Whether the relocation of the new rural construction is voluntary, what should be done if someone is

Since the relocation of the new rural construction is voluntary, it cannot force people to move out of their old houses. Some people are unable to leave their homeland and do not want to leave the place where they have lived for generations; Some people estimate that life is difficult and they do not have the money to pay for a new house. Therefore, since the houses of villagers who are unwilling to relocate should be kept in their original places, they cannot be forced to live in houses in the new countryside.

In fact, I personally think that the unified resettlement of the new countryside is quite good. In some towns and villages in our hometown, the construction of new rural areas has already begun, and it is all voluntary and not mandatory. The houses resettled in the new countryside are all unified two-story villas, which are very foreign, and it is enough for a family to live.

Moreover, the roads, greening and other facilities are also very complete, which is exactly the same as the community in the city.

It feels very good to live in such a community, the transportation is convenient, and the sanitation is much better than the dirty mess in the countryside before. Moreover, the resettlement sites living in the new countryside do not delay farming. This is because resettlement sites are generally placed in a few villages or places with relatively high populations.

It's not very far from the place where your bag is made, and it doesn't take much time to walk or ride.

A few years ago, our village said that it would carry out the construction of a new countryside, but unfortunately it has not been carried out until now. It's not that it won't be carried out, but the time has not yet come, and I believe that it will be carried out in the next few years. My hukou is in my hometown in the countryside, and my parents have returned to the countryside to live their old age.

If I want to carry out rural development, I will definitely participate.

My family's house was built by my dad decades ago. At that time, the family was poor and the house was not enough to live in, so they had to borrow money from everywhere, and then demolished the old mud house and rebuilt the current two-story brick house. Although it is a building, it has not been renovated for more than ten years after it was repaired, and I grew up in this kind of white embryo house.

This kind of house is built with bricks, and then the floor of the second floor is made of prefabricated panels, and the shockproof performance is not very good, which is what I am most worried about. In the past few years, there have been frequent incidents near our hometown, and every time I am worried, especially my parents have been living in it, and I am very worried.

Therefore, if my hometown wants to carry out the construction of a new countryside, I will definitely participate in it, so that my parents can live more comfortably in the countryside and I can rest assured. Also, sooner or later, I will have to go back to the countryside to live. After all, the countryside is my roots, and the fallen leaves will return to their roots sooner or later.

I volunteered, but I have two sons, and now that the eldest son is married, and the family lives in an 80-square-meter house, can I go home and build a house to live in?

I think it's important to understand why these people don't want to move out, so that they can adapt to this new situation and address their concerns.

Personally, I think that since it is voluntary to relocate, then those who are unwilling to relocate should stay in their original place, and these people must also have their own certain ability to survive, so they are not willing to move away.

If they are not willing to relocate, they will do their work, and give them relocation compensation to a certain extent, so as to reduce their certain losses.

This needs to be seen whether it is the best behavior, and what is the reasonWell, why do you want to demolish, if it is the first behavior, then we have a unified appeal to allow demolition, and there is also where everyone lives now, isn't itThere is a risk, if there is a statement, it is recommended that you or demolish, if the above is not successful, you can not demolish according to your own intentions.

If it is purely commercial, they can be fairly discussed with each other, and if the negotiation fails, they can not be demolished; However, if it is a service type, there is no way to put an end to it, but there is a right to provide for fair and just compensation. Today, although the forced demolition of the executive branch has been abolished, the forced demolition of the judiciary still exists. Regulations on the Expropriation and Compensation of Houses on State-Owned Land.

Article 28 requires that the expropriated person shall not apply for administrative reconsideration or file an administrative lawsuit within the statutory time limit.

Where the demolition is not carried out within the time required for the determination of compensation, it is <>

The people of the city, county, and city level that made the determination of compensation for housing expropriation shall apply for enforcement by the people's court in accordance with regulations.

I don't know what the details of the demolition you are talking about. Under normal circumstances, if it is due to the construction and demolition of the project, the state will first expropriate the collective land as state-owned, and the local government (generally implemented by the Land Bureau) will sign a compensation and resettlement agreement with the farmers according to the compensation and resettlement plan, and after the compensation installation is completed, the house will be moved.

If there is no reasonable and legal land acquisition procedures, or feel that the compensation installation is not scientific, able to refuse demolition. The state has compulsory land acquisition, and farmers cannot refuse to be demolished if the formalities are complete. If we should carry out demolition and relocation of China's special land resources, at this time, it is not that you have the final say that you will not be demolished, and most people still have to choose to carry out demolition, after all, China's land expropriation is a problem of preferential tax policies.

Therefore, according to such a thing, the demolition still has to be relocated, and after all, we can't do too many unreasonable things on these issues.

Of course, for the construction of new rural areas that need to be relocated, the principle of voluntariness is generally observed, and farmers can move away if they are willing to relocate, but they can not move if they are not willing to relocate.

Do you want to become a nail household, bulldoze the houses next to you, and then you live in the square by yourself, there are a few real things that happen, all because the residents themselves refuse to relocate, and then the business will build big high-rise buildings around, and no one will give you money if you want to move out in the future, or respond to the call.

Not agreeing to the demolition, or not signing the demolition agreement, will not prevent the demolition.

The relocation of the new rural construction is voluntary, which is a national policy, and the best way for residents who are unwilling to relocate is not to deal with it。Not dealing with it does not mean not solving the problem, after most of the farmers move out of the village, the infrastructure here will also be removed, the village's water, electricity, network and other infrastructure will no longer be provided by the state, the users here have to rely on their own basic life, they can be self-sufficient in a short time, but for a long time in such a deserted place to survive, there is no water and electricity, no heating, the needs of daily life can not be met, and finally the residents will automatically move out of here.

Many peasants are reluctant to move out of their villages, mainly because they do not understand the country's policies. At this time, it is necessary to patiently and carefully publicize the relocation policy to the residents, so that they can understand the benefits, and now in order to let the farmers live a better life and reach the average well-off level, the state has made great efforts to implement a lot of poverty alleviation policies. But many people don't understand the policies, they still hold on to the old idea, this backwardness is the root cause of poverty in the village, and only by changing their thinking can their quality of life be improved.

Many peasants regard the land as their own life, they are the inhabitants of the times, and it is understandable that they are reluctant to leave their native homeland。We must have a tolerant heart to face the peasants, to appease their angry emotions, the relocation of the new countryside can allow the peasants to obtain a better living environment, improve the living environment, can also increase the use rate of land, farmers concentrated residence heating, focus on solving the housing problem, this is a good policy provided by the state.

One of the reasons why farmers are reluctant to relocate is that they have worries. They have no other economic income when they move to the top of the building, and they cannot support the cost of the house, so after solving the housing problem of the peasants, it is necessary to solve their employment problem, increase their economic income, and maintain the expenses of normal life.

In the construction of the new countryside, it is believed that the vast majority of them are still willing to relocate, and a small number of "nail households" who are unwilling to relocate are dissatisfied with the relocation conditions, but if these households are always unwilling to relocate, they can only live in the original house, and the basic facilities of water and electricity have been destroyed, and normal life will be greatly affected. MoreoverThere will be certain incentives for residents who move out early, and they can also give priority to choosing a good floor and location when choosing a resettlement house, which is not enjoyed by those who are unwilling to relocate.

If you are unwilling to relocate and do not need to be demolished and rebuilt at the site, you can continue to live at the original site. If the original site must be demolished and rebuilt, the two parties will generally negotiate suitable conditions and then carry out voluntary relocation.

Those who do not want to relocate should be given a piece of land to build a house, and the countryside is their home. Giving them a place to settle down is especially convenient for them.

Those who are unwilling to be demolished will definitely choose to stay in the same place, and no compulsory measures will be taken in this case, and the consent of the other party must be fully obtained.

Those who don't want to relocate may stay there, and they won't be able to receive the benefits of those support policies, and people will be sent from above to enlighten you, and there are fewer and fewer people nearby, and sooner or later they will relocate.

There are also voluntary and involuntary can have two choices, those who have their own houses are willing to demolish them, give money to solve them by themselves, and give them the conditions for buying resettlement houses, and those who can't afford to buy a house and leave the countryside not far away can build a house in one village and one place!

This thing can't be forced, whoever wants to move who goes, who doesn't want to go, keep it as it is, I still like the original place, the house.

Would you like to tear down the house that someone has worked so hard to build and then let you pay for it to buy a house in the new countryside?

If you have a way out, you can't move for no reason.

I do. Don't go against the national plan.

Who wants to move, only those who are lazy want to move.

The policy is voluntary, and the implementation becomes mandatory

The governor said that 95 out of 100 would agree.

Five hundred to eight hundred and one square meters, the homestead is not money, may I ask how many are voluntary.

With the completion of the upgrading of rural roads and power grids on our side, and the realization of the integration of urban and rural sanitation, urban and rural water supply, and the acceleration of the pace of township construction and other new changes, in the past two years, all over the country has actively carried out new rural construction, currently in our county and the following towns have been carried out, such as our county and suburbs demolition villages as many as 10, and the new rural construction in the township will have two programs, one is through the merger of villages to achieve the in-situ community building, The other is the very common way of moving the village as a whole into the town's larger community.

For the construction of new farmers need to relocate, generally abide by the principle of voluntariness, farmers can move if they are willing to relocate, but if they are not willing to relocate, they can also not move. If you want to talk about how to deal with farmers who are unwilling to relocate, in fact, they don't deal with it, and they don't have to worry about anything. Some people may say why some people are reluctant to move into a new countryside, but there are actually many reasons.

For example, if the new farmers are building new houses in a unified manner, they generally need to pay part of the money themselves, after all, it is impossible for the state to give you a free place to live, if you are reluctant to get any money, then there is no need to raise such lazy people.

After the collective relocation, the old villages were basically reclaimed and cultivated. As a result, the old houses in the past were basically demolished and reclaimed into arable land for rational use. The original supporting facilities are not very perfect, and over time, there are very few households left in the old village who are unwilling to relocate.

After a long time, the popularity was not strong, and these families finally couldn't bear it, so they turned around and went to the village committee and asked to move to the new district.

What are the items of compensation for house demolition?

Various types of compensation paid by the demolition and construction unit to the owner or user of the demolished house in accordance with the prescribed standards. Specific compensation items include:

1. The housing compensation fee is used to compensate for the loss of the owner of the demolished house, which is classified according to the structure and depreciation degree of the demolished house, and is calculated according to the unit price of square meters.

2. The turnover compensation fee is used to compensate for the inconvenience of the residents of the demolished houses for temporary living or finding temporary residences, and is classified according to the temporary living conditions, and the monthly subsidy is given according to the population of the residents of the demolished houses.

3. Incentive compensation is used to encourage the residents of the demolished houses to actively assist in the demolition of the houses or take the initiative to give up some rights, such as voluntarily moving to the suburbs or not requiring the demolition units to resettle the housing.

In addition to the housing compensation due to the demolished person, they can also receive: moving compensation and hail compensation; equipment relocation fees; Temporary resettlement subsidy during the transition period.

Although the relocation of the new countryside is a voluntary project, it also adheres to the principle that the minority obeys the majority. If there are not many or no more than the vast majority of farmers in the village who agree to relocate, then the task of building a new countryside will be canceled, and if there are only two or three nail households in a village who are unwilling to relocate. Then the relocation plan of the whole village will not be affected, and this kind of people who do not want to relocate may face water, electricity or road cuts, and eventually they will also move out voluntarily.