Is it possible that all rural areas will be relocated in the future? What happens if you don t move?

The relocation of the new rural construction is voluntary, what should be done with those who are unwilling to relocate? In fact, I believe that the overall transfer of rural areas is an inevitable trend of rural development.

You know, most of the countryside is located in relatively remote places. There is inconvenient transportation, the natural environment is harsh, agricultural income is very small, and there is no available resource advantage. Rural peasant households mainly earn a living by going out to work, which has caused a serious problem of third-rate work in rural areas, and the rural areas have shaken off poverty and become rich, making it very difficult to achieve the goal of economic development.

Therefore, only by moving to the new countryside can we improve the quality of life of rural people, meet the needs of medical care, education, pension and entertainment, and solve the problems of left-behind elderly, left-behind children and left-behind women in rural areas. Moreover, the natural environment of the new countryside is beautiful, the living environment is harmonious, and the accommodation environment is spacious, which is more suitable for people to live. In addition, relocating to Xinmin Village can also change the mentality of rural villagers, and use new models, new ideas, and new methods to live and make money.

It is an inevitable trend of rural development to relocate the countryside as a whole, and whether or not they are willing to move now, they will eventually move to the new countryside.

Some rural migrations are not suitable for villagers to live in poor villages, and require the entire poverty alleviation relocation. The national public utilities are the villages occupied by the airport, water conservancy, and urban construction plans. The planned villages to be relocated to Hechon and Eup.

Rural relocation is an inevitable trend, and planning the relocation address should be beneficial to the industry, and comprehensively improve the living standards of all villagers. To satisfy people's desire to pursue a happy life.

Don't those villages move? It is a nationally recognized historical and cultural village. A central village that is being planned for a tourist attraction. These villages generally do not have to be moved.

Some villagers are reluctant to move, what should they do? First of all, it shows that the relocation is not a place occupied by a national key project, and only the majority of villagers can voluntarily relocate. If it is difficult for individual villagers to leave their hometowns, it is better to think about the time again.

Now there are one or two elderly families in Laolin Village in the deep mountains who are unwilling to leave? People have seen that after the relocation, the villagers have improved their pension, schooling, medical care, work, transportation, shopping, heating, etc. I would agree with the directors.

If it is not a national key project, individual villagers can be allowed to think about it more time.

We are a big agricultural country, how to move to accommodate so many people, 800 million farmers to go ** is a problem. We don't have a city that can accommodate so many people. The countryside can be transformed in the future.

For example, for the construction of a new countryside now. It's all about getting closer to the city. The countryside will slowly approach the city through transformation.

A lot of the countryside has now become a community, like the city.

Forced demolition is now not allowed. No one can do anything unless they agree. It is often seen that there are many people in big cities who do not relocate.

What's the solution? You can only negotiate slowly and finally reach an agreement, which is really not possible. It is the policy of the state not to dismantle directly.

It is also for the benefit of the peasants that forced housing is not allowed. Rural relocation is unrealistic. After all, we have a large population, and no city can accommodate so many people.

I think it is possible to move in the future, because the demand for land for development is very large, and the rural area is very large, which is very suitable for the development of various businesses, so they will move, and if they don't move, it will be a waste of land.

In the future, it may be relocated, if the countryside is not relocated, it will only be possible to rebuild residential buildings, and with future development, most of the land will be used for industrial production.

Rural revitalization will be the most important thing in the next three years. In other words, the revitalization of this rural area will be regarded as the primary task of China's development. After all, China has always been a country with an agricultural household registration and the majority of the population.

That said, agriculture is still very important. After all, the population of our country is large and vast. Its industrial and urbanization development has achieved a good development trend.

But in the countryside, there is no uniformity. Therefore, it is necessary to give more policy inclination and support to the rural areas, so that China's agriculture can keep pace with industry, change the overall environment, and enable the state to further improve the people's living standards. In the past, almost all agriculture was practiced in rural areas, but now agricultural products are low, so most of the young people in rural areas go out to work, and a lot of land in rural areas is idle.

According to China's plan, the title of the world's agricultural power will be realized, and rural land resources will be activated through the merger of villages and villages, and capital development will be introduced.

What will the countryside be like in the future, and with the development of urbanization, will farmers leave the countryside? Urbanization development, concentration of farmers' construction land, centralized land circulation planning, investment promotion, new farmers. As young rural laborers move out to work, most of them are elderly or female, the economic model of rural smallholder farmers is likely to change as the area under cultivation decreases.

With the country's most beautiful rural strategy, the future of rural areas will no longer be farming, but leisure and entertainment, vacation as the center of development.

How to develop the countryside in the future is currently the first to be formulated, according to the national plan, according to the local civil affairs appropriate adjustment. In the rural areas with developed transportation, large villages have been formed, and the villagers who live there have planned their future and built their houses into three-story small buildings, and the service life of the houses is planned to be 100 years. They built their house into a 10,000-year-old jade at all costs and let them move, and a hundred of them would be unhappy.

Because it destroys their home and destroys the happy life they have worked so hard to build. This migration is out of touch with reality.

No, relocation is the least likely situation, only when a natural disaster occurs in this village, it will lead to the relocation of the village, and the beginning of urbanization of the countryside is a very good phenomenon, so the countryside will not be relocated.

After all, many people in the countryside are not used to going to the city, they don't like to live in the town, and rural people also have to farm, if they move to the town, then they can't farm.

I don't think the countryside will be relocated in the future, and I think not everyone can accept that all life is complete, and the countryside must exist.

It will definitely be demolished, because now the economy is constantly developing, the society is also developing, and people are more eager to live a well-off life, so they will definitely be demolished in the end.

They will all be relocated, because now people's living standards have improved, and everyone is moving to the city. In the future, the countryside will definitely be relocated.

If the countryside is relocated, there will be no one to farm in the countryside, which will reduce the production of food and threaten the growth of mankind.

In the future, the rural areas will not be relocated, because now the rural areas have built houses for poor households, so it is impossible to relocate.

That's right, the vast majority of villages in the countryside will be demolished and relocated in the future. Because the rural areas in the future will be mechanized, and the modern ones will no longer need people to work, and after the land is managed in a continuous manner, all rural peasants will enter the city to live, so the vast majority of the rural areas in the future will be demolished and relocated. Just like our rural areas in Heilongjiang, the small villages have been demolished and relocated.

And we have already mechanized agriculture here. There is no need for people to farm, it is all machines that are planting and harvesting. One machine does the work of hundreds of people, and it does it quickly and well.

It has saved a large number of laborers from rural areas to work in cities. It not only contributes to the construction of the city, but also increases the income of the farmers themselves, and the farmers with more income have bought houses in the city and become citizens, which is the trend of our country's development in the future. In the future, with the acceleration of urbanization, more than 80% of the farmers in our country will enter the city to live, so the vast majority of rural houses will be demolished.

Now it is a small village that is being demolished. In the future, the big villages will also be demolished. This is the way in which the development of urbanization in our country has brought about a life-changing situation for farmers.

With a large number of peasants entering the cities, the land in the rural areas will be planted in a continuous manner, and the continuous operation will realize the development of high-efficiency agricultural modernization and agriculture, so it is said that the peasants going to the cities will provide conditions for the continuous planting of rural mechanized agriculture, and the peasants going to the cities will also promote the development of the cities. This is the development goal of our country's urbanization.

Therefore, the vast majority of rural areas will be demolished in the future. In the next 10 to 20 years, rural demolition and relocation will be a common phenomenon. In 20 years, 80% of the villages will be gone.

The land saved by demolition and relocation will be turned into a large area of fertile land, which will increase the land of our country a lot. Such a policy is beneficial to the rest of the country and the people. Therefore, urbanization is crucial to promoting China's modernization and development.

The demolition and relocation of the countryside has enabled the peasants who have farmed the land for generations to change their way of life, and the lives of the peasants who have become citizens are getting better and richer. Therefore, the migration of peasants to the cities has played a role in promoting the development of the cities. It will play a greater role in the rural areas, and it will not only realize the continuous management of land, but also save a large amount of land and cultivate grain after the rural areas are demolished and relocated, and such a policy is really a good policy for the benefit of the country and the people.

No. Because some rural areas are well planned and all indicators meet the standards, some areas will not be demolished.

Yes, because there are still many dilapidated houses in the countryside, it is very unsafe to live in, and it will definitely be demolished.

Since ancient times, China has had feelings of homesickness, and not every rural village will be demolished. Some rural houses are backward and dilapidated and fall within the scope of demolition. Some villages with cultural monuments will not be demolished, and the state will improve the local area and turn it into a tourist village to promote local culture.

As for the issue of demolition and relocation of all rural areas, it is certainly impossible, because rural areas still need people to build them, and many rural areas are now demolished and relocated because the development of cities and towns is getting faster and faster, and they have extended to rural areas, so they have to be demolished and relocated.

No, because a large number of people prefer to go to the cities to work, the rural population is sparse, and there are no pillar industries, if you want to demolish and relocate, the cost is too high, and there is no cost performance at all.

No, because there are still many people who like to live in the countryside and don't want to come out, and there are also some people in the city who want to go to the countryside to build houses.

Rural areas will not be completely relocated in the next five years. Only rural areas that meet the demolition policy will be relocated. Where it is truly necessary to expropriate land owned by peasant collectives for the sake of the public interest, the expropriation may be carried out in accordance with law.

It should also conform to the national economic and social development plan, the overall land use plan, the urban and rural plan, and the special plan. Article 47 of the Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China.

If the state expropriates land, after approval in accordance with legal procedures, the local people at or above the county level shall make a public announcement and organize the implementation.

If the local people at or above the county level intend to apply for land expropriation, they shall carry out a survey of the current situation of the land to be expropriated and a social stability risk assessment, and announce the scope of expropriation, the current status of the land, the purpose of expropriation, the compensation standard, the resettlement method and social security within the scope of the township (town) and village and villager group where the land is to be expropriated for at least 30 days, and listen to the opinions of the rural collective economic organizations and their members, villagers' committees and other stakeholders who are subject to land expropriation.

The owner or user of the land to be expropriated shall, within the time limit specified in the announcement, go through the compensation registration with the proof of immovable property ownership.

In fact, whether they are willing to relocate or not depends mainly on whether the demolition compensation policy is reasonable, if the demolition policy is good, the people who are being demolished get benefits, living standards, and living conditions are improved, the vast majority of people will agree to relocate.

I don't want to relocate, I love my hometown.

If you don't have to work too hard to buy a house in the urban area, then if your home is in the countryside or not demolished, if it is a little difficult, then seek to demolish it!

Glad for your question.

My hometown has not been demolished yet, and I personally think it is better not to demolish it. My ancestors have lived in my hometown, and the mountains and rivers around me have long been integrated with me, and when I go to China and even anywhere in the world, I will always have a nostalgic hometown in my heart. This sense of hometown has long been ingrained.

I think it's better not to demolish for the following reasons.

1. If you don't have any skills, you can only go out to work, and in the future, others don't want you to work as a duster, and your hometown still has soil to grow some vegetables to live. (Assuming no deposit).

Hello, I'm your favorite french fries Maling potato.

We don't have a demolition plan here, anyway, there will be no demolition in ten years to let us know, and there has been one relocation, and that is all about my father's generation.

As early as 45 years ago (in fact) there was a large-scale relocation, because the people living near the river are also in low-lying villages and towns, and the downstream construction of hydropower stations is even worse, there is less land that could be cultivated, and the water level of the hydropower station will rise rapidly, and GJ has to prevent the large-scale relocation to the upstream or downstream, and my parents were only seven or eight years old at the time.

We also learned about their childhood by listening to their stories, and the closer we got to the old childhood, the more fun it was [laughs].

If you want to dismantle, you can't necessarily dismantle, and sometimes you have to dismantle if you don't want to. Overall, the more you demolish, the better your life gets.

It's impossible for my turn to demolish my hometown! If you want to demolish it, it must be the local policy. Demolition is still better, and development is the last word.

My hometown has been relocated, which is the earliest relocation project, and I feel that the relocation is good and life is more convenient.

My hometown is a rural area, less than 30 kilometers away from the county seat, due to special reasons (local ** development of tourism industry) to maintain the original ethnic minority (Dong nationality) unique houses wooden houses are not allowed to be demolished, to maintain the original characteristics, I think this initiative is very good.

Now to ** are cement roads, the traffic is also convenient, children go to school also have a special car pick-up, I personally think it is better not to demolish, the rural landscape is good, the villagers are industrious and simple, the air is good, I especially like to make the village, the conditions are ripe, I plan to build a delicate small wooden house at home, find a virtuous and bright wife, a good life.