensation, it is for you. In the second case, if your hukou is not local, but you are living with you (see the rules on co-residents in the demolition phrase package), you can also get compensation for eviction.

If you don't have the above situation, you don't have a title deed, and you don't live with you, you won't be compensated.