Why are some farmers reluctant to relocate?

As a big country in traditional culture, loving the country and loving home has always been the connotation of culture, and sticking to the homeland has also become the creed of many people, so although life is difficult, they are not willing to go away.

I think the reason why farmers are reluctant to relocate is because their ancestors have lived here for generations, which may carry a lot of nostalgia for farmers.

For him, he is used to that kind of life, maybe he is not used to the kind of life in the birdcage, the free life, better, habits are difficult to change.

This needs to be seen whether it is the best behavior, and what is the reasonWell, why do you want to demolish, if it is the first behavior, then we have a unified appeal to allow demolition, and there is also where everyone lives now, isn't itThere is a risk, if there is a statement, it is recommended that you or demolish, if the above is not successful, you can not demolish according to your own intentions.

If it is purely commercial, they can be fairly discussed with each other, and if the negotiation fails, they can not be demolished; However, if it is a service type, there is no way to put an end to it, but there is a right to provide for fair and just compensation. Today, although the forced demolition of the executive branch has been abolished, the forced demolition of the judiciary still exists. Regulations on the Expropriation and Compensation of Houses on State-Owned Land.

Article 28 requires that the expropriated person shall not apply for administrative reconsideration or file an administrative lawsuit within the statutory time limit.

Where the demolition is not carried out within the time required for the determination of compensation, it is <>

The people of the city, county, and city level that made the determination of compensation for housing expropriation shall apply for enforcement by the people's court in accordance with regulations.

I don't know what the details of the demolition you are talking about. Under normal circumstances, if it is due to the construction and demolition of the project, the state will first expropriate the collective land as state-owned, and the local government (generally implemented by the Land Bureau) will sign a compensation and resettlement agreement with the farmers according to the compensation and resettlement plan, and after the compensation installation is completed, the house will be moved.

If there is no reasonable and legal land acquisition procedures, or feel that the compensation installation is not scientific, able to refuse demolition. The state has compulsory land acquisition, and farmers cannot refuse to be demolished if the formalities are complete. If we should carry out demolition and relocation of China's special land resources, at this time, it is not that you have the final say that you will not be demolished, and most people still have to choose to carry out demolition, after all, China's land expropriation is a problem of preferential tax policies.

Therefore, according to such a thing, the demolition still has to be relocated, and after all, we can't do too many unreasonable things on these issues.

Of course, for the construction of new rural areas that need to be relocated, the principle of voluntariness is generally observed, and farmers can move away if they are willing to relocate, but they can not move if they are not willing to relocate.

Do you want to become a nail household, bulldoze the houses next to you, and then you live in the square by yourself, there are a few real things that happen, all because the residents themselves refuse to relocate, and then the business will build big high-rise buildings around, and no one will give you money if you want to move out in the future, or respond to the call.

Not agreeing to the demolition, or not signing the demolition agreement, will not prevent the demolition.

Legal analysis: After the farmer demolition, if the land is expropriated, the land compensation will be compensated, if the land is not expropriated, then you can return to the land to continue tracking, if the land is rented by other farms, then the farm will give you an annual rental fee.

Legal basis: "Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 62 A rural villager household may only own one homestead land, and the area of the homestead shall not exceed the standards prescribed by the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government.

In areas where per capita land is small and it is not possible to guarantee that a household has a homestead land, the people at the county level may, on the basis of fully respecting the wishes of rural villagers, take measures to ensure that rural villagers have a place to live in accordance with the standards set by provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government.

Rural villagers building houses shall conform to the overall land use plan and village plan of the township (town), shall not occupy permanent basic farmland, and shall use the original homestead land and vacant land in the village as much as possible. The preparation of township (town) land use plans and village plans shall make overall plans and reasonable arrangements for homestead land to improve the living environment and conditions of rural villagers.

The residential land of rural villagers shall be reviewed and approved by the people of the township (town); Among them, where the occupation of agricultural land is involved, the examination and approval formalities shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of Article 44 of this Law.

Rural villagers who sell, lease, or donate their dwellings and then apply for homestead land shall not be approved.

The State allows rural villagers who have settled in urban areas to voluntarily withdraw from their homesteads with compensation in accordance with the law, and encourages rural collective economic organizations and their members to revitalize and utilize idle homesteads and idle residences.

The competent departments of agriculture and rural affairs are responsible for the work related to the reform and management of rural homesteads nationwide.

The relocation of the new rural construction is voluntary, which is a national policy, and the best way for residents who are unwilling to relocate is not to deal with it。Not dealing with it does not mean not solving the problem, after most of the farmers move out of the village, the infrastructure here will also be removed, the village's water, electricity, network and other infrastructure will no longer be provided by the state, the users here have to rely on their own basic life, they can be self-sufficient in a short time, but for a long time in such a deserted place to survive, there is no water and electricity, no heating, the needs of daily life can not be met, and finally the residents will automatically move out of here.

Many peasants are reluctant to move out of their villages, mainly because they do not understand the country's policies. At this time, it is necessary to patiently and carefully publicize the relocation policy to the residents, so that they can understand the benefits, and now in order to let the farmers live a better life and reach the average well-off level, the state has made great efforts to implement a lot of poverty alleviation policies. But many people don't understand the policies, they still hold on to the old idea, this backwardness is the root cause of poverty in the village, and only by changing their thinking can their quality of life be improved.

Many peasants regard the land as their own life, they are the inhabitants of the times, and it is understandable that they are reluctant to leave their native homeland。We must have a tolerant heart to face the peasants, to appease their angry emotions, the relocation of the new countryside can allow the peasants to obtain a better living environment, improve the living environment, can also increase the use rate of land, farmers concentrated residence heating, focus on solving the housing problem, this is a good policy provided by the state.

One of the reasons why farmers are reluctant to relocate is that they have worries. They have no other economic income when they move to the top of the building, and they cannot support the cost of the house, so after solving the housing problem of the peasants, it is necessary to solve their employment problem, increase their economic income, and maintain the expenses of normal life.

In the construction of the new countryside, it is believed that the vast majority of them are still willing to relocate, and a small number of "nail households" who are unwilling to relocate are dissatisfied with the relocation conditions, but if these households are always unwilling to relocate, they can only live in the original house, and the basic facilities of water and electricity have been destroyed, and normal life will be greatly affected. MoreoverThere will be certain incentives for residents who move out early, and they can also give priority to choosing a good floor and location when choosing a resettlement house, which is not enjoyed by those who are unwilling to relocate.

If you are unwilling to relocate and do not need to be demolished and rebuilt at the site, you can continue to live at the original site. If the original site must be demolished and rebuilt, the two parties will generally negotiate suitable conditions and then carry out voluntary relocation.

Those who do not want to relocate should be given a piece of land to build a house, and the countryside is their home. Giving them a place to settle down is especially convenient for them.

Those who are unwilling to be demolished will definitely choose to stay in the same place, and no compulsory measures will be taken in this case, and the consent of the other party must be fully obtained.

Those who don't want to relocate may stay there, and they won't be able to receive the benefits of those support policies, and people will be sent from above to enlighten you, and there are fewer and fewer people nearby, and sooner or later they will relocate.

There are also voluntary and involuntary can have two choices, those who have their own houses are willing to demolish them, give money to solve them by themselves, and give them the conditions for buying resettlement houses, and those who can't afford to buy a house and leave the countryside not far away can build a house in one village and one place!

This thing can't be forced, whoever wants to move who goes, who doesn't want to go, keep it as it is, I still like the original place, the house.

Would you like to tear down the house that someone has worked so hard to build and then let you pay for it to buy a house in the new countryside?

If you have a way out, you can't move for no reason.

I do. Don't go against the national plan.

Who wants to move, only those who are lazy want to move.

The policy is voluntary, and the implementation becomes mandatory

The governor said that 95 out of 100 would agree.

Five hundred to eight hundred and one square meters, the homestead is not money, may I ask how many are voluntary.