Leaders don t pay attention to their subordinates, is it necessary for such a company to continue to

It is necessary to reflect on oneself in order to make more long-term progress and try to communicate with leaders. It's a level.

articulation between them. It has jumped out of the original business scope, and it is necessary to connect with the level, which requires ways and means. To put it bluntly, this is to consider being sleek.

You need to understand that you are not working for the leader, you are working for the unit, and the work you do must be worthy of the salary you receive. In addition, you can also learn more knowledge and improve your ability to work, if you can't bear it, you can leave, but think about it before deciding.

<> suggest that you have a sweeter mouth, give more food, drink and fun to those villains behind you, and constantly improve your status, and you must get rid of this kind of person when you have the ability! This kind of person is the moth of the enterprise.

Staying behind will eventually ruin the business. You don't have to take most of your life for the recognition of one person. Besides, does leadership approval mean that you are competent? Not necessarily. Just because your leader doesn't approve doesn't mean you can't achieve anything.

If you really can't do it, you should go directly to the leader, lower your posture, humbly ask the leader, what aspects you have not done well, and ask the leader to criticize and correct. With this attitude, it is estimated that the leader will also moderately point out the problem to you, and when other colleagues are busy, don't go around the office, talk to someone, and say that you have nothing to do, such behavior will only be offensive. It's not about showing your potential, it's a sign of immaturity that will make people look down.

Be at ease with what you can do, be pampered, have calmness, and be resilient, and will be recognized and respected by the other party.

Don't wait for the boss to arrange a job for you, are you not clear about your position and work in the company? You don't have a clear plan for what you want to do every day, what is important, what is not important, what needs to be rushed, and what can be put aside? Don't be too passive in the workplace, the more you think about it, the more you don't understand.

Communicate more with your boss and fight for what you want. I believe that the boss will also like such enterprising and generous subordinates.

So that there is no need. A company's good welfare treatment for employees can make employees have better enthusiasm for work, and then make the company get better development, a company can only do unity and mutual assistance, in order to make the company thriving. If the leader does not pay attention to the subordinates, it is not very beneficial to the future development prospects of the subordinates.

I don't think it's necessary. Because staying in such a company, I didn't stand out or anything like that.

I don't think so. Because this kind of company is short-sighted, even the leaders don't know the basic skills of control.

If the company's leaders are not pragmatic, it is better not to continue to stay in such a company, this kind of leadership usually does not develop very well, and sometimes it is quite time-delayed.

As long as you do what you should do, be conscientious and responsible for your work, and complete it with quality and quantity, so that the leader's non-pragmatism will have little impact on yourself.

If the company's leaders are not pragmatic, we must also do our own work. If the leadership is not pragmatic and affects our daily work and future development, we can find opportunities to find another career and develop on a better platform.

My friend vigorously came to me and told him a problem that had been very bitter recently: one of his subordinates always did not do his job well, either he lacked this one and missed the side, or he did not do what he wanted as a leader at all, and now he always follows this subordinate to clean up the mess, which makes him exhausted, and he almost wants to get rid of this subordinate immediately.

So the subordinate Yunpi always can't do a good job, should he be fired?

Of course, the answer is not so straightforward, and we need to analyze this question concretely.

First of all, it is necessary to see whether subordinates do not do their work well or whether it is a problem of subordinates or leaders.

Second, if it is really a problem of subordinates, then it is necessary to see whether it is a problem of ability or willingness.

In the end, if your subordinates don't do their jobs well, should you fire him? In fact, at this time, the leader should look at whether it is his own problem, if not, then he should analyze what is wrong with the employee, and find different solutions for different problems. There really isn't an employee in this world who can't do it at all, only the misplaced employee.

I hope everyone can find a platform to give full play to their strengths and strengths

I will stay for a good company, because only a good company is worth staying, the leader may change, but the company will not change.

I will stay for a good position because it will give me a higher salary.

It must be a good leader, because there is more room for promotion with a good leader.

I will stay for a good leader, because a good leader is directly related to you, and if the leader is particularly good, you can also benefit from it.

I usually stay for a good company, because a good company is good for my career development.

The relationship with the leader is not very good, but the company is very good, so I encountered a difficult choice: whether to choose grievances or choose to change jobs? After reading it, I have a question, why is the consideration of the problem so extreme!

Could it be said that there is no better third option than to seek satisfaction from grievances and change jobs, such as properly handling the relationship with leading cadres, accomplishing harmonious coexistence, and not delaying making money? If you choose to leave because you don't have a good relationship with the leader, you are hoping for your own shit luck! I hope that in the company you interview later, you can meet a leading cadre and CEO who is particularly good to you.

Do you think you can really be so lucky?

Do you think that there is no way that something bad will happen to other companies? It is also unrealistic to teach your own situation and dilemma to the outside world, and expect environmental factors to give you a good indoor space! For most of the good friends who are just starting out in the workplace, especially those of us who were born into the grassroots entrepreneurial class, you, like the old ghosts, usually do not have the opportunity to enter the excellent, energetic, and endless growth space of large enterprises.

Most of the small and medium-sized enterprises in China, regardless of the size of the company, the company's management ability, the literacy level of the company's management, and the development potential of the company's development, are not unsatisfactory. Don't create too high standards for the CEOs and leading cadres of your own enterprises.

Don't expect them to improve themselves quickly and change the status quo. Therefore, many people in the workplace will face an unsatisfactory situation in the workplace environment. The relationship with the leader is not very good, and it is only one of the elements!

And. Superb subordinates, find a way to "manage the method" of leadership; Subordinates with high emotional intelligence can even convert leading cadres and turn enemies into their allies. This kind of emotional intelligence, if we can't learn it.

You can also try to patch the association. Sometimes you take the initiative to mend the relationship, just so that the leading cadres have a step down, maybe the leading cadres are waiting for you to bow their heads? Bow your head, will you die?

Not easy. If you want to make a good trend, try to actively repair the association, <>

The subordinates do not get angry with the leader, reduce their own posture, actively try well in private, and take the initiative in the assigned work performance, and the relationship between the two is gradually eased. Walk. It's the next step.

The company is good, the welfare is good, you give up these in order to be less wronged. It shows that your ability to control your emotions is weak, and this is a big loss. But it's a situation that has to go up.

It is the leading cadre who has a deep blood feud with you, and the differences cannot be reconciled, and this leading cadre is also one of the shareholders or founders of the company, and it is unlikely that he will leave the company. If he inhibits you for a long time, your career development will be ruined, because your ** period will only be 20 years. You try to repair it, if you can't fix it, don't delay your career, you are young, you should leave, you can't hang yourself from a tree.

If you are very eager for this company, then you can continue to stay. If you have been suppressed by the leader for a long time, or if you are not satisfied, you should resign as soon as possible.

You can choose to work in other departments, the company's development is relatively good, and it is not recommended to change jobs easily.

You can choose to change jobs, you need to choose according to your actual situation, and choose according to your career plan.

I remember that there was an old colleague in the company before, who told everyone at every turn that he was leaving, and felt that his work was boring, and he listened to him and others nagging in private every day. But then one day he didn't mention the resignation again, and everyone was still very puzzled at that time, so they half-jokingly asked him why he didn't mention the resignation? Are you reluctant to leave?

This old colleague usually laughs and does not say anything, and sometimes he will say: I am willing to ......

It wasn't until a long time later that I listened to the assistant to the leader chatting with people, saying that one day an old colleague went to the boss and put forward the idea of leaving, and the boss saw that his work ability was okay, and he was considered an old employee in the company, so he proposed to add 1,000 yuan to him, and wanted him to continue to work in the company, which completely dispelled his thoughts.

But then again, this old colleague is also a bit scheming, he started to tell his colleagues that he wanted to leave a long time before he didn't find a leader, and when he really talked to the leader about this problem, the leader already knew that he wanted to leave, so he quickly gave a mutually acceptable condition.

Of course, for those friends who also want to be promoted and raised, until the last resort, don't negotiate with the boss by leaving the job, if you don't negotiate well, you will directly cut off your own back road, even if you negotiate, it will leave a bad impression on the leader, and even make people feel that you are a threat in disguise.

"Retreat is not for everyone, they all say that soldiers are expensive and dangerous, but usually in the workplace, maintaining stability is more important than taking risks.

There is no way to do this, as a leader, you must get his superiors and subordinates at the same time to be a good leader, so this situation must be gone. Because the superior leader has the final say, and what the employee says doesn't count!

Prove that he is a good leader, for the sake of employees to win the hearts of employees but also block the way of leadership, and some leaders opinions and ideas are different, then the leader of the top priority is to establish their own network, not only with your support but also have a strong network to let themselves have a foothold, but also to be smooth to let themselves stand in a firm position.

There is a problem with the system of the unit, and the leaders who are willing to stay are good leaders, willing to call the shots for employees, and are very considerate of the employees' efforts and hard work, however, the system of the unit and the vast majority of leaders are unwilling to see such leaders, because they are jealous of the leader's ability and affinity, so this is the reason why employees support to keep the leader, and the leader does not support him.

This is not something that employees can control, so do your job well.

Let's go with the flow, our employees do not have the right to appoint and dismiss personnel, although your leader is a good leader in your eyes, but not necessarily in the eyes of his superiors, so the employees below can not convince his superiors.

This is your own passion, this leader wants to continue to be a leader, this is the company's decision not your decision, you are just a part-time job.

For team members, learn to criticize in good faith, help team members recognize mistakes, correct behaviors, and establish lofty life aspirations. They will oversee the effective implementation of the system of rewards and punishments. They give people a sense of trustworthiness and trustworthiness, and that's the kind of backing team members they want when they're traveling in a foreign land.

In the enterprise, people with a righteous atmosphere can promote the continuous improvement of the company's system, can promote the continuous improvement of the enterprise, and will also bring efficient execution. Their existence makes the enterprise embody a humanistic spirit and has a solid cultural heritage. The typical characteristics of this type of person are strong professional quality, conscientiousness, dedication, and unique job value.

They have good overall quality, high personal accomplishment, command ability and scheduling ability, can build a team, lead the team, and complete the work responsibilities of the team in accordance with the company's strategic deployment. They are experts in their own fields, can propose solutions to problems from a professional point of view, can provide professional suggestions and reports, show a strong level of professionalism, and can let superiors rest assured to explain tasks. People who stand alone, because of their presence, allow the company to show a value and make the company more like a valuable team.

I think that unlike some leaders' opinions and ideas, then the top priority for this leader is to establish their own network, not only with your support but also with a strong network to let themselves have a foothold, and at the same time, to be smooth and let themselves stand firm Thank you!