What is the main difference between Wang Li s ancient Chinese and Guo Xiliang s ancient Chinese?

The main difference between Wang Li's ancient Chinese and Guo Xiliang's ancient Chinese is that the former is more detailed in terms of phonology, while the latter is slightly better in terms of vocabulary.

What we learned was Wang Li's, published by Zhonghua Book Company.

There are four volumes in total. It may be a bit difficult for beginners.

Each has its own merits, but I think Guo Xiliang's is easier.

It is best to read the books designated by the school you are taking, Guo Xiliang's version of ancient Chinese should be available, you can go to bookstores such as Zhuo Zhuo and Dangdang, and you should be able to buy them. Below**There are notes from Guo Xiliang's version of ancient Chinese.

There are many works on ancient Chinese, but Hu Anshun and Guo Xiliang's ancient Chinese is a reference book for general university entrance examinations, and the content has its own merits, which can be used as a learning tool. There is also Wang Li's version of ancient Chinese, which are all good professional books, if you want to go to graduate school, ask the seniors, and the counselor's opinion.

Guo Xiliang's ancient Chinese is simpler and less content than Wang Li's, and Guo Xiliang is a student of Wang Li. Generally speaking, when it comes to graduate school, most colleges and universities still require Wang Li. If you are a beginner, it is recommended to look at Guo Xiliang, and if you are professional, you can see Wang Li.

As far as I know, it seems that Guo Lao's books are more recommended, and the Commercial Press and Zhonghua Book Company are not distinguished, and personally, the ancient literature prefers business, which is basically the same.

It's just that Wang Lao's version is older and slightly more difficult, but Guo Lao's is often recommended for graduate school entrance examinations, and each has its own equal.

The content is almost the same, and I personally think that Zhonghua Book Company is better.

The general part of the article is not very easy to understand, and the article may be more comprehensive than other books, and I mean that the content in the article may be a little more comprehensive than that of other books.

The commonly used words part is okay, quite complete.

Highly recommended. Mr. Wang's rigorous scholarship and rich teaching experience make his book Ancient Chinese an excellent textbook that has not been surpassed so far and may not be surpassed in the future. At the end of each chapter, the "Small Dictionary of Chinese Characters" is the blueprint for the new "Wang Li's Dictionary of Ancient Chinese" published the year before last, which is very good, unlike most dictionaries that only explain, but also explain the origin.

Of course, it depends on your purpose, but what I said above is aimed at lovers of ancient Chinese. If you just want to get a taste of it, you don't have to. If you are going to take the exam, it is best to use the reference materials they specify.

The "hardship" of the iceberg and snow upstairs does not come from nowhere, is it because of traditional Chinese characters? I think that if you are interested in ancient Chinese, you must first know traditional Chinese characters - in fact, it is much easier than you think.

Note: It's not a "small dictionary of Chinese characters", it's a "commonly used word", as minlan105 downstairs said.

Compulsory course in the Department of Chinese Language and Literature at any university.

I saw this book, the cover is a bit broken.

Super well written.

If you are interested in ancient Chinese, we recommend !!

Authoritative 1st floor stupid? There is already a simplified Chinese version.

It is indeed an authority, and it is also a fact that there are some slight errors in the textbooks of major universities, and no one is perfect! The four books are quite thick: volumes 1 to 3 are anthologies of various ancient texts plus explanations and general theory of ancient Chinese (basic knowledge of ancient culture:

Such as marriage customs, etc.), and the last volume is the knowledge of poetry selections and peace.

Since you are interested in ancient Chinese, it is necessary to look at traditional characters, not to mention the changes in characters.

They are all traditional characters, which are more difficult, and are said to have been the preferred bibliography of many colleges and universities.

I've read one (four books in total), and I personally think it can only be used as a reference, and it doesn't make much sense to flip through it casually. If you have difficulty reading traditional Chinese, it is best to choose other books to read.

It's just that it was done earlier, and everyone doesn't like to read it, and those who have read it use it to show off and embarrass everyone. Worse, worse than Guo Xiliang's.